Capecitabine in Combination With Aromatase Inhibitor Versus Aromatase Inhibitors, in Hormonal Receptor Positive Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients, Randomized Controlled Study

Metastatic Breast Cancer Clinical Trial

— CONCEPT  

Official title:

Capecitabine in Combination With Aromatase Inhibitor Versus Aromatase Inhibitors, in Hormonal Receptor Positive Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients, Randomized Controlled Study (CONCEPT Trial)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04012918
• Other study ID #: Combined CTH and HT in MBC
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: Phase 2
• Start date: August 30, 2018
• Est. completion date: February 2021

Study information

• Verified date: July 2019
• Source: Ain Shams University
• Contact: Nada Naguib
• Phone: 01221222573
• Email: nada_naguib[@]yahoo.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Women with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who are hormone receptor positive are candidates for first line hormonal therapy including aromatase inhibitors. In the past few years new combination therapies became available as fulvastrant or palbociclib with letrezole; increasing the progression free survival (PFS). A retrospective study showed that combination of capecitabine with aromatase inhibitors increase PFS as 1st and 2nd line line treatment another prospective study showed the same results. The aim of our study is confirm such data by a randomized controlled trial.

Description:

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide, accounting for 25% of total cancer cases (Globocan, 2012) It ranks as the most prevalent cancer among women in the Middle East and Northern Africa (Ferlay et al., 2015). In Egypt, breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among females (Ibrahim et al., 2014).

Survival of breast cancer patients depends on the disease stage. Most of the patients with localized disease experience long-term disease-free survival. Meanwhile, those who develop metastasis have a 5-year relative survival of only 24% (Siegel et al, 2015). Hormonal receptor positive (HR +ve) represent the most common subset (almost 70%) in both early and advanced disease (Clarke et al., 2012).

It is crucial to determine the menopausal status before initiation of treatment. For HR +ve / Her 2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients who premenopausal; If the patient had Disease free survival (DFS) of 12 months or more, or if she was diagnosed with metastasis de novo, the recommended first line is either ovarian ablation plus tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor (Cardoso et al., 2017). For postmenopausal patients aromatase inhibitors are recommended with median progression-free survival (PFS) between 8 and 10 months (Bonneterre et al., 2000) and 10 months (Paridaens et al., 2008).

Chemotherapy regimens that are prescribed in hormone receptor-positive patients includes microtubule inhibitors (including taxanes and vinca alkaloids), anthracyclines, gemcitabine, cyclophosphamide and capecitabine. But endocrinal therapy is preferred as long as the patient is not in visceral crisis (Cardoso et al., 2017).

Recently new drugs that increased progression free survival (PFS) has been approved in the treatment of HR +ve metastatic breast cancer (MBC) as fulvastrant (Selective estrogen receptor modulator) (Ellis et al., 2015) and palbocilib (Ck4/6 inhibitor) (Finn et al., 2015) as first line and eveirolimus (mTor inhibitor)(Pritchard et al., 2012) as second line.

The optimum sequence of endocrinal treatment and chemotherapy has not been fully clarified, It is of great importance to bear in mind that the goal of treatment in recurrent and metastatic breast cancer is extending the progression free survival (PFS) and sustaining a good quality of life (Cardoso et al., 2017).

A retrospective study by Shankar et al. that compared between combination of capecitabine and aromatase inhibitor (AI) versus capecitabine alone versus aromatase inhibitor alone showed that the median PFS of first-line treatment was significantly better for the combination with PFS 21 months vs 8.0 months for capecitabine and 15.0 months for AI. For second-line treatment, the PFS was longer in the combination compared with capecitabine and Al groups (18 months vs. 5.0 months vs. 11.0 months, respectively) (Shankar et al., 2015).

Alvarado et al, compared combination aromatase inhibitor plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone versus aromatase inhibitor alone. The median PFS of first-line treatment was significantly better for the combination (PFS not-reached for combination vs.3.0 m for capecitabine and 13.0 m for AI, p<0.0001). For second-line treatment, the PFS was longer in the combination compared to capecitabine and AI (PFS not reached vs. 6.0 m vs.13.0 m, respectively, p=0-041) (Alvarado et al., 2012).

In China a Phase II trial assessed the use of of metronomic oral capecitabine therapy combined with aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal metastatic and recurrent breast cancer resistant to first-line aromataseinhibitors and the results showed overall Response Rate (ORR) 70.5% and median PFS 9.57 months (L. Jian-wei et al., 2015). Lee S. Schwartzberg conducted a phase II trial which results showed that fulvastrant with metronomic capecitabine for women with HR-Positive, HER2-Negative MBC has Median PFS was 14.98 months (Schwartzberg et al., 2014).

Capecitabine; being cheaper and more available in economically disadvantaged countries together with the promising results of the previous retrospective trial by Shankar et al and the prospective trial by Alvarado Miranda et al ; further confirmation of such results by a prospective randomized clinical trial is crucial. Currently a phase III trial under the title of "Metronomic Capecitabine Plus Aromatase Inhibitor for First Line Treatment in HR(+), Her2(-) Metastatic Breast Cancer" with the primary results expected to be published on 2021 (Sun Yat-sen University, 2016).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 124
• Est. completion date: February 2021
• Est. primary completion date: August 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Adult women with locoregionally recurrent or metastatic disease not amenable to curative therapy

2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2

3. Hormone receptor positive

4. No prior systemic anti-cancer therapy for advanced ER+ disease ( hormonal therapy)

5. Measurable disease defined by revised RECIST criteria (version 1.1), or bone-only disease

6. normal laboratory values

7. Postmenopausal or premenopausal with oophorectomy (medical or surgical).

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with advanced, symptomatic, visceral spread that are at risk of life threatening complication in the short term

2. Prior (neo) adjuvant treatment with same aromatase inhibitor type with DFI =< 12 months from completion of treatment.

3. Known uncontrolled or symptomatic central nervous system metastases

4. Second primary malignancy

5. Serious uncontrolled intercurrent infections or intercurrent medical or psychiatric illness

6. unable to swallow tablets, or malabsorption patients.

