View clinical trials related to Metastatic Liver Cancer.
Filter by:This clinical trial aims to use the patient-derived organoid (PDO), Patient-derived organoids-tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte coculture system (PDO-TIL) and patient-derived organotypic tissue spheroids (PDOTS) to simulate the tumor microenvironment in cancer patients. The culture system can be used for pre-clinical validation of drugs and screening of drugs to treat sensitive people and provide individualized treatment for patients with liver cancer. This model is used to explore the molecular mechanism of drug resistance and to find intervention strategies to further improve the response rate of drugs. This study is expected to provide an ideal platform for drug screening and drug resistance research in liver cancer patients, which can replace experimental animal models, and guide personalized medication for liver cancer patients, so as to improve the overall prognosis of patients.
Recurrence of liver metastasis in colorectal cancer after R0 resection is mainly due to the invisible minimal residual disease, which are the main factors leading to metastasis and recurrence. Positive circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is the direct evidence of the minimal residual disease (MRD). In recent years, Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Immunotherapy (CAR-T) has made great breakthroughs, and has achieved good therapeutic effects in hematological tumors, but the research on solid tumors is limited. CEA expression is generally elevated in gastrointestinal tumors and is associated with high aggressiveness of tumors. At present, solid tumor cell therapy targeting CEA has been carried out at home and abroad, and has achieved certain efficacy. Anti-CEA CAR-T cells targeting CEA have been constructed in the pre-clinical study of this project, and the pre-clinical study results suggest good safety and effectiveness. Formation of minimal residual disease is associated with circulating blood in the residual tumor cells. Using this feature, this project intends to conduct a phase I clinical study on patients with minimal residual disease /positive ctDNA after R0 resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis, so as to conduct preliminary exploration of anti-CEA CAR-T cell therapy, evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the therapy, determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and provide guidance for subsequent drug dosage and clinical trials.
This is an open-label, dose escalation, multi-center, Phase I/II clinical trial aimed at assessing the safety and preliminary efficacy of an investigational ARTEMIS® ECT204 T-cell therapy. The trial is suitable for adult subjects (≥ 18 years of age) diagnosed with GPC3-positive HCC, who have failed or not tolerated at least two (2) different anti-HCC systemic agents. Phase I has concluded and a Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D) has been determined. We are now conducting Phase II to further confirm the safety profile of ECT204 and evaluate its efficacy.
DCE-CT of thoracic tumors as an early biomarker for treatment monitoring in comparison with morphologic criteria. 1. Rationale of the clinical investigation For the evaluation of response to anti-tumoral therapy in thoracic tumors, merely morphologic information is often not sufficient for early response evaluation as dimensions of the oncologic lesions are not changing during the first weeks of treatment. To be able to measure functional changes, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) seems promising as a biomarker for early therapy monitoring. Having an early biomarker for treatment monitoring will allow to increase patients' prognosis if a non-responder is earlier detected, will optimize the use of expensive treatments, is expected to shorten hospitalization and shorten absence at work, and to decrease side-effects of (adjuvant) medication. 2. Objective of the study 2.1.Primary objectives The primary objective is to investigate the potential of functional imaging (i.e. DCE-CT), as analyzed by the Hyperfusion analytic software, as an early biomarker for the evaluation of therapy response in primary thoracic malignancy. 2.2.Secondary objectives There are two secondary objectives: 1. To define internal system parameters and perfusion parameter thresholds that maximize the accuracy of the outcomes and to define the correct category (PD, SD, PR, CR); and 2. To compare the predicted categorization to the assessed RECIST1.1 categorization. 3. Endpoints 3.1.Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint is to directly compare the biomarker of the HF analysis software at week 3 (+- 1 week) and week 8 (+- 3 weeks) with the eventually reported Progression-Free Survival (PFS) intervals and Overall Survival (OS) in this study. PFS intervals are determined by the clinician and are based on RECIST1.1 and additional clinical and biochemical progression markers. The focus will be on evaluating the accuracy of the prediction as well as how early the prediction was correct. 3.2.Secondary Endpoints There are two secondary endpoints corresponding to the two secondary objectives. 1. The internal parameters for the HF biomarker, e.g. magnitude of the Ktrans decrease, and the change in volume of unhealthy tissue, need to be determined to define the classification (PD, SD, PR and CR) by the HF analysis software. These parameters are optimized to optimally predict the classification according to PFS and OS. This will be done by splitting the data into a train and test set to ensure generalization. 2. The classification of the HF analysis software will be compared to the purely morphological classification by RECIST1.1 to identify correlation. Furthermore, some cases will be investigated where the HF analysis performs noticeably better or worse than RECIST1.1 in predicting PFS and OS. Finally, the difference in time to the first correct prediction is compared between HF and RECIST1.1. 4.Study Design This prospective study is part of the clinical β-phase. We aim to test pre-release versions of the Hyperfusion.ai software under real-world working conditions in a hospital (clinical) setting. It is important to note, though, that the results of the software analysis will not be used by interpreting physicians to alter clinical judgement during the course of the clinical trial. A prospective study including 100 inoperable patients in UZ Gent suffering from primary thoracic malignancy (≥15mm diameter) will be conducted. For this study, in total 3 CT scan examinations of the thorax will be performed (a venous CT examination of the thorax in combination with a DCE-CT scan of the tumoral region). All patients will be recruited from the pulmonology department. Oncologic patients are clinically referred with certain intervals for a clinically indicated CT scan (being part of standard care). In the study, two clinical CT examinations that are performed standard of care (baseline CT examination and CT examination at week 8 (+- 3 weeks) after start of systemic therapy) will be executed by also adding a DCE-image of the lung adenocarcinoma to this examination. This DCE-image is performed during the waiting time before the venous/morphologic phase. Consequently, from a clinical point-of-view, the time to scan remains exactly the same. With regard to the contrast agent, an identical amount is injected as is the case in standard of care, but the contrast bolus is split in two parts - see also addendum with DCE protocol. In this study there is one additional CT-examination (DCE-scan of the thoracic malignancy in combination with venous CT scan of the thorax) at week 3 (± 1 week).
Open-label, dose escalation, multi-center, Phase I/II clinical trial to assess the safety/tolerability and determine the recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D) of ET140203 T-cells in pediatric subjects who are AFP-positive/HLA-A2-positive and have relapsed/refractory HB, HCN-NOS, or HCC.
Multicentric prospective and observational study to assess the 5-year overall survival in a cohort of patients with unresectable liver-only colorectal metastases, well controlled by chemotherapy prior to liver transplantation.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ET 140202 -T cell combined With TAE or Sorafenib in the treatment of liver cancer
Observation on acupoint electric stimulation combined with tropisetron in preventing and treating nausea and vomiting and improving the patient's appetite after TACE for primary or metastatic liver cancer patients.
Single-arm pilot clinical trial. Patients will be subjected to irreversible electroporation (IRE) as the sole treatment of nodules not considered treatable by resection or thermal ablation.