Laparoscopy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Assessment of Transpulmonary Driving Pressure and Intra-abdominal Pressure Relationship at Different Levels of Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) During Laparoscopic Surgery
Verified date | December 2019 |
Source | Hospital Universitario La Fe |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Objective: The aim of this project is to evaluate how intra-abdominal pressure paired coupled
with different ventilatory positive end-expiratory pressure levels affects the transpulmonary
driving pressure during pneumoperiteneum insufflation for laparoscopic surgery.
Methodology: Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery will be included. The study will
investigate the relationship between intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and transpulmonary
driving pressure (TpDp) and the effect of titration of PEEP on their relationship.
At three different levels of intra-abdominal pressure, the respiratory driving pressure (RDp)
and TpDp in each subject will be measured in each subject. The same subject will undergo two
different ventilation strategies. Demographic data (height, weight, body mass index and sex),
ASA physical status (surgical risk classification of the American Society of Anesthesiology),
number of previous abdominal surgeries, number of previous pregnancies, and respiratory
comorbidities will be collected. Respiratory pressures and mechanics will be recorded at each
level of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during each ventilatory strategy. The variables
recorded will include: airway pressures (Plateau pressure Pplat, Peak pressure, Ppeak), the
final esophageal pressure of inspiration and expiration and pulmonary stress index. Mixed
linear regression will be used to evaluate the relationship between different PEEP levels,
IAP and TpDp by adjusting for known confounders and adding individuals as a random factor.
Likewise, an analysis using a mixed linear regression model with the pulmonary stress index
as a function of the intra-abdominal pressure, the ventilation regime, and a specific random
intercept term for each subject will be performed.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 30 |
Est. completion date | November 21, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | November 21, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) risk scale I to III - Age > 18 years - Previously signed informed consent - Undergoing laparoscopic surgery Exclusion Criteria: - ASA = IV - Pregnancy - Advanced liver, kidney or cardiopulmonary disease |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | Hospital Universitario La Fe | Valencia |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Hospital Universitario La Fe |
Spain,
Cinnella G, Grasso S, Spadaro S, Rauseo M, Mirabella L, Salatto P, De Capraris A, Nappi L, Greco P, Dambrosio M. Effects of recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory mechanics and transpulmonary pressure during laparoscopic surgery. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jan;118(1):114-22. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182746a10. — View Citation
Cortes-Puentes GA, Gard KE, Adams AB, Faltesek KA, Anderson CP, Dries DJ, Marini JJ. Value and limitations of transpulmonary pressure calculations during intra-abdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1870-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a3bea. — View Citation
D'Antini D, Rauseo M, Grasso S, Mirabella L, Camporota L, Cotoia A, Spadaro S, Fersini A, Petta R, Menga R, Sciusco A, Dambrosio M, Cinnella G. Physiological effects of the open lung approach during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: focus on driving pressure. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Feb;84(2):159-167. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12042-0. Epub 2017 Jul 5. — View Citation
Neto AS, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, Beiderlinden M, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Futier E, Gajic O, El-Tahan MR, Ghamdi AA, Günay E, Jaber S, Kokulu S, Kozian A, Licker M, Lin WQ, Maslow AD, Memtsoudis SG, Reis Miranda D, Moine P, Ng T, Paparella D, Ranieri VM, Scavonetto F, Schilling T, Selmo G, Severgnini P, Sprung J, Sundar S, Talmor D, Treschan T, Unzueta C, Weingarten TN, Wolthuis EK, Wrigge H, Amato MB, Costa EL, de Abreu MG, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ; PROVE Network Investigators. Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Apr;4(4):272-80. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)00057-6. Epub 2016 Mar 4. Review. Erratum in: Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Jun;4(6):e34. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Transpulmonary driving pressure (TpDp) difference between standard and matched PEEP ventilation | TpDp (assessed in centimeters of water, cmH20) as assessed by ventilatory pressure and pleural pressure (recorded by an esophageal probe) is recorded at every intra-abdominal pressure level during pneumoperitoneum insufflation. The primary outcome is the difference between a standard perioperative management (fixed PEEP + 15 mmHg pneumoperitoneum pressure) and matched PEEP to intra-abdominal pressure and 8mmHg intra-abdominal pressure | Pneumoperitoneum insufflation before surgery (up to 30 minutes) | |
