Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03498014
Other study ID # NIMAO/2017-02/JCB-01
Secondary ID
Status Withdrawn
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 2022
Est. completion date December 2023

Study information

Verified date February 2023
Source Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The investigators hypothesize that opioid prescription guided by patient pharmacogenetic profile will diminish opioid-associated undesirable effects by 50% and improve medication compliance.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Withdrawn
Enrollment 0
Est. completion date December 2023
Est. primary completion date December 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form - The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan - The patient is at least 18 years old - The patient will be available for all visits - Patients suffer from non-cancerous chronic pain according to HAS criteria - Patient not having taking opioids in previous 2 months - Patient indicated for prescription of opioids (oxycodone, codeine or tramadol) or patient not responding to first line treatment Exclusion Criteria: - The subject is participating in an category I interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study - The subject refuses to sign the consent - It is impossible to give the subject informed information - The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship - The patient is pregnant or breastfeeding - The patient is likely to procreate and does not use an effective method of contraception (contraceptive ring, surgical contraception, implant, patch, contraceptive pill, male and female condoms, IUD) - There is a contra-indication for opioid use - Patient with an addiction risk (score = 8 on ORT scale).

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Pharmacogenetic analysis allowing personalized opioid prescription
Genotypic of patient to determine optimal opioid treatment (tramadol, codeine or oxycodone)
Standard opioid prescription
Opioid prescription made without reference to patient genetic profile (tramadol, codeine or oxycodone)

Locations

Country Name City State
France CHU Nimes Nîmes

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups from predefined list Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in Annex 17.5 of the protocol Month 1
Primary Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups from predefined list Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in Annex 17.5 of the protocol Month 2
Primary Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups from predefined list Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in Annex 17.5 of the protocol Month 3
Primary Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Month 1
Primary Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Month 2
Primary Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Month 3
Secondary Number of undesirable events associated to opioid between groups Total number of undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in protocol Month 1
Secondary Number of undesirable events associated to opioid between groups Total number of undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in protocol Month 2
Secondary Number of undesirable events associated to opioid between groups Total number of undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in protocol Month 3
Secondary Number of undesirable events associated to opioid between groups Total number of undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Month 1
Secondary Number of undesirable events associated to opioid between groups Total number of undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Month 2
Secondary Number of undesirable events associated to opioid between groups Total number of undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Month 3
Secondary Compare clinical therapeutic efficacy between groups Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score; value between 1-7 Month 1
Secondary Compare clinical therapeutic efficacy between groups Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score; value between 1-7 Month 2
Secondary Compare clinical therapeutic efficacy between groups Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score; value between 1-7 Month 3
Secondary Compare patient-reported pain between groups Visual analog scare 1-10 Day 0
Secondary Compare patient-reported pain between groups Visual analog scare 1-10 Week 2
Secondary Compare patient-reported pain between groups Visual analog scare 1-10 Month 1
Secondary Compare patient-reported pain between groups Visual analog scare 1-10 Month 2
Secondary Compare patient-reported pain between groups Visual analog scare 1-10 Month 3
Secondary Compare neuropathic pain between groups DN4 score (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions); score between 0-10 Day 0
Secondary Compare neuropathic pain between groups DN4 score (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions); score between 0-10 Month 1
Secondary Compare neuropathic pain between groups DN4 score (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions); score between 0-10 Month 2
Secondary Compare neuropathic pain between groups DN4 score (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions); score between 0-10 Month 3
Secondary Compare benefit/risk ratio of treatment between groups Overall Benefit of Analgesics Score (OBAS); score between 0-32 Month 1
Secondary Compare benefit/risk ratio of treatment between groups Overall Benefit of Analgesics Score (OBAS); score between 0-32 Month 2
Secondary Compare benefit/risk ratio of treatment between groups Overall Benefit of Analgesics Score (OBAS); score between 0-32 Month 3
Secondary Compare quality of life between patients in each group Quality of life Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire; score between 0-100 Day 0
Secondary Compare quality of life between patients in each group Quality of life Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire; score between 0-100 Month 3
Secondary Compare medication compliance between groups Serum concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) Month 1
Secondary Compare medication compliance between groups Serum concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) Month 2
Secondary Compare medication compliance between groups Serum concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) Month 3
Secondary Qualitive comparison of medication compliance between groups Presence/absence of opioids or metabolites in serum Month 1
Secondary Qualitive comparison of medication compliance between groups Presence/absence of opioids or metabolites in serum Month 2
Secondary Qualitive comparison of medication compliance between groups Presence/absence of opioids or metabolites in serum Month 3
Secondary Serum concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) Opioids Risk Tool (ORT): scores of 0-3 (low risk), 4-7 (moderate risk), or = 8 (high risk) Day 0
Secondary Compare observed medication misuse between groups Prescription Opioid Misuse Index (POMI) Month 1
Secondary Compare observed medication misuse between groups Prescription Opioid Misuse Index (POMI) Month 2
Secondary Compare observed medication misuse between groups Prescription Opioid Misuse Index (POMI) Month 3
Secondary Correlation between predicted phenotype and observed metabolic ratios Products/substrate ratio measured by high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-HRMS) Month 1
Secondary Correlation between predicted phenotype and observed metabolic ratios Products/substrate ratio measured by high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-HRMS) Month 2
Secondary Correlation between predicted phenotype and observed metabolic ratios Products/substrate ratio measured by high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-HRMS) Month 3
Secondary Metabolic profile of patients Extensive Metaboliser, Intermediate Metaboliser, Poor Metaboliser or Ultra-rapid Metaboliser according to CYP2D6 phenotype and polymorphism of the glucuronyl transferase gene UGT2B7 Month 1
Secondary Metabolic profile of patients Extensive Metaboliser, Intermediate Metaboliser, Poor Metaboliser or Ultra-rapid Metaboliser according to CYP2D6 phenotype and polymorphism of the glucuronyl transferase gene UGT2B7 Month 2
Secondary Metabolic profile of patients Extensive Metaboliser, Intermediate Metaboliser, Poor Metaboliser or Ultra-rapid Metaboliser according to CYP2D6 phenotype and polymorphism of the glucuronyl transferase gene UGT2B7 Month 3
Secondary Correlation between saliva and plasma concentration of opioids Concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) Month 1
Secondary Correlation between saliva and plasma concentration of opioids Concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) Month 2
Secondary Correlation between saliva and plasma concentration of opioids Concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) Month 3