Vegetarian High Protein Weight Loss Diets — ALPROsoya  

Obesity Clinical Trial

Official title: Vegetarian High Protein Weight Loss Diets

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to investigate the mechanistic processes involved in protein-induced satiety/satiation during weight loss in humans.

Thsi study will investigate:

• How do high-protein weight loss (HPWL) diets rich in meat or soya based protein sources impact on profile of 'motivation to eat' both within a day and between days ?

• Do biomarkers of satiety alter differentially on meat or soya HPWL diet, as measured by monitoring alteration in plasma amino acids and gut-related hormones ?

• How does a vegetarian and meat-based weight loss diet impact on nitrosamine excretion in faecal samples, as an indicator of faecal toxicity?

Previous work has indicated that high-protein (30% protein) weight loss diets are more satiating (produce less hunger) than normal protein WL diet (15% protein) or a diet supplemented with few amino acids. In previous work, a mixed source of protein has been used, mainly from meat (beef, chicken, fish). These types of diets have been criticised because of the potential negative side effects, including our own work on gut health. It might be that alternative vegetable sources of protein could fulfil the diet remit, to be satiating and yet still allow weight loss, and maintain a healthy gut.

Design -within subject, randomised cross-over design after day 3. Each subject acts as their own control and will receive each treatment. 18-20 subjects to participate.

Length of time - Conduct the two nutritional interventions over a period of 14 days, in order to reduce effects due to an acute change in nutritional intake.

PROTOCOL Days 1- 3 - Normal Protein Maintenance diet (NP- MTD, 3 days)

1. st ARM Days 4-17 - randomised to High Protein-Weight loss-Meat (HP-Soya,14 days),

2. nd ARM Days 18-31 - randomised to High Protein-Weight loss-Soya (HP-meat,14 days),

Clinical Trial Description

From literature we know that:

• Within-day experiment feeding myco-protein (quorn) versus chicken at lunch resulted in an 18% reduction in evening meal ad libitum intake following the quorn meal (Burley, P. Blundell, 1993, Eur J Clin Nutr, 409-18).

• Feeding casein, soy, pea, wheat gluten, egg albumin, gelatin as part of a mixed meal had no influence on post-lunch satiety (Lang et al.,1998, Am J Clin Nutr., 1197-204).

• Varying protein source (soy, caseine, gelatin) at breakfast meal at 1.8 and 3.6MJ/meal had no impact on 24 hour energy or macronutrient intakes (Lang et al., 1999, Eur J Clin Nutr, 959-65).

• Comparison of mycoprotein and tofu to a chicken preload before lunch indicated that the vegetarian sources were associated with lower food intake at lunch (Williamson et al., 2006, Appetite, 41-8).

• Addition of 25g protein in a liquid format (whey and soy) led to suppression of food intake (pizza meal) 1 hour later, in comparison to water and whey preload.

It is noted that all of these studies, (i) were conducted over a short time period (within day), (ii) none were high-protein weight loss diets (low calorie, high protein), (iii) none compared mixed meat versus vegetable source. It is of interest from both a scientific and public health point of view whether meat and vegetarian sources of protein similarly impact on motivation to eat.

The diets for this study:

• The maintenance diet (MTD) (day 1 - 3) will consist of 15% protein, 30% fat and 55% carbohydrate fed to 1.5 x RMR (resting metabolic rate)

• The high protein (HP) weight loss diet will be fed to 100% resting metabolic rate (RMR) on a 5 day rotation menu, fed as three meals a day, 30% protein, 30% fat and 40% carbohydrate; the meat version will be based on chicken and beef meat; the soya version based on soya protein or soya-tvp (textured vegetable protein).

Soya protein is now widely available as milk (ALPRO), margarine (PURE), enhanced bread (BURGEN), sausages (GRANOSE), bacon (GRANOSE), burgers (GRANOSE), mince (GRANOSE), powered isolate, cheese, cream (SOYA DREAM), yoghurt (ALPRO), chicken-style fillets (GRASSINGTONS). ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Open Label

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Obesity
• Weight Loss

• NCT number: NCT02080325
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: University of Aberdeen
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 2009
• Completion date: December 2010