View clinical trials related to Mechanical Ventilation.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to investigate a specific approach to patient care called a time-limited trial (TLT). This approach is sometimes used for people who develop critical illness and are cared for in an intensive care unit (ICU). A time-limited trial is a plan made together by medical teams, patients with critical illness (if they can take part), and their families or other important people helping to make their healthcare decisions. A time-limited trial starts with a discussion of the patient's goals and wishes. Then, a plan is made to use ICU treatments for a set period of time to give the patient the chance to recover. After this time, the patient's response to treatment will be reviewed to help guide what to do next. Medical teams consider this kind of plan when it is not clear if a patient can recover to a quality of life that is acceptable to him or her. With a time-limited trial, patients, families, and medical teams experience this uncertainty together. The main goal of this study is to find the best way to use TLTs for patients in the ICU who have trouble breathing and need mechanical ventilation to help them breathe. The hypothesis is that optimal time-limited trial delivery will reduce the time patients with acute respiratory failure spend in the ICU and will improve the intensive care unit experiences for their families and clinicians.
Conventional continuous mandatory mechanical ventilation relies on the passive recoil of the chest wall for expiration. This results in an exponentially decreasing expiratory flow. Flow controlled ventilation (FCV), a new ventilation mode with constant, continuous, controlled expiratory flow, has recently become clinically available and is increasingly being adopted for complex mechanical ventilation during surgery. In both clinical and pre-clinical settings, an improvement in ventilation (CO2 clearance) has been observed during FCV compared to conventional ventilation. Recently, Schranc et al. compared flow-controlled ventilation with pressure-regulated volume control in both double lung ventilation and one-lung ventilation in pigs. They report differences in dead space ventilation that may explain the improved CO2 clearance, although their study was not designed to compare dead space ventilation within the group of double lung ventilation. Dead space ventilation, or "wasted ventilation", is the ventilation of hypoperfused lung zones, and is clinically relevant, as it is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and is correlated with higher airway driving pressures which are thought to be injurious to the lung (lung stress). This trial aims to study the difference in dead space ventilation between conventional mechanical ventilation in volume-controlled mode and flow controlled-ventilation.
Currently, measurement of transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) using oesophageal and gastric balloons is the gold standard for the assessment of diaphragmatic effort. This technique is relatively invasive and its interpretation may be complex. The diaphragmatic longitudinal strain (LSdi) and strain rate (LSRdi) might provide additional information in the assessment of diaphragmatic effort and movement during SBT, allowing early detection of diaphragmatic dysfunction. Patients will be monitored during a 30-120 minutes SBT consisting of no assistance on the ventilator using CPAP with a pressure level of 0 cmH2O. Parameters to evaluate diaphragm function will include diaphragmatic strain (LSdi and LSRdi), diaphragmatic thickening fraction (TFdi), and airway occlusion pressure (ΔP0.1 and ΔPocc). These parameters will be measured immediately before ('baseline') the SBT, as well as 2 minutes ('early' assessment), 15 ('intermediate' assessment) and 30 minutes ('late' assessment) after the beginning of the SBT.
This is a clinical trial to compare the oxygenation and ventilation performance between manual ventilation and mechanical ventilation when transporting cardiac patients to the ICU.
Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is an assisted mechanical ventilation mode that provides synchronous inspiratory support for patients with spontaneous breathing. PSV divides the work involved in producing ventilation between the ventilator and the patients. The patient inspiratory effort needs close monitoring to avoid inappropriate assistance and maintain favorable patient-ventilator interaction during PSV. Esophageal pressure (Pes)-derived parameters are regarded as golden indicators of inspiratory effort. Based on this precondition, the fraction of PTP generated by the patient during PSV (PTP ratio) can evaluate the inspiratory contribution proportion of ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing. Inspiratory muscle pressure index (PMI) was confirmed to be associated with inspiratory effort and can effectively predict low/high effort. The study tries to explore the relationship between PMI and PTP ratio and find the optimal cut-off value of PMI to predict different PTP ratios. Second, investigators want to verify the safety and validity of PMI-guided PS settings for pressure-support ventilated patients.
Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is an assistant mechanical ventilation mode, that is widely implemented in mechanical ventilation treatment but there are no exact guidelines to guide PS setting. Traditional PS setting strategy (VT/PBW 6-8ml/kg and RR 20-30 breaths/min)has risks of excessive or insufficient assistance. Inspiratory muscle pressure index (PMI) is a noninvasive respiratory mechanical indicator and is available at the bedside. PMI was correlated with inspiratory effort and has the potential ability to predict low inspiratory effort and high inspiratory effort. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the clinical validity of a PMI-guided PS setting strategy. Specifically, the investigators aim to evaluate its impact on inspiratory effort as well as its potential for lung and diaphragm protection. Additionally, the investigators seek to assess the effect of this ventilation strategy on mechanical ventilation outcomes while evaluating the feasibility of our trial protocol.
The aim of this study is to test the effect of 1week of extracorporeal diaphragm pacing (EDP) combined either with or without tilt table verticalization (TTV) on diaphragm function in patients with mechanical ventilation compared to conventional physiotherapy (CPT).
It is critical to maintain a relatively normal inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation (PSV), the support level should be adjusted to match the patient's inspiratory effort. The inspiratory muscle pressure index (PMI) can reflect the elastic work of the respiratory system at the end of inspiration and has a significant correlation with inspiratory effort, and it has the outgoing advantages of being non-invasive and easy to obtain. Previous studies on PMI were based on physiological research and experimental conditions (PMIref), which require special pressure monitoring devices and software to collect and measure airway pressure. If PMI is going to be used in clinical practice, it is necessary to find a simple measurement method of PMI to replace PMIref. Most ventilators have airway pressure monitoring and end-inspiratory holding functions, and PMI can be measured by freezing the ventilator screen (PMIvent). The overall aim of this study was to determine PMIvent's clinical feasibility and validity for accessing inspiratory effort during PSV.
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare a liberal versus restrictive oxygen supply (fraction of inspired oxygen, FiO2) strategy in patients scheduled for thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation during lung isolation. The primary and secondary outcome parameters are: - oxygenation of the blood after 30 minutes of one-lung ventilation, assessed by PaO2/FiO2 ratio - time to lung collapse after start of one-lung ventilation Participants in the control goup will receive an oxygen content of 100% before lung isolation, which will be subsequently decreased to achieve normoxia or mild hyperoxia (PaO2 of 75-120 mmHg). The intervention group will receive the previous, during two-lung ventilation set, oxygen content and after lung isolation oxygen supply will be increased to secure adequate oxygenation of the blood (PaO2 75-120 mmHg) during one-lung ventilation. The investigators hypothesize, that a higher fraction of inspired oxygen may impede hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction of the collapsed lung and thus decrease overall oxygenation performance during one-lung ventilation. Secondary endpoint will be the time to lung collapse, as a lower fraction of inspired oxygen and thus a higher nitrogen content may impede lung collapse.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is often complicated by Right Ventricular Dysfunction (RVD), and the incidence can be as high as 64%. The mechanism includes pulmonary vascular dysfunction and right heart systolic dysfunction. Pulmonary vascular dysfunction includes acute vascular inflammation, pulmonary vascular edema, thrombosis and pulmonary vascular remodeling. Alveolar collapse and over distension can also lead to increased pulmonary vascular resistance, Preventing the development of acute cor pulmonale in patients with acute respiratory distress. ARDS patients with RVD have a worse prognosis and a significantly increased risk of death, which is an independent risk factor for death in ARDS patients. Therefore, implementing a right heart-protective mechanical ventilation strategy may reduce the incidence of RVD. APRV is an inverse mechanical ventilation mode with transient pressure release under continuous positive airway pressure, which can effectively improve oxygenation and reduce ventilator-associated lung injury. However, its effect on right ventricular function is still controversial. Low tidal volume (LTV) is a mechanical ventilation strategy widely used in ARDS patients. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with LTV, APRV improved oxygenation more significantly, reduced the time of mechanical ventilation, and even had a tendency to improve the mortality of ARDS patients However, randomized controlled studies have shown that compared with LTV, APRV improves oxygenation more significantly and also increases the mean airway pressure. Therefore, some scholars speculate that APRV may increase the intrathoracic pressure, pulmonary circulatory resistance, and the risk of right heart dysfunction but this speculation is not supported by clinical research evidence. In addition, APRV may improve right ventricular function by correcting hypoxia and hypercapnia, promoting lung recruitment and reducing pulmonary circulation resistance. Therefore, it is very important to clarify this effect for whether APRV can be safely used and popularized in clinic.we aim to conduct a single-center randomized controlled study to further compare the effects of APRV and LTV on right ventricular function in patients with ARDS, pulmonary circulatory resistance (PVR) right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling (RV-PA coupling), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR).