View clinical trials related to Mechanical Ventilation.
Filter by:Sedatives and analgesics are usually given for analgesic, anxiolytic, or sedating purposes for patients with critical illness, while they inevitably inhibit respiratory and circulatory function. Sometimes, patients receive deep sedation to induce hypoventilation or suppress spontaneous respiratory effort. The sedation level in clinical practice is usually assessed with subjective sedation scoring systems, such as the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS). However, studies have found that sedation depth based on RASS is not a reliable marker of respiratory drive during critical illness. In recent years, researchers have proposed to monitor the effects of sedatives and analgesics on respiratory indicators and to implement lung-protective sedation, such as P0.1, Pocc, Pmus, WOB, and PTP. However, different pharmacological characteristics, different depths of sedation, and different sedation regimens among different sedatives and analgesics make a great difference in their effects on respiration. Ciprofol is an analog of propofol, with increased stereoselective effects adding to its anesthetic properties, is increasingly used in the intensive care unit, but its effects on respiration are not well understood. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effects of ciprofol on respiratory patterns, respiratory drive, and inspiratory effort in mechanically ventilated patients.
The goal of this randomized clinical cross-over trial is to compare power dissipation (Pd) during flow-controlled ventilation with either standard of low tidal volume ventilation or compliance guided individualization of ventilator settings. This study is performed in patients scheduled for open abdominal surgery and the primary and secondary outcome parameters are: - power dissipation [J/min] during ventilation calculated by integrating the hysteresis of the tracheal pressure-volume loop - applied mechanical power during ventilation calculated by published formulas [1] - oxygenation of the blood assessed by PaO2/FiO2 ratio - decarboxylation assessed by required respiratory minute volume to maintain normocapnia - comparison of respiratory variables in low tidal volume versus individualized ventilation Participants will randomly receive either low tidal volume (LTV) or individualized flow-controlled ventilation [2]. In the LTV group, the positive end-expiratory pressure will be set to 5 cmH2O and the peak pressure set to achieve a tidal volume of 7 ml/kg predicted body weight. In the individualized group positive end-expiratory and peak pressure will be titrated to achieve the highest compliance [2]. In both groups the flow will be set to achieve normocapnia (PaCO2 35-45 mmHg). After obtaining three consecutive measurements the ventilation strategy will be switched to the alternative regime in a cross-over design and again, three measurements recorded. The investigators hypothesize, that individualized ventilator settings are able to improve ventilation efficiency in terms of a lower required minute volume to maintain normocapnia and thus is able to reduce power dissipation during ventilation. Secondary endpoint will be a comparison of Pd to calculated mechanical power, as a currently accepted surrogate parameter for ventilation invasiveness [2] and also outcome predictor. Additionally, gas exchange parameters such as oxygenation and decarboxylation will be compared between low tidal volume and individualized ventilation.
The goal of this prospective observational study is to describe the incidence of reverse trigger (RT) in mechanically ventilated patients with diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The main questions it aims to answer are: - Real incidence of RT based on continuous monitoring - The response to mechanical ventilatiory adjustments Participants will be included as soon as neuromuscular blockers (NMB)/sedation is stopped or in case of spontaneous respiratory efforts detection, whatever happens first. Continuous monitoring will be performed by esophageal manometry until switch to a pressure support (spontaneous) mode, restart of deep sedation/neuromuscular blockers by medical indication, or death. In order to allow detection of possible RT in patients with ongoing sedation/NMB, mechanical ventilator waveforms will be screened every 1-2 hours by investigators and critical care physicians with at least 1 year of specific training in detection of dyssynchronies.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and propofol on decreasing stress in mechanically ventilated patients by using salivary alpha-amylase as a stress marker.
Inspiratory Muscle Training(IMT) increases the strength and endurance of the inspiratory muscles, exercise capacity, quality of life and reduces the perception of dyspnea. It has been reported in the literature that it also has an effect on mechanical ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. In patients on mechanical ventilation, IMT is applied with modification of trigger sensitivity and with an external device. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of inspiratory muscle training with external device and MV modification on respiratory muscle strength and intubation time
Currently, measurement of transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) using oesophageal and gastric balloons is the gold standard for the assessment of diaphragmatic effort. This technique is relatively invasive and its interpretation may be complex. The diaphragmatic longitudinal strain (LSdi) and strain rate (LSRdi) might provide additional information in the assessment of diaphragmatic effort and movement during SBT, allowing early detection of diaphragmatic dysfunction. Patients will be monitored during a 30-120 minutes SBT consisting of no assistance on the ventilator using CPAP with a pressure level of 0 cmH2O. Parameters to evaluate diaphragm function will include diaphragmatic strain (LSdi and LSRdi), diaphragmatic thickening fraction (TFdi), and airway occlusion pressure (ΔP0.1 and ΔPocc). These parameters will be measured immediately before ('baseline') the SBT, as well as 2 minutes ('early' assessment), 15 ('intermediate' assessment) and 30 minutes ('late' assessment) after the beginning of the SBT.
This is a clinical trial to compare the oxygenation and ventilation performance between manual ventilation and mechanical ventilation when transporting cardiac patients to the ICU.
Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is an assisted mechanical ventilation mode that provides synchronous inspiratory support for patients with spontaneous breathing. PSV divides the work involved in producing ventilation between the ventilator and the patients. The patient inspiratory effort needs close monitoring to avoid inappropriate assistance and maintain favorable patient-ventilator interaction during PSV. Esophageal pressure (Pes)-derived parameters are regarded as golden indicators of inspiratory effort. Based on this precondition, the fraction of PTP generated by the patient during PSV (PTP ratio) can evaluate the inspiratory contribution proportion of ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing. Inspiratory muscle pressure index (PMI) was confirmed to be associated with inspiratory effort and can effectively predict low/high effort. The study tries to explore the relationship between PMI and PTP ratio and find the optimal cut-off value of PMI to predict different PTP ratios. Second, investigators want to verify the safety and validity of PMI-guided PS settings for pressure-support ventilated patients.
Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is an assistant mechanical ventilation mode, that is widely implemented in mechanical ventilation treatment but there are no exact guidelines to guide PS setting. Traditional PS setting strategy (VT/PBW 6-8ml/kg and RR 20-30 breaths/min)has risks of excessive or insufficient assistance. Inspiratory muscle pressure index (PMI) is a noninvasive respiratory mechanical indicator and is available at the bedside. PMI was correlated with inspiratory effort and has the potential ability to predict low inspiratory effort and high inspiratory effort. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the clinical validity of a PMI-guided PS setting strategy. Specifically, the investigators aim to evaluate its impact on inspiratory effort as well as its potential for lung and diaphragm protection. Additionally, the investigators seek to assess the effect of this ventilation strategy on mechanical ventilation outcomes while evaluating the feasibility of our trial protocol.
It is critical to maintain a relatively normal inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation (PSV), the support level should be adjusted to match the patient's inspiratory effort. The inspiratory muscle pressure index (PMI) can reflect the elastic work of the respiratory system at the end of inspiration and has a significant correlation with inspiratory effort, and it has the outgoing advantages of being non-invasive and easy to obtain. Previous studies on PMI were based on physiological research and experimental conditions (PMIref), which require special pressure monitoring devices and software to collect and measure airway pressure. If PMI is going to be used in clinical practice, it is necessary to find a simple measurement method of PMI to replace PMIref. Most ventilators have airway pressure monitoring and end-inspiratory holding functions, and PMI can be measured by freezing the ventilator screen (PMIvent). The overall aim of this study was to determine PMIvent's clinical feasibility and validity for accessing inspiratory effort during PSV.