Clinical Trials Logo

Leukemia, Lymphoid clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Leukemia, Lymphoid.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT00973752 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Treatment of Older Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Start date: August 2009
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of a multi-drug regimen (which includes prednisone, vincristine, cytarabine, doxorubicin, 6 mercaptopurine, and methotrexate) which is considered standard treatment for children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), in combination with PEG-asparaginase and clofarabine to treat older adults with ALL. PEG-asparaginase has been used in chemotherapy treatment regimens for both children and adults with ALL. Clofarabine has been used in chemotherapy treatment regimens for children with ALL and has been shown to decrease the number of leukemia cells. Participants with leukemia that has an abnormal chromosome, called the Philadelphia chromosome, will also be given imatinib.

NCT ID: NCT00968253 Completed - Leukemia Clinical Trials

RAD001 Study in Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia

Start date: November 2009
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The goal of Phase I of this clinical research study is to find the highest tolerable dose of RAD001 (everolimus) when given in combination with the standard chemotherapy regimens to patients with ALL. The goal of Phase II of this study is to learn if the drug combinations can help to control ALL. The safety of these drug combinations will be also studied in both phases.

NCT ID: NCT00967057 Completed - Leukemia Clinical Trials

Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Young Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Start date: October 2002
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating young patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PURPOSE: This partially randomized phase III trial is studying how well combination chemotherapy works in treating young patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

NCT ID: NCT00964873 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

A Phase 1 Study of the HSP90 Inhibitor, STA-9090 in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Blast-phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

Start date: August 2009
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

An open-label phase 1 study to assess safety and efficacy of once-weekly STA-9090 (ganetespib) in subjects with AML, ALL and blast-phase CML.

NCT ID: NCT00963274 Completed - Lymphoma Clinical Trials

Bortezomib and Romidepsin in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Start date: April 26, 2010
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of giving bortezomib and romidepsin together in treating patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), indolent B-cell lymphoma, peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Bortezomib and romidepsin may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.

NCT ID: NCT00963105 Completed - Clinical trials for Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Study of Lenalidomide to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Start date: October 19, 2009
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of different dose regimens of lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

NCT ID: NCT00954720 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Observational Study of Iron Overload in Stem Cell Transplantation

Start date: March 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Recent retrospective studies have suggested that iron overload is a clinically important problem in patients undergoing ablative stem cell transplantation. However, these studies relied on serum ferritin as a surrogate of iron overload, which limits the conclusions that can be drawn from such analyses. Therefore, the investigators are conducting a prospective study to more rigorously examine the prevalence, mechanisms, and consequences of iron overload in this patient population.

NCT ID: NCT00951457 Completed - Clinical trials for Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell

Bendamustine Combined With Alemtuzumab in Pretreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Start date: March 2009
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of this study is to determine the percentage of patients achieving a response, defined as the percentage of patients achieving complete response, partial response and stable disease/ no change upon treatment with the combination therapy according to NCI response criteria (also established according to IWCLL guidelines) upon treatment with a combination of bendamustine and alemtuzumab.

NCT ID: NCT00945828 Completed - Lymphoma Clinical Trials

Assessing the Effectiveness of Individual Education Plans for Childhood Cancer Survivors

Start date: January 2003
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children treated for cancer involving the central nervous system (CNS) provide educators with new challenges with regards to classification, monitoring, and intervention in the regular or special education classroom setting. Recommendations resulting from serial neurodevelopmental evaluations for these children often do not overlap with traditional special education recommendations commonly included in Individual Education Plans (IEPs) for children with congenital or genetic learning problems. The investigators currently do not know whether or not school-based treatment for learning problems, based on the child's IEP, incorporates recommendations made based on a neurodevelopmental evaluation appropriately. In addition, it is not clear whether or not the recommendations that are included in a child's IEP have any beneficial outcome on the child's learning and academic achievement over time. The purpose of this project is to examine the relationship between neurodevelopmental outcomes, recommendations for intervention, special education services and accommodations included in a child's school IEP, and outcome for the child following implementation of the IEP. The study has two major specific aims: 1. To quantify the clinical and educational contributions of recommendations resulting from neurodevelopmental evaluations and the subsequent development of IEPs. Hypothesis 1.1: Higher concordance between recommendations made based on neurodevelopmental evaluations and criteria written into children's IEPs will be associated with more positive academic outcomes (i.e. maintenance or improvement in academic skills). Hypothesis 1.2: Children who have higher concordance between criteria written into their IEPs and academic services actually received will show more positive academic outcomes than children whose IEP criteria and academic services are less concordant. 2. To evaluate an intervention that will improve academic outcomes for children treated for cancer. Hypothesis 2.1: Children whose IEPs are monitored more frequently will show more positive academic outcomes than their peers whose IEPs are monitored less frequently.

NCT ID: NCT00945815 Completed - Leukemia Clinical Trials

S0910 Epratuzumab, Cytarabine, and Clofarabine in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Start date: September 2010
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies, such as epratuzumab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some block the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Others find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cytarabine and clofarabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving epratuzumab together with cytarabine and clofarabine may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying the side effects and how well giving epratuzumab together with cytarabine and clofarabine works in treating patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.