View clinical trials related to Migraine Disorders.
Filter by:Physiology of migraine involving renin-angiotensin systems (RAS) has been implicated. Ramipril is a broadly-used angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. The investigators attempt to test the efficacy of ramipril on the prophylaxis of migraine attacks.
Migraine is one of the commonest neurological disorders, affecting up to 12% of the general population, but remains relatively under-diagnosed and under-treated. Migraine has a wide socioeconomic impact and brings a large economic burden; estimates suggest that disability due to migraine costs > €27 billion per annum across Europe. Despite its prevalence and impact, migraine pathophysiology is poorly understood. A wider understanding of the functional changes in this disorder would be beneficial to both diagnosis and treatment. Saccades are the rapid eye movements we make when moving the eyes to a new object in our visual field. Reaction time studies have been used to investigate Huntington's disease and Parkinson's disease with great success. These use saccadic tasks (monitoring eye movements). Even at rest we make approximately three saccades per second, so a lot of data can quickly be gathered with non-invasive testing. We hope to understand more of the underlying mechanisms of migraine by studying reaction time in migraine patients. Our previous pilot study, with less stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria, looked at fewer patients (32 migraineurs and 32 controls), and found that migraineurs showed significantly different saccadic patterns to non-migraineurs. This study firstly seeks to corroborate the saccadometric findings of our earlier pilot study in a group of migraineurs, and secondly to explore the specificity of these findings in migraine by also studying patients with another primary headache syndrome, namely cluster headache. Migraine is known to be a dynamic disorder, with previous studies showing longitudinal changes in the migraine brain. To explore this further we hope to record longitudinally (Every day for 21 days) in a small subset of migraineurs to identify potential longitudinal changes in saccadic reaction time. Because of the portability of the equipment this could be done in the subjects own home if they preferred.
The purpose of this study is to determine if milnacipran taken twice daily is effective in reduction of headache pain.
The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the effect of catheter ablation on incidence, prevalence and disease-severity of migraine in AF patients undergoing ablation, with or without a history of migraine.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a fixed-dose combination of naratriptan + naproxen is effective compared each monotherapy for the acute treatment of migraine.
This will be a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, two period cross over study of ibudilast in the treatment of chronic migraine. For participants resident in Adelaide, South Australia (i.e. "local participants"): The study will involve a screening visit followed by eight visits to the Pain and Anaesthesia Research Clinic (PARC), within the Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH), for baseline testing, initiation of the study medications and ongoing data collection (one baseline and three study visits during each treatment period). At the baseline visit, blood samples to assess biomarkers (glutamate, calcitonin gene-related peptide, glial fibrillary acidic protein and S100β) will be taken. Patients will then be randomised (in a 1:1 ratio) to commence either ibudilast or placebo treatment, which will continue for 8 weeks. Subsequently participants will undergo a 4-week washout period. At the end of the washout period a second 8-week treatment block with the alternative treatment will commence. Patients will complete a headache diary daily for at least 4 weeks prior to the baseline visit, throughout the treatment and washout periods and for 4 weeks after treatment ceases. The diary will record headache frequency, duration, intensity, pain characteristics and medication intake for comparison with baseline data. From screening until the final study visit (over a minimum of 6 months) a total of approximately 200 mL in blood samples will be taken from each local participant. For participants located in country or interstate locations: The same study will be undertaken, but instead of attending the Pain and Anaesthesia Research Clinic (PARC), within the Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH) for screening and study visits, these will be managed remotely through: basic input from the participant's GP during the screening period correspondence with the PI and study staff via registered post, phone or Skype scheduled visits to the nearest pathology collection centre for blood biochemistry and haematology analysis Interstate or country participants will also be exempt from collection of blood samples for biomarker analysis, hence a total of approximately 120 mL of blood samples will be taken from each interstate or country participant.
Patients who report that exposure to bright light or strenuous physical activity will induce migraine aura will be provoked using one or both of these methods. Followingly the patients will be examined by functional MRI. Íf the patients develop migraine headache, MR angiography will be performed as well. The primary study hypothesis is that the functional MRI signal will show features similar to those of the electrophysiological phenomenon of cortical spreading depression.
Recently, there is evidence that endothelial activation and dysfunction are associated with migraine, especially in female migraineurs with aura. Our objectives were to determine whether novel endothelial function markers are altered in female migraineurs with aura compared to age-matched controls.
The hypothesis of this study is that Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) induces headache and dilatation of brain vessels in migraine patients without aura.
The goal of this study is to measure medical resource utilization, treatment patterns, and costs for 1.) triptan-naïve patients with new pharmacy claims for a combination treatment of sumatriptan and naproxen sodium (SumaRT/Nap) or single-entity triptan and 2.) patients who are switched from one triptan to either SumaRT/Nap or a different single-entity triptan. The analysis will compare the mean number of prescription tablets used (including triptans, NSAIDs, opioids, and ergots) and migraine-specific medical resource utilization/costs and pharmacy costs incurred by health plan members who switched to SumaRT/Nap from a single-entity triptan. The null hypothesis for the triptan-naïve analysis is that no difference will be observed between resource utilization and costs incurred by patients treated with SumaRT/Nap and those treated with a single-entity triptan. The test hypothesis is that one group will incur significantly fewer costs and/or significantly lower health care utilization. For the triptan switch analysis, the null hypothesis is that no difference will be observed in the costs or health care utilization between triptan patients who are switched to SumaRT/Nap compared with those switched to a new triptan. The test hypothesis is that one treatment group will experience significantly lower costs and/or lower health care utilization. The source of data for this analysis is the Lifelink Health Plan Claims Database (owned by IMS Health, Inc). This claims database includes more than 60 million covered lives. In addition to inpatient and outpatient records, this database includes standard and mail-order pharmacy claims with paid and charged amounts and dates of service. Data from July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009 (study period) will be used to conduct these retrospective analyses. Patients with at least one pharmacy claim for SumaRT/Nap between January 1, 2009 and June 30, 2009 (enrollment period) will be identified. The date of the first SumaRT/Nap pharmacy claim will be the index date for those patients. Each patient will be propensity score matched with an oral triptan patient based on the following pre-index covariates: age; gender; payer; geographic region; average monthly number of tablets of triptans, NSAIDs, and opioids; and average number of hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and physician visits in the month immediately preceding the index date as well as the mean number of hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and physician visits in the 5-month pre-index period. SumaRT/Nap patients and their single-entity matched controls who had no pharmacy claims for triptans prior to the index date will be analyzed in the triptan naïve group, and the SumaRT/Nap patients and their single-entity matched controls who switched to a new triptan will be analyzed in the switch analysis.