View clinical trials related to Musculoskeletal Manipulations.
Filter by:MAIN OBJECTIVE: to assess whether an exercise protocol on the lumbar musculature by adding manual therapy techniques on the diaphragm muscle has the same or greater effect on chronic non-specific lumbar pain than an isolated exercise protocol. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the effectiveness of a lumbar exercise protocol in chronic non-specific low back pain in isolation; To evaluate the effectiveness of both therapies in improving joint range in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain and, finally, to assess catastrophism and the avoidance of lumbar mobility when carrying out loaded movements. HYPOTHESIS: that a lumbar exercise protocol combined with manual therapy treatment on the diaphragm is equal or more effective on pain in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain than treatment with the same lumbar exercise protocol in isolation.
Background: Skeletal muscle-type pain is one of the main reasons for consultations in health centers. In Chile, it is estimated that the prevalence reaches 33% in men and 50% in women, increasing considerably with age, with cervical pain being one of the main conditions, estimating that 80% of the population has experienced cervicalgia at some time. lifetime. The main symptom is neck pain and restriction of movement, mainly affecting the mobility of the upper cervical region. Although there are studies evaluating the effectiveness of manual techniques, there are currently no studies evaluating the effects on cervical muscle activity and pressure threshold. Therefore, the objective of the present investigation is to evaluate the immediate effects of a manual therapy technique on the threshold pressure of muscular trigger points and on the muscular activity of the upper cervical region in patients with chronic pain and restriction of cervical mobility. higher. Methods: Clinical trial, randomized, prospective, double-blind study (patient and evaluator). The participants (21 subjects) were divided into 2 groups. The control group will receive a C0-C0 placebo mobilization technique and the experimental group will receive the C0-C1 mobilization technique. In both groups the technique will be carried out by mobilization cycles of 15 seconds and 3 seconds of rest for a total period of 5 min. Pressure threshold, activation of the superficial deep musculature and articular range of the upper cervical region will be measured.
Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis is a clinical syndrome which is characterized by pain. It has been shown to cause changes in the nervous system leading to central sensitization. There are factors involved in this disease such as sex (female) or obesity. The most recommended therapy is physical therapy, but manual therapy is needed to cause changes in central sensitization. Methods: Experimental, prospective, parallel and longitudinal double-blind study, in which two groups are performed: group A (AP mobilizations) and group B (Mulligan's mobilizations). Different variables and questionnaires were used: pressure pain threshold, temporal summation, pain modulation, central sensitization inventory, WOMAC, Times Up & GO, numerical rating scale, Beck, STAI, kinesiophobia, catastrophism, Barthel and mini- cognitive test
This study evaluated the additive effect of myofascial release therapy on the brachial biceps on conventional management (TENS) in pain intensity, hand prehensile strength and upper limb functionality of individuals with lateral epicondylalgia.
The mechanism responsible for improvement following manual physical therapy techniques is unknown. Previous studies have indicated both biomechanical and neurophysiologic effects which may be responsible for clinical changes observed. Yet, other studies report clinical changes following sham interventions. Through a mixed-methods design, this study aims to gain more understanding of the social and contextual factors that may be related to the improvement often observed following manual therapy techniques.
No studies have investigated the effects of a supine thoracic spine manipulation (TSM) on neurodynamic mobility, as compared to a sham intervention. This study aims to determine the immediate effects of TSM on the Upper Limb Provocation Test (ULPT) and Seated Slump Test (SST) compared to a sham intervention in asymptomatic subjects with neurodynamic limitations.
The purpose of the current randomized clinical trial was to analyze the effectiveness of craniosacral therapy on disability, pain intensity, kinesiophobia, quality of life, isometric endurance of trunk flexor muscles, mobility, and oxygen saturation, blood pressure, cardiac index, and biochemical estimation of interstitial fluid in individuals with chronic low back pain.