Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03435913
Other study ID # 2016/0602
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date April 19, 2018
Est. completion date November 21, 2018

Study information

Verified date December 2019
Source Hospital Universitario La Fe
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Objective: The aim of this project is to evaluate how intra-abdominal pressure paired coupled with different ventilatory positive end-expiratory pressure levels affects the transpulmonary driving pressure during pneumoperiteneum insufflation for laparoscopic surgery.

Methodology: Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery will be included. The study will investigate the relationship between intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and transpulmonary driving pressure (TpDp) and the effect of titration of PEEP on their relationship.

At three different levels of intra-abdominal pressure, the respiratory driving pressure (RDp) and TpDp in each subject will be measured in each subject. The same subject will undergo two different ventilation strategies. Demographic data (height, weight, body mass index and sex), ASA physical status (surgical risk classification of the American Society of Anesthesiology), number of previous abdominal surgeries, number of previous pregnancies, and respiratory comorbidities will be collected. Respiratory pressures and mechanics will be recorded at each level of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during each ventilatory strategy. The variables recorded will include: airway pressures (Plateau pressure Pplat, Peak pressure, Ppeak), the final esophageal pressure of inspiration and expiration and pulmonary stress index. Mixed linear regression will be used to evaluate the relationship between different PEEP levels, IAP and TpDp by adjusting for known confounders and adding individuals as a random factor. Likewise, an analysis using a mixed linear regression model with the pulmonary stress index as a function of the intra-abdominal pressure, the ventilation regime, and a specific random intercept term for each subject will be performed.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 30
Est. completion date November 21, 2018
Est. primary completion date November 21, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) risk scale I to III

- Age > 18 years

- Previously signed informed consent

- Undergoing laparoscopic surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

- ASA = IV

- Pregnancy

- Advanced liver, kidney or cardiopulmonary disease

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
Standard PEEP ventilation
During mechanical ventilation a fixed PEEP (5 mcH2O) is set at all IAP levels during pneumoperitoneum insufflation
Matched PEEP ventilation
During mechanical ventilation PEEP is matched to IAP level

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain Hospital Universitario La Fe Valencia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Hospital Universitario La Fe

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (4)

Cinnella G, Grasso S, Spadaro S, Rauseo M, Mirabella L, Salatto P, De Capraris A, Nappi L, Greco P, Dambrosio M. Effects of recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory mechanics and transpulmonary pressure during laparoscopic surgery. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jan;118(1):114-22. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182746a10. — View Citation

Cortes-Puentes GA, Gard KE, Adams AB, Faltesek KA, Anderson CP, Dries DJ, Marini JJ. Value and limitations of transpulmonary pressure calculations during intra-abdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1870-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a3bea. — View Citation

D'Antini D, Rauseo M, Grasso S, Mirabella L, Camporota L, Cotoia A, Spadaro S, Fersini A, Petta R, Menga R, Sciusco A, Dambrosio M, Cinnella G. Physiological effects of the open lung approach during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: focus on driving pressure. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Feb;84(2):159-167. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12042-0. Epub 2017 Jul 5. — View Citation

Neto AS, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, Beiderlinden M, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Futier E, Gajic O, El-Tahan MR, Ghamdi AA, Günay E, Jaber S, Kokulu S, Kozian A, Licker M, Lin WQ, Maslow AD, Memtsoudis SG, Reis Miranda D, Moine P, Ng T, Paparella D, Ranieri VM, Scavonetto F, Schilling T, Selmo G, Severgnini P, Sprung J, Sundar S, Talmor D, Treschan T, Unzueta C, Weingarten TN, Wolthuis EK, Wrigge H, Amato MB, Costa EL, de Abreu MG, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ; PROVE Network Investigators. Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Apr;4(4):272-80. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)00057-6. Epub 2016 Mar 4. Review. Erratum in: Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Jun;4(6):e34. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Transpulmonary driving pressure (TpDp) difference between standard and matched PEEP ventilation TpDp (assessed in centimeters of water, cmH20) as assessed by ventilatory pressure and pleural pressure (recorded by an esophageal probe) is recorded at every intra-abdominal pressure level during pneumoperitoneum insufflation. The primary outcome is the difference between a standard perioperative management (fixed PEEP + 15 mmHg pneumoperitoneum pressure) and matched PEEP to intra-abdominal pressure and 8mmHg intra-abdominal pressure Pneumoperitoneum insufflation before surgery (up to 30 minutes)
Secondary Transpulmonary driving pressure and intra-abdmominal pressure relationship (multivariate adaptive linear regression) TpDp (in cmH20) is recorded at different levels of IAP and with two different PEEP settings (in cmH20; two levels are: fixed at each IAP level, standard group and matched at each IAP level, matched group). The relationship between TpDp and IAP (both treated as continuous variables) at each PEEP level is plotted and a multiadaptive linear regression is fitted. Pneumoperitoneum insufflation before surgery (up to 30 minutes)
Secondary Transpulmonary driving pressure and respiratory driving pressure (RDp) relationship (multivariate adaptive linear regression). Respiratory driving pressure (transpulmonary driving pressure + pressure to move the chest wall, in cmH20, RpDp) and TpDp relationship at each IAP and PEEP level will be assessed. The relationship between TpDp and RpDp (both treated as continuous variables) at each PEEP level is plotted and a multiadaptive linear regression is fitted. Pneumoperitoneum insufflation before surgery (up to 30 minutes)
Secondary Respiratory system compliance (Crs) difference between standard and matched PEEP levels Respiratory system compliance measures the system's ability to stretch. It has two components Lung and Chest Wall (measured in milliliter/centimeters of water, ml/cmH20) Pneumoperitoneum insufflation before surgery (up to 30 minutes)
Secondary Pulmonary compliance (Cp) difference Respiratory system compliance measures the system's ability to stretch (ml/cmH20). It has two components Lung and Chest Wall (measured in milliliter/centimeters of water, ml/cmH20). By using an esophageal probe measurement the two can be partitioned and analyzed separately. Pneumoperitoneum insufflation before surgery (up to 30 minutes)
Secondary Chest wall compliance (CCw) difference Respiratory system compliance measures the system's ability to stretch (ml/cmH20). It has two components Lung and Chest Wall (measured in milliliter/centimeters of water, ml/cmH20). By using an esophageal probe measurement the two can be partitioned and analyzed separately. Pneumoperitoneum insufflation before surgery (up to 30 minutes)
Secondary Pulmonary Stress index difference Stress index is based on respiratory pressure curve analysis and assess whether the lungs are overdistended or collapsed Pneumoperitoneum insufflation before surgery (up to 30 minutes)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT04515485 - A Volumetric Nomogram for Height, Weight, and Intra Abdominal Volume
Completed NCT01725477 - Laparoscopic Tubal Patency Assessment N/A
Recruiting NCT01093079 - Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy - Surgical and Oncological Outcomes N/A
Recruiting NCT01093430 - Is the Anterior Superior Iliac Spine a Useful Landmark at Laparoscopy? N/A
Completed NCT00535990 - Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Database for the Purpose of Research
Completed NCT01092013 - Comparative Evaluation of Simulator Based and Traditional In-surgery Laparoscopic Camera Training's Efficiency in Novices N/A
Recruiting NCT06044909 - Multimodal Image Registration for Helping Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Guidance
Completed NCT06255080 - Comparing Skills Acquisition on Different Laparoscopy Software N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05389241 - Laparoscopic Augmented Reality for Identification of Liver Lesions - a Pre-clinical Randomized Cross-over Trial N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT03234543 - Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Abdominal Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT02827292 - Effect of Music on Inflammatory Response During Laparoscopic Surgery N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06092684 - The Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine in Elective Laparoscopic Surgery Phase 3
Terminated NCT01008709 - Comparison Study of Two Different Surgical Clips During Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05363813 - Post-market Clinical Follow-up Study of Reusable Clip Applier Cartridge Devices for LAParoscopic Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03330236 - EEG - Guided Anesthetic Care and Postoperative Delirium N/A
Recruiting NCT05031182 - Tolerance of the vNOTES Surgical Technique in Total Hysterectomy for Benign Lesion. Clinical Trial of Non-inferiority Compared to the Laparoscopic Technique. N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05302622 - Detecting the Most Efficient Residency Time for Laparoscopic Simulators N/A
Recruiting NCT03684291 - Hemodynamic Effects of Ventilation Modes
Recruiting NCT06117748 - Volume-Controlled Ventilation and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation Volume Guaranteed in Obese Patients in Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT03739944 - Different Surgical Approaches in Patients of Early-stage Cervical Cancer Phase 3