View clinical trials related to NSTEMI.
Filter by:Radial approach is widely established in cardiac diagnostic and therapeutic treatments. It has been shown to decrease bleeding, vascular problems, and mortality rates when compared to the femoral approach. It also offers better comfort to patients through early mobility and lowers hospital expenses. Previously, there were no specific devices for radial artery hemostasis. Many different types of dressings were used in various hospitals with no standardization. This raises the question of whether specific devices surpass dressings in terms of patient comfort, time required to maintain hemostasis, and vascular complications. The primary goal of this study was to examine the effectiveness of compression dressings and hemostatic wristbands on patients undergoing cardiac procedures via radial approach in terms of patient comfort, time required to maintain hemostasis, and vascular problems. The hemostatic wristband TR BandR (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was utilized in one group, while compressive elastic dressing, standardized as 13 threads gauze overlapped, opened, longitudinally pleated once and wrapped, making a 5-cm long cylinder, 1-cm in height, was used in the other.
Prospective (analysis of retrospective data), multi-center, observational, single-arm study. This structure was selected as the "worst case" due to the fact that it represents real life usage of invasive FFR measurement is performed mostly in "gray zone" cases, which are that their severity cannot be determined intuitively and based on the physician eyeball. By using real-world historical data of invasive FFR, the analysis of the obtained data can ensure that the study results are expected to include invasive FFR results that are in the grey zone, when invasive FFR is used in real life and represent the real expected use of the product. Furthermore, the analysis of the data obtained in the studies with these similar devices measuring FFR obtained from angiograms was actually performed in a retrospective manner. That is, although the angiographic images and pressure wire recordings were obtained in real-time, due to the need to mark the vessel in real-time and obtain specific projections during the procedure without which the FFR cannot be calculated, the primary endpoint (sensitivity and specificity) and accuracy were determined in all studies by a post-hoc review by a similar independent QCA core laboratory. The invasive FFR data, as well as the software generated FFR data were reviewed post-hoc by a core laboratory or even at the company.
Elderly individuals are increasingly represented among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and an oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitor has an established role in the prevention of atherothrombotic events in ACS setting. However, DAPT in older patients is challenged by a concurrent heightened risk of ischemia and bleeding. Although guidelines recommend DAPT with aspirin and ticagrelor for elderly patients with ACS, clopidogrel, a less potent antiplatelet agent, continues to be used in more than one third of ACS patients with elderly status being the strongest predictor of undertreatment. A lower dose of ticagrelor may represent an alternative to the standard dose by conferring a similar efficacy and, potentially, a better safety profile. Our prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial will test the hypothesis that a lower dose of ticagrelor provides similar antiplatelet effects compared with a standard dose among elderly patients with ACS. The main aim of the trial is to determine the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily versus ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily among elderly patients with ACS undergoing PCI. This will be a prospective, randomized (1:1 ratio), non-inferiority, open-label, crossover trial to evaluate the level of platelet inhibition achieved with a low-dose of ticagrelor (60 mg twice daily) versus a standard dose of ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) among elderly patients with ACS undergoing PCI.
The study included all patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the district hospital and sent to the angiographic Department for diagnosis and performance of PCI with a diagnosis of NSTEMI, including myocardial infarction (mi) and unstable angina, determined by clinical data, ECG signs and laboratory indicators. Data from patients living in the Sergiev Posad municipal district will be analyzed in order to achieve maximum registration of adverse events during one year of follow-up.
This study aims to evaluate the beneficial effect of heart rate reduction of oral ivabradine in patients presenting with non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) during acute stage post percutaneous coronary intervention versus conventional treatment. Materials and methods: A total of 100 patients admitted to the emergency department, National Heart Institute, Cairo, Egypt were randomized into two groups as follows: Group A: 50 patients with NSTEMI treated with ivabradine (5mg twice daily) in addition to the conventional treatment; Group B: 50 patients with NSTEMI treated with the conventional treatment only. Demographic data, detailed history, clinical examination, chest pain onset, blood pressure, heart rate (HR), temperature and respiratory rate, electrocardiogram (ECG) as well as echocardiography and laboratory investigations were recorded. Patients were monitored for a period of 3-5 days (acute stage).
This study will be a single-center, prospective, un-blinded, randomized controlled trial evaluating a decision aid tool for older patients considering left heart catheterization (LHC) as treatment for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The study population is 50 total inpatients (25 per study arm) with NSTEMI eligible for elective LHC. The first arm is the control group that will receive standard of care, while the second arm will have access to the decision aid and shared-decision making conversation with one of the co-investigators. Baseline characteristics and surveys/questionnaire data will be collected after study intervention (as applicable), and prior to final decision regarding LHC. Statistical analyses will be conducted on the primary endpoint, decisional conflict score, as well as on various secondary endpoints.
The purpose of this study is to determine if early diagnosis and risk stratification acquired through pre-hospital clinical assessment, 12-lead electrocardiogram and point of care biomarkers will facilitate enhanced triage and treatment in patients with presumed non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEMI).
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Cre8 (CID) Drug Eluting Stent, studied 3 months after implant, compared to Vision/Multilink8 Bare Metal Stent (Abbott) studied at 1 month, in terms of neointimal coverage, determined by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), as percentage of cross-sections with RUTTS (Ratio of Uncovered to Total Stent Struts Per Cross Section) score ≤ 0.3.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Drug-Eluting Balloon first and then bare metal stent compared with drug-eluting stent for treatment of de novo lesions (DEB first).
The aim of the present trial is to assess the efficacy of the standalone use of SeQuent(R) Please coated balloon compared to a bare metal stent (BMS) in patients with NSTEMI.