View clinical trials related to Lung Injury.
Filter by:The purpose of this single-centered, proof of concept study is to determine whether it is feasible to perform a phrenic nerve block to reduce diaphragm electrical activity and, therefore, inspiratory effort and if such block reduces self-inflicted lung injury on patients under mechanical ventilation on spontaneous breathing. Ten patients will be monitored with electrical impedance tomography, NAVA catheter, and esophageal balloon. Using a nerve stimulator and an ultrasound, we will identify the phrenic nerve on its cervical portion bilaterally and administer perineural low-dose lidocaine. Diaphragm electrical activity, transpulmonary pressure and data on ventilation distribution will be continuously collected. The study will be over once the patient presents the same diaphragm electrical activity and transpulmonary pressure as before the phrenic nerve block.
In 1967, the term "respirator lung" was coined to describe the diffuse alveolar infiltrates and hyaline membranes that were found on postmortem examination of patients who had undergone mechanical ventilation.This mechanical ventilation can aggravate damaged lungs and damage normal lungs. In recent years, Various ventilation strategies have been used to minimize lung injury, including low tide volume, higher PEEPs, recruitment maneuvers and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. which have been proved to reduce the occurrence of lung injury. In 2012,Needham et al. proposed a kind of lung protective mechanical ventilation, and their study showed that limited volume and pressure ventilation could significantly improve the 2-year survival rate of patients with acute lung injury.Volume controlled ventilation is the most commonly used method in clinical surgery at present.Volume controlled ventilation(VCV) is a time-cycled, volume targeted ventilation mode, ensures adequate gas exchange. Nevertheless, during VCV, airway pressure is not controlled.Pressure controlled ventilation（PCV） can ensure airway pressure,however minute ventilation is not guaranteed.Pressure controlled ventilation-volume guarantee(PCV-VG) is an innovative mode of ventilation utilizes a decelerating flow and constant pressure. Ventilator parameters are automatically changed with each patient breath to offer the target VT without increasing airway pressures. So PCV-VG has the advantages of both VCV and PCV to preserve the target minute ventilation whilst producing a low incidence of barotrauma pressure-targeted ventilation. Current studies on PCV-VG mainly focus on thoracic surgery, bariatric surgery and urological surgery, and the research indicators mainly focus on changes in airway pressure and intraoperative oxygenation index.The age of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection is generally higher, the cardiopulmonary reserve function is decreased, and the influence of intraoperative pneumoperitoneum pressure and low head position increases the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative pulmonary complications.Whether PCV-VG can reduce the incidence of intraoperative lung injury and postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection, and thereby improve postoperative recovery of these patients is still unclear.
This is a research study to determine if identifying an optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) targeted specifically to individualized patient characteristics will shorten the time on the ventilator. Participants will have catheter placed through the nose into the esophagus to measure the pressure inside the chest. This catheter will remain until the patient is freed from the ventilator. Participants will be randomized to usual care or to have the level of PEEP determined by the esophageal balloon pressure readings. The total time spent on the ventilator will be recorded.
As an important life sustaining support , mechanical ventilation has greatly promoted the development of modern intensive care units. However, mechanical ventilation can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury, including barotrauma, volutrauma, atelectrauma and biotrauma. All patients undergoing mechanical ventilation are at risk of barotrauma. A multicenter prospective cohort study of 5183 patients with mechanical ventilation showed that the incidence of pulmonary barotrauma was 3%. The incidence of pulmonary barotrauma varied according to the causes of mechanical ventilation: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3%), asthma (6%), chronic interstitial lung disease (10%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (7%) and pneumonia (4%). At present, it is considered that one of the main causes of barotrauma is the increasing of transpulmonary pressure. Transpulmonary pressure is the difference between alveolar pressure and intrapleural pressure. The commonly adopted lung protective ventilation methods include: limiting plateau pressure less than or equal to 30 cmH2O, using small tidal volume ventilation (6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight) . All the above methods are to reduce trans-pulmonary pressure by reducing alveolar pressure. In addition to reducing alveolar pressure, increasing pleural pressure is another important way to reduce transpulmonary pressure and the incidence of barotrauma. At present, the main method is the use of neuromuscular blockade. However, there are many shortcomings in of neuromuscular blockade: 1. Time limit, generally not more than 48 hours; 2. Long-term use of neuromuscular blockade causes adverse reactions such as myopathy; 3. Neuromuscular blockade are only suitable for invasive mechanical ventilation patients, but not for non-invasive mechanical ventilation or high flow oxygen inhalation patients. Therefore, it is urgent to find other methods to reduce trans-pulmonary pressure and lung injury. The investigators drew inspiration from the early mechanism of "iron lung" ventilator and the clinical practice of reducing trans-pulmonary pressure and lung injury in obese patients. In the early stage, the investigators carried out the clinical practice of extrapulmonary lung protection strategy, that is, to give thoracic band restraint to patients undergoing non-invasive mechanical ventilation so as to reduce chest wall compliance, which can be significantly reduced under the same inspiratory pressure and occurrence of barotrauma. However, the respiratory mechanics mechanism of this method still needs to be further studied to determine whether it can reduce the incidence of barotrauma by reducing transpulmonary pressure. It is accessible and inexpensive. The aim of this study was to determine the changes of transpulmonary pressure in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation before and after thoracic band fixation by esophageal manometry without spontaneous breathing.
Patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit often are affected by acute respiratory failure at admission or during hospital stay, with a mortality of 30%. Treatment remains largely supportive with mechanical ventilation as the mainstay of management by improving the hypoxemia and reducing the work of breathing; however, the mechanical forces generated during ventilation can further enhance pulmonary inflammation and edema, a process that has been termed ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). Consequently, in clinical practice the lung protective ventilation is mainly based on the reduction of the tidal volume, the airway and the transpulmonary plateau pressure. A good clinical practice is based on the assessment of changes in respiratory mechanics. Aim of the study is to determine the accuracy of the OPTIVENT system in measuring transpulmonary pressure, comparing it with the systems currently in use in our Operative Unit.
Whilst deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is common following traumatic brain injury (TBI), optimal timing and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis is uncertain. Paradoxically the harm associated with the occurrence of is also unclear. This study is an observational pilot that aims to define the incidence of proximal DVT in patients with moderate to severe TBI. It seeks prospectively to determine if there is an association between DVT and outcome. It also seeks to explore possible associations between the occurrence of DVT and the incidence of lung injury and/or ventilator associated pneumonia.
The investigators will define two separate groups of surgical procedures: 1.) an 'open group' in which mainly open anatomic lung resections will be included, and 2.) a 'minimally invasive' group in which mainly thoracoscopic anatomic lung resections will be included. Both groups will then be randomized to either the performance of the surgical procedure under 'standard conditions' or to the performance of the procedure with the additional use of a smoke evacuation system. During every procedure the hazardous smoke that is generated by the electrocautery in the surgical field will be collected through a tube at the height of the surgeons face. The smoke is then directly transferred to a mass spectrometer that is situated in the operating room (OR) and performs a real-time analysis of the chemical substances in the air. The degree of air pollution will be measured as well as the smoke evacuation systems' ability to reduce these hazardous chemical substances in the air can be evaluated.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the intravenous (IV) or paravertebral (PV) lidocaine administration during the intraoperative period of lung resection surgery on the appearance of postoperative complications. We design a randomized, controlled and blinded study to be performed in 153 patients with 3 arms: 1) Lidocaine IV + PV saline 2) saline IV + PV lidocaine, 3) remifentanil IV + PV saline. Perioperative analysis of inflammatory biomarkers in bronchoalveolar lavage and serum. Follow-up of the postoperative course, especially the appearance of postoperative complications according to the revised Clavien-Dindo classification for thoracic surgery, as well as other relevant clinical results.
Using Pirfenidone to treat Grade 2 or Grade3 radiation-induced lung injury, and observe the efficacy and safety of the drug.
The histologic hallmarks of lung inflammation and in the extreme, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), include intense accumulation of inflammatory cells in the airspaces and interstitium, injury to alveolar epithelial and endothelial cells, loss of epithelial-capillary integrity and accumulation of edema fluid in the interstitium and airspaces. Accordingly, for alveolar repair to occur inflammation must be halted, debris and inflammatory cells removed, injured tissue cells replaced, and capillary barrier function re-established. Macrophages are key players in all of these. Here the investigators hypothesize that resident alveolar macrophages and recruited macrophages serve completely different functions, acting independently (i.e. division of labor) yet cooperatively (synergism).