View clinical trials related to Neoplasms.
Filter by:This randomized pilot clinical trial studies body warming in improving blood flow and oxygen delivery to tumors in patients with cancer. Heating tumor cells to several degrees above normal body temperature may kill tumor cells.
Comparison of Two Formulations of AZD5363 and the Effect of Food on Pharmacokinetic Exposure, Safety and Tolerability
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the ability of PET-MRI and to detect a local site recurrence during the first year of follow-up after RFA or MWA of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) as compared with contrast enhanced (ce) CT and PET-CT. Standard reference will be clear focal uptake in the rim of the lesion on PET-CT, possibly in combination with histology (when available) or clinical follow-up. Secondary outcomes are the inter-observer variability, the ability to diagnose new intrahepatic lesions and in what way PET-MRI is able to influence future treatment compared to PET-CT and ceCT. The patients satisfaction concerning the PET-MRI will be examined with a questionnaire.
This is a 2-part study in patients with advanced solid tumours. Part A will investigate the PK of olaparib in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment compared to patients with normal hepatic function; Part B will allow patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment or normal hepatic function continued access to olaparib after the PK phase and will provide additional safety data.
The surgeon may remove a very small amount of additional tissue compared to what would be removed if you were not enrolled in the study. This tissue may prove to contain tumor or it may contain normal tissue. The surgical cavity will be examined by a special laser pen after the tumor is removed, and if areas of fluorescence are seen, that may indicate tumor cells where the ICG dye collected are still remaining and the surgeon would then remove those. After the tumor and the tissue around it are removed and sent to the laboratory, the tissue may be examined using that same laser pen to see where the cancer cells are and compare that to what the laboratory sees when it looks at the tumor and tissue with a microscope. It is hoped that what the dye shows and what is seen with the microscope will be alike.
To investigate gene expression profile and immunological associated analysis relating to immunotherapy response of patients with malignant tumor presenting malignant cavity effusion after DC-CIK immunotherapy.
The aim of the study is to assess whether in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) the use of a protocol of intravenous fluid therapy combined with goal directed fluid therapy (GDT) is associated with a significant change in morbidity, length of hospital stay and mortality compared to a standard fluid therapy. Patients undergoing CRS and hipec are randomly divided into two treatment groups. The GDT group receive fluid intravenous therapy according to a specific treatment protocol guided by monitored hemodynamic parameters assessed using the arterial pressure signal monitoring to assess stroke volume and cardiac output via an automated pulse contour analysis (Flotrac/Vigileo®); the control group receive the standard fluid therapy (crystalloid and colloid). Fluid therapy regimen is free in the control group and targeted in the GDT group. In both groups, the investigators evaluate the incidence of major abdominal and systemic complications, the total duration of hospital stay, mortality, the total amount of fluids administered, their breakdown (crystalloid/colloid) and the total number of colloid boluses administered.
An open-label, non-randomized, Phase I dose-escalation study designed to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics(PK) /pharmacodynamics( PD) and tumor response profile of BAY1179470 in subjects with advanced, refractory solid tumors
Study design: Multicenter, randomized, open label phase II study Arm A: DOX 4 cycles - Surgery - Follow-up Arm B: DOX 2 cycles - Surgery - DOX 2 cycles - Follow-up Population: Male or female, 18-75 years of age, with a diagnosis of histologically confirmed, potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Sample Size: Planned sample size is 90 patients, 45 patients for each arm (p0=50%, p1=80%, alpha=0.05 (two sides), beta=0.2) Treatment Plan: Treatment will be administered for 4 and 2 cycles before surgery in arm A and B, respectively, and in arm B for a further 2 cycles after surgery unless progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs, or a patient refuses treatment. In such cases patients will go off treatment. 3-6 weeks after the end of the fourth (arm A) or second (arm B) preoperative cycle, patients will undergo surgery. After surgery 3-6 weeks from surgery patients in arm B will receive 2 more cycles. DOX: Docetaxel 35 mg/m2 day 1 and 8 Oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2 day 1 Capecitabine 750 mg/m2 x 2 daily for 2 weeks Cycles repeated every 3 weeks Evaluation criteria: Tumor assessment will be performed according to the RECIST criteria (version 1.1). Duration of Study: Overall study duration: 07/2010- 03/2017 Planned study duration per patient: 5 years
BACKGROUND: - Despite progress, some children and young adults with solid tumors still experience poor survival. - Activated NK cells potently kill autologous pediatric solid tumors, and clinical grade procedures are available to generate large numbers of activated NK cells for adoptive cell therapy. OBJECTIVES: - Primary objectives are: 1) to assess the feasibility of harvesting and expanding activated NK cells to meet escalating dose goals in Cohort A, 2) to assess the toxicity of infusing escalating doses of activated NK cells following lymphodepleting chemotherapy without rhIL15 (cohort A), and 3) to assess the toxicity of infusing NK activated cells with escalating doses of rhIL15 (cohort B) in pediatric patients with refractory malignant solid tumors. - Secondary objectives are: 1) to identify biologically active doses of activated autologous NK cells plus or minus rhIL15 by monitoring changes in NK cell number, phenotype and function, 2) to assess pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of rhIL15 in a pediatric population, and 3) assess antitumor effects and changes in FDG-PET following administration of activated NK cells to lymphopenic hosts plus or minus rhIL15. 4) to evaluate saftey and efficacy of subsequent cycles of autologous NK cell infusions in patients in cohort A who received benefit from the first NK cell infusion. ELIGIBILITY: - Patients in Cohort A: 2-29 years with with refractory pediatric malignant solid tumors, Patients in Cohort B: 2-25 years with refractory pediatric malignant solid tumors. - Adequate performance status and organ function, recovered from toxic effects of prior therapy, no requirement for systemic corticosteroids and no history of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. DESIGN: - All patients receive pre-NK lymphodepleting chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide. - Cohort A receives escalating doses of activated autologous NK cells to identify feasibility of generating cells and tolerability, and potentially identify an MTD. - A1: 1x10(6) NK cells/kg - A2: 1 x 10(7) NK cells/kg - A3: 1 x 10(8) NK cells/kg - If feasibility and acceptable toxicity is demonstrated for all doses in Cohort A, patients enrolled on cohort B will receive activated autologous NK cells plus escalating doses of rhIL15 using the following schema: - B1: 1 x 10(7) NK cells/kg + rhIL15 0.25 mcg/kg/d IV x 10 - B2: 1 x 10(7) NK cells/kg + rhIL15 0.5 mcg/kg/d IV x 10 - B3: 1 x 10(7) NK cells/kg + rhIL15 1 mcg/kg/d IV x 10 - B4: 1 x 10(7) NK cells/kg + rhIL15 2 mcg/kg/d IV x 10 - Three patients will be enrolled at each dose level, with the dose level expanded to 6 if dose-limiting toxicity occurs. An expanded group of 12 patients will be treated at the highest tolerable dose level. DLT toxicity monitoring will continue for 21 days after the NK infusion, or 14 days after the last rhIL15 dose in Cohort B (whichever is later).