View clinical trials related to Musculoskeletal Pain.
Filter by:The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a school-based exercise program on posture, trunk range of motion and musculoskeletal pain in schoolchildren. This study was a Randomized controlled trial. The hypothesis was that the exercise group would have the postural deviations corrected, would have the trunk range of motion increased and would have the prevalence of pain decreased, while the control group would have not. Three schools from Brazil participated. The students that have been included (n=300) were randomly allocated to experimental (EG) or control group (CG). The intervention for EG consisted in a program based on stretching and strengthening exercises, applied twice a week, for eight weeks, with group sessions of 50 minutes. CG did not perform any intervention. Qualitative and quantitative postural evaluation (PAS/SAPO), musculoskeletal pain (self-report) and trunk mobility were collected.
Chronic pain is a common health problem that causes enormous social costs. A common method for treating patients with chronic pain problems are multimodal rehabilitation (MMR), which consists of a combination of physical exercise, cognitive behavioural therapy and work training coordinated in an interdisciplinary team. Our research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of MMR on health, quality of life, physical activity, return to work and health economics, with the long-term goal of developing MMR. We aim also to evaluate predictive factors for good and bad treatment outcomes in order to better adapt the MMR to the patient. The project is based on patient-reported data from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation, which routinely collects data from 40 (2017) Swedish specialist MMR clinics from all parts of the country. We expect increased knowledge of treatment effects and how MMR can be effectively adapted according to the patient's limitations and resources. Our project group is interdisciplinary and is active in nationwide research networks that focus on chronic pain and rehabilitation.
Chronic musculoskeletal pain is a complex medical condition associated with significant distress, disability, and reduction in quality of life. Research has shown that patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain demonstrate attentional biases towards pain-related information. The purpose of this study is to determine whether internet-delivered attentional bias modification, which aims to implicitly train attention away from pain-related information, has beneficial effects upon pain and pain-related distress in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Participants will be randomised to either an attentional training condition, or to a no-training placebo condition. The primary outcome measures are pain intensity and pain interference, and secondary outcome measures include anxiety, depression, pain-related fear and sleep problems. Data will be analysed and reported separately for participants aged 16 - 24 and 25 - 60. It is hypothesized that participants receiving internet-delivered attentional bias modification will show significantly greater reductions in pain and pain-related distress compared to participants receiving placebo training.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a new primary care intervention "Back on Track" as compared to usual primary care in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain in which disability levels are moderate and the role of psychosocial factors to this disability is at maximum low (classified as WPN2).
Purpose: The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether or not the addition of thoracic, pelvic, and hip manual therapy to a standard physical therapy (PT) approach consisting of motor control exercises and lumbar spine manual therapy is better than standard PT alone at improving thoracolumbar spine range of motion (ROM), hip ROM, pain intensity, disability level, and perceived change in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and movement coordination impairments. Hypothesis: In a CLBP subgroup with movement coordination impairments, participants receiving thoracic, pelvic, and hip manual therapy with standard PT will be superior to participants receiving standard PT alone at improving thoracolumbar spine ROM, hip ROM, pain intensity, physical disability level, and perceived change at two, four, and 12 weeks after initiating treatment.
The purpose of this pre and post intervention observational study is to evaluate patient-reported outcomes from an new clinical course which integrates Mindfulness and Acceptance-based approaches from '3rd wave' Cognitive Behavioural Therapy with osteopathic manual therapy treatment for patients with persistent pain. It is being conducted by the British School of Osteopathy (BSO) in London. In Stage 1 (in progress, June 2013 to August 2014), a course was developed for self-referring patients attending the BSO Clinic. In Stage 2 (September 2014 to May 2016), delivery will be expanded to evaluate outcomes for patients attending National Health Service (NHS) General Practitioner (GP) surgeries in South East London. The intervention consists of a pre-course screening interview; a structured course of six, weekly, one-hour treatment sessions for individual patients; and an optional follow-up interview after three months. The evaluation study is being conducted by an independent study team from the National Council for Osteopathic Research. Patients complete a set of standardised questionnaires before the course and after six months to assess self-reported changes in quality of life, well-being, activity levels, mindfulness and use of health resources. A sample of patients will be invited to provide consent for a treatment session to be observed and/or recorded, or to attend a follow-up interview after six months, to evaluate the quality of course delivery. This is an observational study of patient-reported outcomes from a new intervention in a single cohort of patients, so there is no formal study hypothesis but it is anticipated that outcomes will include increased quality of life, well-being, and active engagement with valued activities.
