View clinical trials related to Macular Edema.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a relationship between inflammatory cytokines in the aqueous of the eye and thickness of the macula after treatment of topical ketorolac for patients undergoing cataract surgery.
The objective of this retrospective chart review is to evaluate drug utilization, usage patterns and indication of effectiveness Eylea in the routine clinical (real-life) management of patients who suffer from ME (Macular Edema), secondary to CRVO (Central Retinal Vein Occlusion), and who started treatment with Eylea for this indication.
In this double clinical trial 132 patient with the history of DME (Diabetic Macular Edema) to receive intravitreous bevacizumab at a dose of 1.25mg (44 patient) , ziv-aflibercept at dose of 1.25 mg (44 patient) , ziv-aflibercept at dose of 2.5 mg (44 patient) . The study drugs were administered as often as every 4 weeks for 3 months.monitoring of best-corrected visual acuity, CST ( Central Subfield Thickness) by OCT (Optical coherence tomography) was done from base line ,4 weeks, 8weeks after injection.
Diabetic Macular Edema is a serious ocular consequence of poorly controlled diabetes. Even though significant research has been done to clarify the pathogenesis of DME, a clear causal pathway of the complication is of yet undetermined. However, there is some consensus among researchers that a cascade of inflammatory markers plays an important role in the disease process. The study hopes to better delineate the role these inflammatory markers play by investigating whether basal levels predict response or lack thereof to Aflibercept.
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of vitrectomy for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Diabetes is known to cause retinal blood vessels to leak, leading to swelling of the central retina (macula), and decreased vision. Removing the vitreous gel with vitrectomy surgery is known to decrease the swelling caused by diabetes. Diabetic retinopathy is often treated with laser or injections of medicine in to the eye.
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of vision loss in diabetic patients. While anti-VEGF treatments and to a lesser extent corticosteroid and macular photocoagulation have improved outcomes in patients with DME, no single therapy is universally effective and currently there is no a priori means of determine which patients will respond best to any given therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine whether specific parameters of ocular imaging studies including optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography can predict response to treatment in patients with DME. This is a prospective observational cohort study that will collect clinical data and imaging studies obtained as standard of care. Up to 150 subjects with clinically significant DME will be enrolled at Duke Eye Center or its satellite offices. These imaging studies will be analyzed to determine whether specific parameters are associated with poor or favorable response to specific treatments. There will be no intervention as part of this observational trial, thus the primary risk to subjects is loss of confidentiality, which will be minimized by the study team.
Multiple studies have implicated vascular endothelial growth factor VEGF as a major causative factor in human eye diseases characterized by neovascularization including proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and vascular permeability including diabetic macular edema (DME). While there is strong evidence that PDR outcomes are markedly reduced in eyes that are treated with monthly anti-VEGF therapy (A Study of Ranibizumab Injection in Subjects With Clinically Significant Macular Edema (ME) With Center Involvement Secondary to Diabetes Mellitus: RIDE/RISE) and moderately reduced in eyes that received fairly frequent dosing during the 1st year of treatment (Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network protocol I), it is unknown whether or not an earlier but less frequent dosing regimen would result in similar, favorable anatomic outcomes, and whether favorable anatomic outcomes subsequently would result in favorable visual acuity outcomes. If this study demonstrates that intravitreous aflibercept treatment is effective and safe for reducing the onset of PDR or center involved- DME (CI-DME) in eyes that are at high risk for these complications, a new strategy to prevent vision threatening complications of diabetes will be available for patients. The application of intravitreous aflibercept earlier in the course of disease (i.e., at the time when an eye has baseline severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy) could help to reduce future potential treatment burden in patients, at the same time resulting in similar or better long-term visual outcomes, if PDR and DME are prevented. The primary objectives of this protocol are to 1) determine the efficacy and safety of intravitreous aflibercept injections versus sham injections (observation) for prevention of PDR or CI-DME in eyes at high risk for development of these complications and 2) compare long-term visual outcomes in eyes that receive anti-VEGF therapy early in the course of disease with those that are observed initially, and treated only if high-risk PDR or CI-DME with vision loss develops. Secondary objectives include: - Comparing other visual acuity outcomes between treatment groups, such as proportion of eyes with at least 10 or at least 15 letter loss from baseline, or gain or loss of at least 5 letters at the consecutive study visit just before and at the 2- or 4-year visit - Comparing optical coherence tomography (OCT) outcomes, such as mean change in OCT central subfield thickness and volume from baseline - Comparing proportion of eyes with at least 2 and 3-step worsening or improvement of diabetic retinopathy severity level (scale for individual eyes) by central reading center from baseline - Comparing associated treatment and follow-up exam costs between treatment groups - Comparing safety outcomes between treatment groups
A 12-month, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Treat and Extend Regimen (TER) of Aflibercept (EYLEA) 2mg /0.05 ml as a Second Line Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema - TADI Study
Retrospective cases series is a non-randomized, open-label, single-center investigation (Retina Clinic, São Paulo, Brazil) of patients diagnosed with macular edema secondary to diabetic retinopathy (DME) and retinal vein occlusions who underwent to simultaneous treatment with intravitreal injection of bevacizumab 1.25mg and implant of dexamethasone 0.7mg.
The Macular Edema Ranibizumab v. Intravitreal anti-inflammatory Therapy (MERIT) Trial will compare the relative efficacy and safety of intravitreal methotrexate, intravitreal ranibizumab, and the intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of uveitic macular edema persisting or reoccurring after an intravitreal corticosteroid injection. MERIT is a parallel design (1:1:1), randomized comparative trial with an anniversary close-out after 6 months of follow-up. The primary outcome is percent change in central subfield thickness from the baseline OCT measurement to the 12 week visit.