7. unwilling or unable to comply with study protocol or unable to meet the follow up.

8. patients who researchers considered were not suitable to participate.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Breast Neoplasms
• Metastatic Breast Cancer

Intervention

Drug:
• Capecitabine plus aromatase inhibitor
Capecitabine 625 mg/m2 bid PO for 14 days to be repeated every 21 days until progression in combination with aromatase inhibitor if postmenopausal, addition of LHRH agonist will be added if premenopausal.
• A.I.
aromatase inhibitors ( letrozole 2.5 mg PO per day or Anastrozole 1 mg PO per day or aromasin 25 mg PO per day) if post-menopausal, if premenopausal leutnising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist will be added to the aromatase inhibitor

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Clinical oncology department, Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University	Cairo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Ain Shams University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (14)

• Pritchard, K. I. et al. (2012) 'Everolimus in Postmenopausal Hormone- Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer', Nejm, pp. 1-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109653.

Alvarado Miranda, A. et al. (2012) 'Combination treatment with aromatase inhibitor and capecitabine as first- or second-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer.', Journal of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology, 30(15_suppl), pp. e11016-e11016. doi: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e11016.

Bonneterre J, Thürlimann B, Robertson JF, Krzakowski M, Mauriac L, Koralewski P, Vergote I, Webster A, Steinberg M, von Euler M. Anastrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in 668 postmenopausal women: results of the Tamoxifen or Arimidex Randomized Group Efficacy and Tolerability study. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Nov 15;18(22):3748-57. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 20;30(3):343. — View Citation

Cardoso F, Costa A, Senkus E, Aapro M, André F, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Bhattacharyya G, Biganzoli L, Cardoso MJ, Carey L, Corneliussen-James D, Curigliano G, Dieras V, El Saghir N, Eniu A, Fallowfield L, Fenech D, Francis P, Gelmon K, Gennari A, Harbeck N, Hudis C, Kaufman B, Krop I, Mayer M, Meijer H, Mertz S, Ohno S, Pagani O, Papadopoulos E, Peccatori F, Penault-Llorca F, Piccart MJ, Pierga JY, Rugo H, Shockney L, Sledge G, Swain S, Thomssen C, Tutt A, Vorobiof D, Xu B, Norton L, Winer E. 3rd ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3). Ann Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;28(1):16-33. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw544. Erratum in: Ann Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;28(12 ):3111. — View Citation

Clarke CA, Keegan TH, Yang J, Press DJ, Kurian AW, Patel AH, Lacey JV Jr. Age-specific incidence of breast cancer subtypes: understanding the black-white crossover. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jul 18;104(14):1094-101. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs264. Epub 2012 Jul 5. — View Citation

Ellis MJ, Llombart-Cussac A, Feltl D, Dewar JA, Jasiówka M, Hewson N, Rukazenkov Y, Robertson JF. Fulvestrant 500 mg Versus Anastrozole 1 mg for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer: Overall Survival Analysis From the Phase II FIRST Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 10;33(32):3781-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5831. Epub 2015 Sep 14. — View Citation

Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9. — View Citation

Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, Boer K, Bondarenko IM, Kulyk SO, Ettl J, Patel R, Pinter T, Schmidt M, Shparyk Y, Thummala AR, Voytko NL, Fowst C, Huang X, Kim ST, Randolph S, Slamon DJ. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jan;16(1):25-35. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71159-3. Epub 2014 Dec 16. — View Citation

Ibrahim AS, Khaled HM, Mikhail NN, Baraka H, Kamel H. Cancer incidence in egypt: results of the national population-based cancer registry program. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2014;2014:437971. doi: 10.1155/2014/437971. Epub 2014 Sep 21. — View Citation

L., J. et al. (2015) 'Phase II clinical trial of metronomic oral capecitabine therapy combined with aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal metastatic and recurrent breast cancer resistant to first-line aromatase inhibitors', European Journal of Cancer, 51(March), p. S281. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(16)30798-5.

Paridaens RJ, Dirix LY, Beex LV, Nooij M, Cameron DA, Cufer T, Piccart MJ, Bogaerts J, Therasse P. Phase III study comparing exemestane with tamoxifen as first-line hormonal treatment of metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women: the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct 20;26(30):4883-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4659. Epub 2008 Sep 15. — View Citation

Schwartzberg LS, Wang G, Somer BG, Blakely LJ, Wheeler BM, Walker MS, Stepanski EJ, Houts AC. Phase II trial of fulvestrant with metronomic capecitabine for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2014 Feb;14(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Sep 27. — View Citation

Shankar A, Roy S, Rath GK, Julka PK, Kamal VK, Malik A, Patil J, Jeyaraj PA, Mahajan MK. Aromatase Inhibition and Capecitabine Combination as 1st or 2nd Line Treatment for Metastatic Breast Cancer - a Retrospective Analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(15):6359-64. — View Citation

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5. — View Citation

* Note: There are 14 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Progress-free survival	Time from randomization to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause or Intolerable toxicity.	up to 24 months
Secondary	Adverse events	Detailed Description and grading of adverse events	till progression or up to 24 months whichever earlier

External Links

•   Globocan (2012)
•   Sun Yat-sen University (2016) Metronomic Capecitabine Plus Aromatase Inhibitor for First Line Treatment in HR(+), Her2(-) Metastatic Breast Cancer - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov