View clinical trials related to Liver Cirrhosis.
Filter by:This is an European, prospective, interventional, and multicenter exploratory clinical investigation that will take place in 6 French sites and 200 patients will be included (adults and children). The study objective is to develop predictive indicators of homogeneous propagation of ultrasound and elastic waves to define an optimal region of interest for the measurement of liver stiffness during VCTE examination.
This study is a prospective study. We signed an informed consent form with patients with liver fibrosis and took tauroursodeoxycholic acid orally for half a year. After half a year, liver biopsy was performed using histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting method was used to determine the expression level of fibrosis-related markers to verify the effect of taurodeoxycholic acid on patients with liver fibrosis.
Portal hypertension is a common complication of chronic liver disease and is associated with most clinical consequences of cirrhosis. The most reliable method for assessing portal hypertension is the measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). The HVPG is the gold-standard methods for assessing clinically significant portal hypertension and becoming increasingly used clinically. It is useful in the differential diagnosis of portal hypertension and provides a prognostic index in cirrhotic patients. Many patients are painful and reluctant to undergo serial HVPG measurements. But interventionists are reluctant to use analgesics because they always pay more attention to the accuracy of HVPG measurements.Although Adam F. et al concluded that low-dose midazolam sedation is an option for patients undergoing serial hepatic venous pressure measurements (Hepatology 1999), the effects of using opioid analgesics alone on hepatic venous pressure measurements have not yet been defined. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of fentanyl on the HVPG.
timely short-term antibiotic prophylaxis is an essential step in the management of these patients . Prophylaxis must be instituted as early as variceal hemorrhage is suspected, and timely administration has been associated with a reduced re-bleeding rate and lower mortality . More recently, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) recommended antibiotic prophylaxis in all cirrhotic patients with UGIB, regardless of its source (i.e. variceal or non-variceal) or the presence of ascites.
This phase III clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) injected hepatic artery.
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of OP-724 in liver cirrhosis patients caused by HIV/HCV co-infection with hemophilia.
Liver cirrhosis is a frequent and severe chronic disease. About 20 % of patients with liver cirrhosis develop umbilical hernias. In comparison, the prevalence in the general population is around 2 %. Patients with liver cirrhosis are often neglected and are not offered equal surgical treatments compared with other patient groups with chronic diseases due to fear of postoperative complications. The current literature is sparse, and many questions remain to be answered, such as timing of repair, risk profile, preoperative staging of the liver disease, possible optimization before surgery, repair technique, and postoperative care. Moreover, nationwide data are lacking. The management of umbilical hernias in patients with cirrhosis is debated. Recently, European Hernia Society published guidelines stating that elective hernia repair may be safe, and that emergency repair is associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Nonetheless, surgeons remain reluctant to perform elective surgery on these patients due to fear of complications and mortality. The evidence supporting the guidelines is sparse and consists of small, low quality studies. One of the major concerns is that the existing studies failed to use clear and well-described definitions of the underlying severity of the liver disease. The rate of emergency repair may be much higher in patients with liver cirrhosis compared with the general population but there is no data available. The rate of emergency vs elective repair in patients with liver cirrhosis in Denmark is unknown, as well as the rate of reoperation for complications and readmission. Finally, we hypothesize that these patients may benefit from a more proactive approach with early diagnosis of their umbilical hernia by screening, preoperative optimization, and early elective hernia repair, but the effect of this hypothesis needs further evaluation.
There is a high prevalence of hepatic cirrhosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC), or chemotherapy-induced hepatic atrophy or hepatosteatosis in patients with liver metastases associated with high risk of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). MRI-SPION radiotherapy planning will facilitate detection and maximize avoidance of residual functionally active hepatic parenchyma from over-the-threshold irradiation thus increasing safety of liver SBRT in patients with pre-existing liver conditions. The investigators have previously demonstrated that liver SBRT with SPECT/CT functional treatment planning utilizing 99mTc sulfur colloid in transplant eligible patients associated with minimal hepatotoxicity and without hastening of advanced hepatic cirrhosis progression while patients await liver transplant. Switching from nuclear medicine to an MR-Linac-SPION based quantitative treatment-planning platform will substantially improve diagnostic accuracy in defining safe volumes of residual functional hepatic parenchyma for liver SBRT planning on MR-Linac.
The main purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of various non-invasive elastography techniques at determining liver stiffness measures in human subjects. Specifically, the investigators are comparing MRE and FibroScan to Vibroelastography (VE, Liver Incytes System). These techniques are used to measure stiffness in the liver.
NAFLD, closely linked to overweight and insulin resistance, has reached 25% prevalence worldwide. Advanced liver fibrosis(ALF) must be accurately diagnosed in NAFLD because it defines a subgroup of patients with impaired prognosis, and these patients need a specific management to prevent the occurrence of liver-related complication. Relatively few NAFLD patients develop ALF and it is a challenge for physicians to identify them. Liver biopsy is the reference for liver fibrosis evaluation but this invasive procedure cannot be first-line used in NAFLD. Non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis is now available, especially liver stiffness measurement (LSM) with Fibroscan and blood fibrosis tests. However, Fibroscan is a costly device available only in few specialized centres with thus poor accessibility in face of the large NAFLD population. Blood fibrosis tests can be performed by every physician and are distinguished as "complex" or "simple". Because they include specialized biomarkers, complex blood fibrosis tests are accurate for the diagnosis of ALF but they are quite expensive and not reimbursed, with therefore limited use in clinical practice. Simple blood fibrosis tests have the advantage to include cheap and easy-to-obtain biomarkers with simple calculation thanks to free websites or smartphone applications. Simple blood fibrosis tests are globally less accurate than complex blood fibrosis tests or Fibroscan but, used with a high-sensitivity cut-off, they have the high interest of being able to accurately rule out advanced fibrosis in a significant proportion of NAFLD patients. Recently, two sequential diagnostic procedures have been developed for the diagnosis of ALF with the idea to combine the advantages of the different kind of fibrosis tests: the FIB4-Fibroscan (FIB4-FS) and the eLIFT-FibroMeterVCTE (eLIFT-FMVCTE) algorithms. These algorithms include as first-line procedure a simple blood fibrosis test (FIB4 or eLIFT) which identifies the patients who require a further second-line evaluation with a more accurate non-invasive test (Fibroscan or FibroMeterVCTE). Liver biopsy is finally used as third-line procedure in patients for whom the diagnosis remains undetermined. Such algorithms have the advantage to limit the use of complex fibrosis tests only to a subset of at risk-patients. The TRAFIC study compare two strategies for the diagnosis of ALF in NAFLD patients: the FIB4-Fibroscan algorithm and the eLIFT-FibroMeterVCTE algorithm