Secondary | Transpulmonary driving pressure and intra-abdmominal pressure relationship (multivariate adaptive linear regression) | TpDp (in cmH20) is recorded at different levels of IAP and with two different PEEP settings (in cmH20; two levels are: fixed at each IAP level, standard group and matched at each IAP level, matched group). The relationship between TpDp and IAP (both treated as continuous variables) at each PEEP level is plotted and a multiadaptive linear regression is fitted. | Pneumoperitoneum insufflation before surgery (up to 30 minutes) | |
Secondary | Transpulmonary driving pressure and respiratory driving pressure (RDp) relationship (multivariate adaptive linear regression). | Respiratory driving pressure (transpulmonary driving pressure + pressure to move the chest wall, in cmH20, RpDp) and TpDp relationship at each IAP and PEEP level will be assessed. The relationship between TpDp and RpDp (both treated as continuous variables) at each PEEP level is plotted and a multiadaptive linear regression is fitted. | Pneumoperitoneum insufflation before surgery (up to 30 minutes) | |
Secondary | Respiratory system compliance (Crs) difference between standard and matched PEEP levels | Respiratory system compliance measures the system's ability to stretch. It has two components Lung and Chest Wall (measured in milliliter/centimeters of water, ml/cmH20) | Pneumoperitoneum insufflation before surgery (up to 30 minutes) | |
Secondary | Pulmonary compliance (Cp) difference | Respiratory system compliance measures the system's ability to stretch (ml/cmH20). It has two components Lung and Chest Wall (measured in milliliter/centimeters of water, ml/cmH20). By using an esophageal probe measurement the two can be partitioned and analyzed separately. | Pneumoperitoneum insufflation before surgery (up to 30 minutes) | |
Secondary | Chest wall compliance (CCw) difference | Respiratory system compliance measures the system's ability to stretch (ml/cmH20). It has two components Lung and Chest Wall (measured in milliliter/centimeters of water, ml/cmH20). By using an esophageal probe measurement the two can be partitioned and analyzed separately. | Pneumoperitoneum insufflation before surgery (up to 30 minutes) | |
Secondary | Pulmonary Stress index difference | Stress index is based on respiratory pressure curve analysis and assess whether the lungs are overdistended or collapsed | Pneumoperitoneum insufflation before surgery (up to 30 minutes) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04515485 -
A Volumetric Nomogram for Height, Weight, and Intra Abdominal Volume
|
||
Completed |
NCT01725477 -
Laparoscopic Tubal Patency Assessment
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01093079 -
Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy - Surgical and Oncological Outcomes
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01093430 -
Is the Anterior Superior Iliac Spine a Useful Landmark at Laparoscopy?
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00535990 -
Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Database for the Purpose of Research
|
||
Completed |
NCT01092013 -
Comparative Evaluation of Simulator Based and Traditional In-surgery Laparoscopic Camera Training's Efficiency in Novices
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06044909 -
Multimodal Image Registration for Helping Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Guidance
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05389241 -
Laparoscopic Augmented Reality for Identification of Liver Lesions - a Pre-clinical Randomized Cross-over Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06255080 -
Comparing Skills Acquisition on Different Laparoscopy Software
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03234543 -
Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Abdominal Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02827292 -
Effect of Music on Inflammatory Response During Laparoscopic Surgery
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06092684 -
The Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine in Elective Laparoscopic Surgery
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT01008709 -
Comparison Study of Two Different Surgical Clips During Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05363813 -
Post-market Clinical Follow-up Study of Reusable Clip Applier Cartridge Devices for LAParoscopic Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03330236 -
EEG - Guided Anesthetic Care and Postoperative Delirium
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05031182 -
Tolerance of the vNOTES Surgical Technique in Total Hysterectomy for Benign Lesion. Clinical Trial of Non-inferiority Compared to the Laparoscopic Technique.
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05302622 -
Detecting the Most Efficient Residency Time for Laparoscopic Simulators
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03684291 -
Hemodynamic Effects of Ventilation Modes
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06117748 -
Volume-Controlled Ventilation and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation Volume Guaranteed in Obese Patients in Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03739944 -
Different Surgical Approaches in Patients of Early-stage Cervical Cancer
|
Phase 3 |