View clinical trials related to Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.
Filter by:The primary aim of this study is to learn whether the frequency of lower urinary tract symptoms differ between the males with seronegativity for HIV and males living with HIV.
From previous studies, the investigators found that sexual outcomes after prostate surgery may show insignificant improvement, remain unchanged or deteriorate in non-negligible number of patients especially those with high preoperative IIEF scores. Deterioration of erectile function could be attributed to persistence of storage symptoms specially nocturia. Several pathophysiologic mechanisms, described before, are involved in pathogenesis of LUTS and ED and one can imagine that after relief of obstruction, the erectile function should improve, however lack of improvement or even deterioration suggests that damage associated with these mechanisms is irreversible and patients may require some sort of penile rehabilitation after surgery. The investigators hypothesized that Tadalafil may enhance relief of storage symptoms and enhance recovery of erectile function after surgery for BPH. With this assumption, a RCT was designed to examine the utility and efficacy of Tadalafil, once daily dose, to relieve persistent/ de novo storage symptoms and early erectile function deterioration after endoscopic prostate surgery.
The goal of this study is to learn about the patient's perspective regarding to psychological mood before and after an invasive urodynamic study.
The goal of this study is to learn whether the change or patient position might effect the results of invasive urodynamic study in males.
The goal of this clinical study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of the Neuflo System for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The main questions it aims to answer are: - Can treatment with the Neuflo System lead to at least a 30% improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to BPH, as measured by the international prostate symptom score (IPSS) at 3 months after treatment which is sustained for 12 months? - Is treatment with the Neuflo System tolerable to the patient, as measured by visual analog score (VAS) for pain before and after treatment and procedural medication requirements? - Is treatment with the Neuflo System safe, as measured by the incidence and severity of device or procedural related serious adverse events. Participants will be enrolled in the study over a 6 month period. Each participant will be treated with the Neuflo System and assessed at 3 and 12 months following treatment. A subgroup of patients will have an MRI at 1 week to assess the volume and location of ablated tissue. The duration of the study is expected to be 18 months.
A urodynamic study (UDS) is a common procedure done to learn more about the cause of urinary symptoms. For some patients, UDS can be associated with anxiety or discomfort. Nitrous oxide (or laughing-gas) is a well-known sedative which is frequently used in dental offices and for pediatric procedures to reduce anxiety and pain. This study is being done to see if giving low-dose (25-50%) nitrous oxide at the time of UDS affects the measurements taken during the procedure, such as how much volume your bladder can hold, and pressures during urination. If the measurements are the same with and without self-administered nitrous oxide (SANO), it could be suggested that nitrous oxide may be a useful way of reducing patient anxiety and pain during UDS.
Women with type 2 diabetes (n=150) experiencing ≥1 storage lower urinary tract symptoms and poor sleep health will be recruited from the outpatient departments or wards/units of the selected hospitals/clinics. Our study aims to examine the effects of conservative management incorporating urologic health promotion and sleep health promotion on relieving storage lower urinary tract symptoms and poor sleep, and on improving urologic health self-management behaviors and health-related quality of life. Women who agree to participate will be randomly assigned into the intervention group A, intervention group B, or comparison group. The intervention group A receives a 4-month conservative management with sleep hygiene related adjustments, pelvic floor muscle training, and urologic health promotion. The intervention group B receives a 4-month conservative management with brief behavioral treatment for insomnia (BBTI), pelvic floor muscle training, and urologic health promotion. The comparison group receives information related to pelvic floor muscle training and urologic health promotion, and receives a brief conservative management related to sleep hygiene adjustments after the completion of data collection. Information related to intervention effects is obtained by a questionnaire, a wristwatch-like actigraphy, and physical activity/diet/voiding/sleep logs from all participants at 4 data collection points: baseline, and 2-, 4-, 6-month follow-ups. Our study hypothesis is that the intervention effects on relieving storage lower urinary tract symptoms and poor sleep, and on improving urologic health self-management behaviors and health-related quality of life in the intervention group A or B are superior to the changes revealed in the comparison group.
The goal of this single-centre prospective randomized clinical trial is to compare the post-operative use of temporary prostatic stent (Group 1) vs indwelling catheter (Group 2) in patients undergoing cryotherapy for targeted therapy of localized prostate cancer, transurethral water vapor energy ablation (REZUM) or transperineal laser ablation of the prostate with EchoLaserâ„¢ system for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) The main questions are: - Difference in quality of life, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (scored with IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score), urinary continence symptoms (scored with International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form, ICIQ-UI-SF) and patient satisfaction between indwelling catheter and temporary prostatic stent (Exime®) score with a non-validated questionnaire (Stent/catheter-related urinary symptoms questionnaire) - Difference in side effects and complications between indwelling catheter and temporary prostatic stent (Exime®) A total 120 of patients will be enrolled (Group 1: 60; Group 2: 60) with a 1:1 randomization ratio. The follow-up duration will be 6 months.
With this prospective, observational study, we would like to investigate the effect of instillation therapy using BCG or mitomycin C on short- and long-term irritative and obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms using validated questionnaires. The study will objectify the lower urinary tract symptoms and thereby provide better recommendations for therapy with mitomycin C or BCG.
Rationale: A variety of surgical techniques have been described for surgical treatment of male LUTS because of BPH, which has different outcomes and may result in adverse events regarding ejaculatory function and erection, resulting in a negative impact on QOL on short- and mid-term follow-ups. Objective: To compare outcomes of BPH surgery using a conventional versus ejaculation preserving technique on QOL-related aspects with emphasis on ejaculatory and erectile function. Study design: This study is a prospective longitudinal multi-center trial to compare the ejaculatory and erectile function outcomes between conventional and ejaculation preserving BPH surgical procedures/techniques. Baseline characteristics will be recorded, as well as short and mid-term follow-up. Study population: The study population comprises patients who will undergo BPH surgery in the participating centers. Intervention: All patients will undergo BPH surgery (including but not restricted to Monopolar / Bipolar Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), photo vaporisation (PVP), Plasmakinetic (PK), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) or open prostatectomy (OP)). Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint is to compare the baseline to the short-term (3 months) and mid-term (6 months) ejaculation function and QoL outcomes. The secondary endpoint is the short and mid-term erection function and QoL outcomes compared to baseline. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit, and group relatedness: Patients' burden and risk associated with participating in this trial do not differ among surgical procedures or techniques used. In all groups, patients will undergo a BPH surgery and will be followed for six months at 3 visits.