View clinical trials related to Liver Cirrhosis.
Filter by:Aim: To test if MRI can detect meaningful changes in portal pressure in the liver to assess whether treatment with beta-blockers has worked. Liver Disease: Most people with liver disease do not have symptoms. Over time they develop 'cirrhosis' - severe liver scarring. In the United Kingdom deaths due to cirrhosis have doubled over the last decade, because of increasing rates of alcohol consumption and obesity, while heart, kidney, lung diseases, strokes and cancer fatalities have fallen. Portal pressure: Cirrhosis causes increased pressure within the liver and changes in the circulation leading to the development of varicose veins in the gullet and stomach called 'varices'. Varices bleed easily, leading to emergency situations that can be life threatening. However, if the increased pressure within the liver (portal pressure) is detected early, then treatment can prevent variceal bleeding. The only test we have to predict prognosis and treatment success in someone with cirrhosis is by measuring the portal pressure. Measuring portal pressure: Currently the only existing test to measure portal pressure is to pass a pressure sensor through a vein in the neck, down into the liver. This is called the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. The HVPG measurement is disliked by patients because it is an invasive procedure. It is also expensive and not widely available. Hence, patients with cirrhosis need to have regular camera tests (endoscopies) to look for varices. How can you treat varices? Two options; 1. With tablets to lower the pressure (beta-blockers) 2. Endoscopy treatment (banding) Both have advantages and disadvantages; - Beta-blockers only lower the portal pressure in about half of those that take them, with some evidence they may also have a protective effect against infections from the bowel by increasing the speed of bowel motion - Treating the varices with endoscopy requires several endoscopies and can lead to life-threatening bleeding. Most patients are therefore given beta-blockers and monitored closely to see if they work. Why does it matter? Beta-blockers can cause side effects (e.g. fainting) that are unpleasant enough to make up to one third of patients stop taking them. Beta-blockers only reduce the portal pressure in half of patients. The remaining patients are exposed to potential side effects and possible harm in those with the most advanced liver disease. These patients may still have a life-threatening bleed as the varices have not been adequately treated. There is a desperate need to discover whether the portal pressure changes with treatment (such as with beta-blockers) without invasive tests across the NHS. Proposed study: Researchers in Nottingham have shown MRI can be used as an accurate marker of portal pressure with just one scan. To be useful to patients, doctors and researchers, this study will investigate whether MRI can detect meaningful changes in portal pressure after treatment with beta-blockers. This study has been designed with patient and public involvement (PPI) integrated throughout. A focus group shaped the study design and committed to collaborate in developing patient materials, recruitment, retention and dissemination. All patients who have HVPG will be given information about the study. Study Visit 1 - One hour MRI scan - Endoscopy to identify varices - If varices are present the patient will be started on beta-blockers and invited to visit 2 - If there are no varices, patients will return to regular follow up with the liver team Study Visit 2 (after one week) - Assess side effects, blood pressure and pulse - Increase dose of beta-blocker as appropriate Study Visit 3 (after 4-12 weeks) - One hour MRI scan - Repeat HVPG measurement Treatment success is determined by the second HVPG measurement. If beta-blockers are working they will be continued. If not, the patient will have treatment with endoscopy. This represents the ideal pathway which is more personalised than current standard care.
This proposal translates a hypothesis driven basic research into clinical setting to determine the potential of using autologous CD133+ cells to reverse fibrosis and improve clinical outcome for patients with end stage cirrhosis. This has significant impact on the management of cirrhosis.
This is a single-center and prospective study to identify specific biomarker in order to predict development of decompensation in cirrhotic patients. The duration of the study is 36 months and it provides a cohort of 200 patients.
Purpose of the study is to determine transcriptomics, metabolomics and proteomics features of liver cirrhotic tissue in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to find a correlation with the risk of developing HCC and survival.
Protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) occurs in 65-90% of patients with liver cirrhosis. Severity of malnutrition correlates with progression of liver disease and leads to sarcopenia in 30-70% of cirrhotic patients. Malnutrition and sarcopenia are associated with an increased risk of complications and mortality. In cirrhosis the gut microbiome is altered leading to increased gut permeability, bacterial translocation and inflammation. Since the microbiome is involved in nutrient uptake and metabolism, it is hypothesized that microbiome alterations contribute to sarcopenia. A prospective controlled cohort study to investigate the interrelation of microbiome changes and sarcopenia in cirrhosis will be conducted. Furthermore the effect of nutritional interventions on the microbiome in cirrhosis will be studied. From this study information on how the gut microbiome composition and sarcopenia are associated in cirrhosis and if modulation of the gut microbiome by nutritional interventions is feasible will be collected.
Primary Objective: To evaluate the long-term outcomes including liver related morbidity, mortality and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development as compared to those of historical control with interferon(IFN)-based treatment. Secondary Objective: 1. To access liver fibrosis progression/regression in CHC patients after sofosbuvir-based treatment. 2. To investigate the long-term outcomes of extrahepatic manifestations of the sofosbuvir-based treated cohort as compared to their pretreatment status.
Imbalance of gut bacteria is suspected to play a key role driving the progression of cirrhosis and there is hope manipulation of these bacteria may be beneficial. This study will determine if fecal microbiota transplantation is an effective and safe treatment for decompensated cirrhosis.
Recent studies demonstrated that liver cirrhosis was associated with a hypercoagulability state. Besides, bacterial translocation plays an important role in the pathogenesis and complications in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, including infections as well as hepatic encephalopathy and hepatorenal syndrome. A recent prospective study in a group of 70 patients with liver cirrhosis (Child B and C stages up to 10 points) who were randomized to receive enoxaparin for a year (n = 34) vs no intervention (n = 36) showed that anticoagulant treatment with enoxaparin is safe and effective, significantly reducing risk of PVT development and liver decompensation, markedly improving overall survival. This study provides exciting preliminary data regarding the potential use of prophylactic anticoagulation in improving clinical outcomes in cirrhosis, beyond the prevention of portal vein thrombosis. This study suggested that the effect was partly due to a direct effect of reducing BT and levels of proinflammatory cytokines. However, this study included few patients, was not double blind, and did not have a placebo group. Therefore, despite the spectacular results, the use of prophylactic anticoagulant therapy has not become routine practice in patients with cirrhosis and more studies are needed to assess the potential usefulness of anticoagulation in improving the prognosis of liver cirrhosis. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are now routinely used to treat the complications of portal hypertension, such as variceal bleeding and refractory ascites. TIPS is the most effective method to prevent rebleeding, however, it is burdened with increased risk of hepatic encephalopathy and deterioration of liver function in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Notably, TIPS can not only relieve portal pressure but also can redirect the portal blood flow through the shunt directly into the systemic circulation which can cause systemic hemodynamic changes. Given the preliminary data suggesting a beneficial effect of prophylactic anticoagulation with LMWH in cirrhotic patients, this multicenter randomized controlled study attempts to demonstrate the effect of long term LMWH therapy after TIPS on survival in cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.
The primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), formerly known as primary biliary cirrhosis, treatment is based in the use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) at a daily dose of 13 to 15 mg/kg, without other treatment options. Patients with good or complete response to UDCA have more liver transplant-free survival and delay histologic progression compared to patients with partial or no response. Nowadays there is an estimated partial response to UDCA in approximately 30 to 50% of patients with PBC. There is a need for new second line management strategies for patients without a biochemical response to UDCA. The addition of bezafibrate to the treatment of PBC patients with partial biochemical response to UDCA, will increase the biochemical response and improve the long term prognosis? And if so, which are the efficacy and security of bezafibrate in PBC patients without biochemical response?
Biochemical response of primary biliary cholangitis-autoimmune hepatitis overlap syndrome induced by ursodeoxycholic acid only or combination therapy of immunosuppressive agents