Chronic musculoskeletal pain is an important problem, and treatments are often prescribed in a "trial and error" fashion. Clinicians prescribe a treatment to a patient and then wait and see if the treatment is successful. If the treatment is unsuccessful, they will try a different treatment. The disadvantage to this method is that it may take a long time to find a successful treatment. The purpose of the PREEMPT Study is to test whether using a mobile phone application ("Trialist app") that allows patients and their health care providers to run personalized experiments comparing two pain treatments is more effective than usual care. Patients download the app, and working with their clinicians, set up a personalized trial that makes sense for them. Every day they answer questions to track levels of pain and side effects of treatment, such as fatigue and constipation. Once the personalized trial has ended, the responses to these daily questions on each treatment will be compared. During a regular clinic visit, the patient and the clinician will review visual displays of the results to facilitate treatment decision-making. Approximately 250 patients will be enrolled in the study. Half the patients will use the app and review results with the clinician, and half the patients will continue with their regular care (i.e., will not use the app). The two groups will be compared to see if using the app is successful in improving long term pain outcomes. The goal of the intervention using the Trialist app is to help patients engage actively and collaboratively with their clinicians and identify effective treatments more quickly.
Non-systematized chronic musculoskeletal pains are a frequent reason for consulting in general practice. The possible causes are numerous and sometimes nonspecific. In some cases, the etiologic investigation of patients with non-systematized and chronic musculoskeletal pain can not highlight any organic cause. Several studies have shown a link between these symptoms and vitamin D deficiency, characterized by a blood level of 25 (OH) vitamin D < 20.8ng/ml. This deficit is easy to identify and to correct through proper vitamin D supplementation with few side effects. Nevertheless, it remains unknown and vitamin D deficiency is rarely considered as a possible etiology in patients with chronic pain. We hypothesize that vitamin D supplementation in patients with non-systematized musculoskeletal pain and deficient in vitamin D could improve painful symptoms. We aim to perform a double-blind randomized controlled trial, vitamin D versus placebo, to assess the pain improvement after vitamin D supplementation.
Background: This study is based on an innovative stepped-care protocol for the management of musculoskeletal pain in primary care, which is evaluated in a RCT. The intervention have two core features: it is theory-driven and include systematic tailoring of treatment content. The tailoring is based on a combination of empirically supported behavioural and medical determinants of pain-related disability and patients' individual perceptions on personal goals, facilitators and barriers for health behavior change. In this application, the intervention is labelled tailored behavioural medicine intervention (TBM). Objectives: The aim is to compare effects and cost-effectiveness of a stepped care model including advice and tailored behavioral medicine pain treatment (experimental condition) with a stepped care model including advice and physical exercises (comparison condition) for patients with low back and neck pain and/or widespread pain including fibromyalgia in primary care. A further aim is to characterize patients who benefit/do not benefit from the respective steps i.e. treatments varying in dose and content. Methods: A stratified randomized stepped care design is applied. Stratification is based on primary care center and patient risk profile. A consecutive selection is performed at primary care centers in southern, central and northern Sweden. According to power analysis, 364 participants should be recruited to allow for sub-group analyses. After having received a minimal intervention (step 1) comprising 'stay-active advice', participants scoring >90 on the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (ÖMPQ) are randomly allocated to an eight-week treatment in step 2. The experimental condition includes supervised physical exercises integrated with either (a) graded activity, or (b) hierarchical graded exposure depending on risk profile, i.e. absence or presence of pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance beliefs. The comparison condition includes supervised physical exercises irrespective of risk profile. Primary outcome is pain-related disability complemented with a comprehensive set of secondary outcomes adhering to the IMMPACT recommendations. Assessments will be made by personnel blinded for treatment condition at baseline, after step 1 and 2 respectively, and at 12- and 24-month follow-ups.
The long term goal is to improve the quality and equity of chronic pain treatment among VA patients. The primary objective of this study is to improve pain outcomes among black VA patients with chronic, musculoskeletal (MSK) pain, who experience poorer pain treatment and outcomes than their white counterparts. The work proposed is expected to result in a non-pharmacological intervention, delivered by telephone, designed to reduce pain and improve functioning among black patients with MSK pain, by promoting walking. This intervention is specifically designed to address factors that contribute to MSK pain among black Veterans; however, the investigators expect that it will also benefit non-black Veterans. The proposed research is innovative, in its use of proactive outreach and recent advances in self-regulation strategies (such as Action Planning) to help black Veterans overcome psychological, environmental, utilization-related, and provider-related barriers that contribute to pain.