View clinical trials related to Migraine Disorders.
Filter by:This was a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of multiple doses of ESL as prophylactic treatment in subjects with migraine with or without aura. Subjects were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive placebo, ESL 800 mg/day once daily (QD), or ESL 1200 mg/day QD.
The purpose of this study is to show the efficacy of promethazine in management of patients with moderate to severe migraine
This small study is to investigate the efficacy of Acthar in the treatment of chronic migraine in patients who have failed multiple treatments, including Botox (which is defined as having <30% reduction from baseline in the number of headache days per month). Despite the widespread use of anti-seizure medications, there remain a significant number of patient whose migraines are refractory to these agents. The pathophysiology of migraine is such that the neural substances calcitonin G related protein (CGRP), substance P, and neurokinin A are released at the trigeminal nerve endings innervating the large cranial and dura mater blood vessels and this neurotrasmission generates migraine associated pain. Because of this, treatment for migraine can be directed towards down regulating those receptor sites accordingly. Acthar may provide pain relief through this mechanist, as ACTH has been shown to inhibit the release of CGRP and may also provide relief through a negative feedback loop as exogenous ACTH inhibits CRH release and mast cell degranulation.
The investigators propose to test the efficacy of ketorolac nasal spray versus sumatriptan nasal spray versus placebo for acute abortive therapy of migraine head pain as well as for migraine associated symptoms including nausea and allodynia.
Headache disorders are prevalent, disabling, under recognized, under diagnosed and under treated. Migraine has a prevalence of 10% in men and 25% in women in Canada. The treatment of migraine is based on patient education (lifestyle habit modification, trigger avoidance), and pharmacological acute treatment and prophylaxis. A multidisciplinary approach allows a repartition of tasks between different health professionals. In a 2010 meeting, the Canadian Headache Society members supported the concept of Headache Centers, and a headache nurse was judged as an essential component of such centers. Gaul has reviewed the structured multidisciplinary approach that could be used in a headache centre and the existing studies using such structures. Five studies did include a headache nurse. No study did observe the impact of a nurse only. Resources in medical care are limited. One study did use a program of 96 hours, which does not seem realistic on the long-term and for a large pool of patients in a public hospital. Patients are not always able to pay for paramedical help such as physiotherapy and psychotherapy. Even if they do, finding a specialized therapist for chronic headache is difficult. Defining the role of a nurse and demonstrating the impact on patient care is therefore a first step in the concept of a headache center. Possible roles of a headache nurse according to Gaul are patient education, follow-up of the treatment plan, addressing patient queries, and monitoring of patient progress. The headache nurse may also participate in research projects. In a hospital Headache Clinic, the nurse may be involved in intra-venous treatments and blood sampling for research. In summary, evidence to demonstrate the impact of a nurse in a headache clinic is lacking. We propose to study this aspect prospectively. A study with positive findings would encourage health ministers to fund and support headache nurses for headache centers across Canada for headache management. Chronic headache and therefore chronic migraine would be a focus of such centers, since most patients seen in specialized centers are chronic. HYPOTHESIS: The addition of a headache nurse to the headache team will help the CHUM Migraine Clinic to improve treatment outcome, and reduce the burden of headache. This multidisciplinary approach will also allow a higher efficiency of the team.
Migraine is a very common, chronic/intermittent and disabling neurovascular headache disorder that has long believed to have no severe consequences. Recent evidence, however, strongly suggest that migraine is associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke and there is initial evidence that migraine is associated with structural brain changes independent of the occurrence of stroke. As migraine has strong links with the vascular system, it is plausible that vascular functions interact on the association between migraine and structural brain changes as well as cognition. Our primary objectives are to investigate: (i) the relationship of migraine and migraine subtypes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes in a cohort of patients with active migraine; (ii) the relationship of migraine on cognitive performance among patients with active migraine; and (iii) the relationship of migraine and migraine specifics with vascular functions and morbidity. As secondary objective, we investigate whether the association of migraine on structural brain changes or cognitive performance is modified by vascular functions. This will be an observational study conducted in the Headache Center in Bordeaux. 300 patients have to be included (150 patients with migraine with aura and 150 patients with migraine without aura). Inclusion criteria are: all patients with a clearly defined migraine (as per IHS[International Headache Classification] criteria) who are aged 30 and older, are able to fluently speak French, and who are willing to participate. Exclusion criteria are: pregnant woman and patient who have a major psychiatric disease or major anxiety disorder or had a pacemaker (which would not allow to perform a MRI imaging). The cognitive status in the patient cohort will be ascertained by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). In addition to the RBANS, we will use the HIT-6 (Headache Impact Test) and MIDAS (MIgraine Disability ASessment) and the depression scale CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Vascular risk status will be assessed by measurement of blood pressure and reports of vascular risk factors. The endothelial function will be measured with a noninvasive Peripheral Arterial Tone (PAT) signal technology using the EndoPAT device (Itamar Medical Inc, Framingham, MA). For crude comparisons, chi-square tests will be used for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. Multivariable-multinominal modeling techniques will be utilized for the comparisons adjusting for potential confounding variables. All statistical tests will be two-tailed and a P <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topiramate in participants with migraine (type of severe headache that occurs periodically and is often associated with nausea, vomiting and constipation or diarrhea) who completed the JNS019-JPN-02 study.
The purpose of this study is to determine which drug makes lower migraine headache
The purpose of this research study is to examine whether a one-day group workshop, integrating principles from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with Migraine Education, will result in improvements in depressive symptoms and functioning impairment in patients with comorbid migraine and depression.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) using the Boston Scientific Corporation (BSC) Precision™ System in the management of intractable chronic migraine, when used in conjunction with anti-migraine medications.