Clinical Trials Logo

Left Bundle-Branch Block clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Left Bundle-Branch Block.

Filter by:
  • Active, not recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05572736 Active, not recruiting - Heart Failure Clinical Trials

Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Resynchronization in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

PhysioSync-HF
Start date: November 7, 2022
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing on death, worsening heart failure, and left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block.

NCT ID: NCT05251363 Active, not recruiting - Bradycardia Clinical Trials

BIOTRONIK Conduction System Pacing With the Solia Lead

BIO-CONDUCT
Start date: December 12, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of the BIO-CONDUCT study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the BIOTRONIK Solia S pacing lead when implanted in the left bundle branch (LBB) area. Safety will be assessed by evaluating serious adverse device effects that occur through 3 months post-implant. Efficacy will be assessed by evaluating implant success rate.

NCT ID: NCT05155865 Active, not recruiting - Heart Failure Clinical Trials

Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac resYNChronization

CSP-SYNC
Start date: January 10, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BiV) is the cornerstone treatment for heart failure patients with ventricular dyssynchrony. Recently, a new concept, conduction system pacing (CSP) with permanent pacing, including His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing, has been proposed as a potential alternative to conventional BiV-CRT. The prospective, randomized trial will compare echocardiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical effects of CSP versus conventional BiV pacing in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 35%), sinus rhythm, and left bundle branch block. Patients will be randomized to either CSP or biventricular pacing study group and followed up for at least 6 months. The study will explore whether CSP is non-inferior to BiV pacing in echocardiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical outcomes.

NCT ID: NCT02537782 Active, not recruiting - Heart Failure Clinical Trials

Myocardial Work and Metabolism in CRT

WORK-CRT
Start date: September 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Several attempts have been made to refine selection criteria for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Previously proposed parameters probably do not sufficiently reflect the underlying mechanical dyssynchrony of the left ventricle (LV). Earlier work of our research group suggests that better candidate selection can rely on the direct observation or measurement of this LV mechanical dyssynchrony by means of non-invasive imaging. In this study apical rocking and other non-invasive measures of LV mechanical dyssynchrony will be applied to evaluate regional myocardial workload and metabolism, and determine their predictive value in CRT response.