Metastatic Breast Cancer Clinical Trial
— FIRSTOfficial title:
A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Multicentre, Phase II Study to Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 500 mg With Anastrozole (ARIMIDEX™) 1 mg as First Line Hormonal Treatment for Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Verified date | August 2019 |
Source | AstraZeneca |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of Faslodex (fulvestrant) with Arimidex (anastrozole) in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 205 |
Est. completion date | January 13, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | January 10, 2008 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 45 Years to 100 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Confirmed hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer, postmenopausal women Exclusion Criteria: - Previous treatment for advanced breast cancer (previous treatment for early breast cancer is allowed). |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Research Site | Barretos | |
Brazil | Research Site | Belo Horizonte | |
Brazil | Research Site | Goiânia | |
Brazil | Research Site | Jaú | |
Brazil | Research Site | Rio de Janeiro | |
Brazil | Research Site | Sao Paulo | |
Bulgaria | Research Site | Blagoevgrad | |
Bulgaria | Research Site | Plovdiv | |
Bulgaria | Research Site | Shumen | |
Bulgaria | Research Site | Sofia | |
Bulgaria | Research Site | Sofia | |
Bulgaria | Research Site | Sofia | |
Bulgaria | Research Site | Varna | |
Bulgaria | Research Site | Veliko Tarnovo | |
Bulgaria | Research Site | Vratza | |
Czechia | Research Site | Brno | |
Czechia | Research Site | Brno | |
Czechia | Research Site | Jicin | |
Czechia | Research Site | Ostrava | |
Czechia | Research Site | Praha 4 | |
Czechia | Research Site | Usti nad Labem | |
France | Research Site | Nice | |
France | Research Site | Poitiers | |
France | Research Site | Saint-cloud | |
Italy | Research Site | Napoli | |
Italy | Research Site | Sassari | |
Poland | Research Site | Kraków | |
Poland | Research Site | Olsztyn | |
Spain | Research Site | Barcelona | |
Spain | Research Site | Barcelona | |
Spain | Research Site | Córdoba | |
Spain | Research Site | Lérida | |
Spain | Research Site | Pontevedra | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Derby | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Dundee | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Edinburgh | |
United States | Research Site | Austin | Texas |
United States | Research Site | Duncanville | Texas |
United States | Research Site | Frederick | Maryland |
United States | Research Site | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Research Site | Teaneck | New Jersey |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
AstraZeneca |
United States, Brazil, Bulgaria, Czechia, France, Italy, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Clinical Benefit Rate | A Clinical Benefit (CB) responder is defined as a patient having a best overall response of either complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) for at least 24 weeks evaluated according to modified RECIST. The Clinical Benefit Rate is the percentage of patients with CB. | From randomisation to data cut off (DCO) for primary analysis. The first and the last patients were enrolled on 6 Feb 2006 and 11 Jul 2007 respectively. The DCO for primary analysis was on 10th Jan 2008, 6 months after the last patient was enrolled. | |
Secondary | Objective Response Rate | For each patient with measurable disease at baseline, the determination of the overall response for each visit was carried out using a SAS program per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesion (TL) and non-target lesions (NTLs) and no new lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter of TLs (compared to baseline), no progression of NTLs and no new lesions. Objective response rate is defined as percentage of patients with either CR or PR. | From randomisation to data cut off (DCO) for primary analysis. The first and the last patients were enrolled on 6 Feb 2006 and 11 Jul 2007 respectively. The DCO for primary analysis was on 10th Jan 2008, 6 months after the last patient was enrolled. | |
Secondary | Time to Progression | Time from randomization until earlier of disease progression or death. Progression was defined according to RECIST: a patient is determined to have progressed if they have progression of target lesions, clear progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Progression of target lesions is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum of LD recorded. Kaplan-Meier estimates of median for each treatment are reported. | From randomisation to data cut off (DCO) for primary analysis. The first and the last patients were enrolled on 6 Feb 2006 and 11 Jul 2007 respectively. The DCO for primary analysis was on 10th Jan 2008, 6 months after the last patient was enrolled. | |
Secondary | Time to Treatment Failure | Time from randomization to treatment discontinuation | From randomisation to data cut off (DCO) for 75% treatment failure. The first and the last patients were enrolled on 6 Feb 2006 and 11 Jul 2007. The DCO for 75% treatment failure was on 26 Mar 2010, 32 months after the last patient was enrolled. | |
Secondary | Time to Progression (Investigator Assessed) | Time from randomization to disease progression (investigator assessed) or death from any cause. Progression was defined by investigator opinion, as patients did not have formal RECIST visits in the follow-up period after the data cut off for the primary analysis of the study. | From randomisation to data cut off (DCO) for 75% treatment failure. The first and the last patients were enrolled on 6 Feb 2006 and 11 Jul 2007. The DCO for 75% treatment failure was on 26 Mar 2010, 32 months after the last patient was enrolled. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Withdrawn |
NCT04872608 -
A Study of Letrozole, Palbociclib, and Onapristone ER in People With Metastatic Breast Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT02202746 -
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of the VEGFR-FGFR-PDGFR Inhibitor, Lucitanib, Given to Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02506556 -
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) Alpha iNhibition In Advanced Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05534438 -
A Study on Adding Precisely Targeted Radiation Therapy (Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy) to the Usual Treatment Approach (Drug Therapy) in People With Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03368729 -
Niraparib in Combination With Trastuzumab in Metastatic HER2+ Breast Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04103853 -
Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Proxalutamide Therapy in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT01847599 -
Educational Intervention to Adherence of Patients Treated by Capecitabine +/- Lapatinib
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03147287 -
Palbociclib After CDK and Endocrine Therapy (PACE)
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06062498 -
Elacestrant vs Elacestrant Plus a CDK4/6 Inhibitor in Patients With ERpositive/HER2-negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05383196 -
Onvansertib + Paclitaxel In TNBC
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04095390 -
A Phase Ⅱ Trial of Pyrotinib Combination With CDK4/6 Inhibitor SHR6390 in Patients Prior Trastuzumab-treated Advanced HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04432454 -
Evaluation of Lasofoxifene Combined With Abemaciclib in Advanced or Metastatic ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer With an ESR1 Mutation
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03323346 -
Phase II Trial of Disulfiram With Copper in Metastatic Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05744375 -
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in First-line HER2-positive Locally Advanced/MBC Patients Resistant to Trastuzumab+Pertuzumab
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02924883 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Combination With Atezolizumab or Atezolizumab-Placebo in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2 (HER2) Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (BC) Who Received Prior Trastuzumab and Taxane Based Therapy
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01942135 -
Palbociclib (PD-0332991) Combined With Fulvestrant In Hormone Receptor+ HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer After Endocrine Failure (PALOMA-3)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01881230 -
Evaluate Risk/Benefit of Nab Paclitaxel in Combination With Gemcitabine and Carboplatin Compared to Gemcitabine and Carboplatin in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (or Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer)
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04448886 -
Sacituzumab Govitecan +/- Pembrolizumab In HR+ / HER2 - MBC
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01401959 -
Trial of Eribulin in Patients Who Do Not Achieve Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT04720664 -
Oral SM-88 in Patients With Metastatic HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 |