View clinical trials related to Melanoma.
Filter by:The value of 4D body-to-whole dynamic acquisition in FDG PET / CT to differentiate progression / pseudo-progression during the first therapeutic assessment (PET1) of metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)to predict the progression of the disease..
The recent introduction of anti-PD-1 (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and anti- PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab) immune checkpoint inhibitors revolutionized oncological guidelines. Durable responses and prolongation of survival with these agents come at the price of the development of immune related adverse events (irAEs). Innovative tools are required in order to manage irAEs and to prevent their potential relapse, with the goal to improve the outcome of patients. In this regard, the Investigators aim to develop a multidisciplinary clinical pathway for cancer patients that are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
To characterize and quantify immune cells expressing the Interleukine 4 induced gene 1 (IL4I1) immunosuppressive enzyme in the blood and in tissue of melanoma patients (primary tumor, sentinel lymph nodes and cutaneous metastases). Then, to compare the results obtained in different clinical settings: - in cases of progression of the disease slower or faster compared to the prognosis established by clinical and pathological data - before and after treatments with immunotherapy (anti Programmed Death ligand 1 (anti-PD1) or anti-PD1 and anti Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4)) and / or targeted therapies (BRAF inhibitors and /or methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)).
In view of the fact that neoadjuvant therapy for malignant melanoma is in the exploratory stage, and the current data on neoadjuvant immunology are mainly from European and American populations, it is necessary to carry out clinical trials in the status of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with melanoma in China. Toripalimab has been extensively studied in the field of malignant melanoma, and its effectiveness and safety have been proven. Therefore, the investigators initiated a single-arm exploratory study to investigate the efficacy and safety of Toripalimab in neoadjuvant treatment of patients with BRAF V600 wild-type malignant melanoma.
This study is an open-label, Phase Ib clinical study to evaluate Evaluate the Recombinant Human GM-CSF Herpes Simplex Virus Injection (OrienX010) in Combination with Recombinant Human Anti-PD1 Monoclonal Antibody Injection (JS001) in the Treatment of Stage IV (M1c) Liver Metastasis from Melanoma. This study is planned to enroll approximately 30 patients with Stage IV (M1c) Liver Metastasis from Melanoma who meet protocol requirements. This study is a single-arm clinical trial. All participator will be given OrienX010 in combination with JS001. JS001 injection: 3 mg/kg, IV infusion: Once every 2 weeks ; OrienX010: Maximum injection volume 8 × 10^8 pfu, intratumoral injection: Once every 2 weeks. Treatment will be continuous and extend from first dose of study medication until to complete response, clinical related progression disease (PDr), intolerable AE, or withdrew informed consent or meet other criteria of discontinuation. For patients who have stopped the study treatment and no disease progression, follow-up visits will take place every 3 months after the end of treatment visit until the occurrence of disease progression. If disease progression occurred, the investigator will collect the anticancer treatment information and survival of individuals until 80% death event.
This study is being performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Dacarbazine and OrienX010 therapy in Untreated Patients With Unresectable Stage IIIb/IIIc or Stage IV(Mla/Mlb) Melanoma. The study will be conducted in about 6 centres in China and total 165 patients will be enrolled. All eligible Patients will be randomized between Dacarbazine and OrienX010 in a 1:2 ratio, so 1/3 (55) patients will receive the Dacarbazine and 2/3 (110) patients will receive the OrienX010. During the treatment phase, the patient will receive OrienX010 administration once biweekly or Dacarbazine once every 3 week until to the end of treatment (EOT). The duration of safety follow-up for adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will be to 90 days after the end of treatment. The details please refer to study schema. For patients who have completed the study treatment and no disease progression, follow-up visits will take place every 3 months after the end of treatment visit until the occurrence of disease progression. If disease progression occurred, the investigator will collect the anticancer treatment information and survival of individuals until 80% death event. After the end of study, if patient want to continue receiving the OrienX010 treatment and judged by investigator, sponsor will provide OrienX010 and Dacarbazine for free until disease progression/death or OrienX010 on marketing launch.
This is a Phase 1/2, open-label, non-randomized, 4-part Phase 1 trial to determine the safety profile and identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of INBRX 106 administered as a single agent or in combination with the anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) pembrolizumab (Keytruda).
This is a two-center, prospective continuously accruing longitudinal cohort study in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) or metastatic melanoma eligible for standard anti-PD-1 antibody treatment. The data from this prospective longitudinal cohort will be used in the POINTING (towards patient -tailored cancer immunotherapy supported by a multifaceted predictive signature composed of integrative omics and molecular imaging) KWF Kankerbestrijding project (WP4). The goal of this project is to develop a multifaceted predictive signature, by using new techniques on tumor characteristics before and during treatment with immune therapy. To do so, researchers will use the 'omics' approach. By combining molecular omics comprising genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics with radiomics and molecular imaging a set of factors will arise which can accurately predict the outcome of the treatment. Participants in this cohort will undergo tumor biopsies, venous blood sampling and feces sampling before, during and at the end of standard anti-PD-1 antibody treatment. Also, data derived form routine procedures performed for standard-of-care anti-PD-1 treatment (ao laboratory assessments, CT and FDG-PET) will be collected.
This study is one monocentric, single-arm, open, phase Ⅱ clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Toripalimab monoclonal injection (Tuo Yi) combined with axitinib tablet (Inlyta®) as neoadjuvant therapy for localized mucosal melanoma. Primary objective: To evaluate pathological response (pCR+pPR) rate of Toripalimab combined with axitinib as neoadjuvant therapy for localized mucosal melanoma. The subjects will receive Toripalimab and Axitinib combined therapy after enrollment, and receive operation 2 weeks after the last dose of Axitinib. Toripalimab will be given for a total of 4 cycles (8 weeks), whereas Axitinib will be given for a total of 8 weeks.The subjects can receive Toripalimab for up to one year after the operation.
Radiation therapy has been shown to be very effective at relieving pain caused by bone metastases. However, certain types of cancers such as prostate, breast, kidney, and melanoma can have resistance to radiation, making treatment less successful. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a newer form of focused treatment that gives higher doses of radiation without damage to surrounding organs. It often is used to help control and cure disease, but less commonly as a way to palliate and treat symptoms. This study is looking at using SBRT for the purposes of improving pain caused by bone metastases in prostate cancer, breast cancer, kidney cancer, and melanoma patients. It is theorized that the higher levels of radiation may be able to combat the resistance some tumour cells have to radiotherapy and provide improved pain response to treatment. The investigators are looking to show that SBRT has a role in helping this group of patients deal with painful bone lesions from their cancer without increasing side effects and toxicity from the radiation treatment.