Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (VHR) is usually performed by reducing the contents in the hernia sac from the abdominal cavity and then covering the defect from the inside with a mesh, i.e. Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM). This means that the hernia sac is left in situ anterior to the mesh. This may, however, predispose for the development of fluid in the hernia sac, i.e. seroma. The risk of seroma development may be reduced if a the defect is closed before the mesh is applied. Closing the defect may, however, cause tension and pain from the abdominal wall. Instead of closing the defect, the part of the peritoneum constituting the hernia sac may be used for closing the defect. In this case, the peritoneum is dissected from the edges of the hernia sac and then used as a flap that is fixated to the edges of the hernia sac on the opposite side.

In order to evaluate whether peritoneal bridging reduces the seroma development following ventral hernia repair, we are undertaking a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing conventional closure of the hernia defect with peritoneal bridging. The goal is to randomize 50 patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia to conventional closure or closure of the defect with peritoneal bridging.

Clinical follow-up is performed one month and one year after surgery. At both occasions, the patient is requested to fill in the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire (VHPQ) and an investigation is done in order to assess the presence of seromas, recurrences or other local complications. One year after surgery, computer tomography is performed. The main purpose of the computer tomography is to quantify the presence of seromas.

The study is intended as phase 2 study with the aim of evaluating peritoneal bridging as an alternative to conventional defect closure. If the study shows that bridging does not lead to substantial seroma development, future studies with greater statistical power and other outcome measures will be undertaken.


Clinical Trial Description

Background

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (VHR) has become a well-established technique during the last decade. The repair is usually performed by reducing the contents in the hernia sac from the abdominal cavity and then covering the defect from the inside with a mesh, i.e. Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM). This means that the hernia sac is left in situ anterior to the mesh. This may, however, predispose for the development of fluid in the hernia sac, i.e. seroma. Even if the mesh prevents the intestines from protruding into the hernia sac, the patient may still be troubled by discomfort from the seroma that replaces the hernia..

The risk of seroma development may be reduced if a the defect is closed before the mesh is applied (IPOM-Plus). Closing the defect may, however, cause tension and pain from the abdominal wall. Instead of closing the defect, the part of the peritoneum constituting the hernia sac may be used for closing the defect. In this case, the peritoneum is dissected from the edges of the hernia sac and then used as a flap that is fixated to the edges of the hernia sac on the opposite side. This reduces the size of the pseudosac and the peritoneal surface, which prevents transudation to the pseudosac.

In order to evaluate whether peritoneal bridging reduces the seroma development following ventral hernia repair, we are undertaking a randomized controlled trial. Our goal is to include 50 patients in the study.

Method

After obtaining written and oral consent from the patient, the randomisation is performed through a sealed envelope system. The patient is blinded to the allocation. Prior to the procedure, the patient is also requested to fill in the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire (VHPQ).

The procedure is started according to the usual routines. Adhesions covering the defect are dissected in order to visualize the defect. If the patients has been randomized to defect closure, it is sutured with continuous PDS 2-0. . In case the patient is allocated to peritoneal bridging, the peritoneum is dissected beginning 2-3 cm from the edge of the defect. The sac is disected all the way to the opposite edge of the defect. The peritoneal flap is pulled to the opposite side and fixated with Optifix. One of the aims of the bridging is to to close the defect and increase the surface of contact between the mesh and the peritoneum.

The mesh is attached in the same, irrespective of randomization. Optifix with double-crown technique is used in both groups. Operation time and intraoperative complications are registered when the procedure is completed. From the day of the procedure until two days postoperatively, pain from the area of surgery is registered daily on a VAS-scale.

The patient is invited to clinical follow-up one month and one year after surgery. At both occasions the patient is requested to fill in VHPQ. One year after surgery, a computer tomography while straining in order to detect protrusion of the abdominal contents in the defect. Any protrusion seen at the computer tomography is graded according to a previously validated classification. The presence of seromas detected at the computer tomography is described according to Morales-Conde,

The computer tomography images are assessed by two radiologists in order to reach consensus. The presence of seroma anterior to the defect is evaluated in terms of size (maximal diameter), localization, shape (round, oval, triangular), mean density (Hounsfield unit, HU) and the volume through three-dimensional reconstructions. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03344575
Study type Interventional
Source Karolinska Institutet
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date July 1, 2017
Completion date December 31, 2019

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT04515485 - A Volumetric Nomogram for Height, Weight, and Intra Abdominal Volume
Completed NCT01725477 - Laparoscopic Tubal Patency Assessment N/A
Recruiting NCT01093430 - Is the Anterior Superior Iliac Spine a Useful Landmark at Laparoscopy? N/A
Recruiting NCT01093079 - Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy - Surgical and Oncological Outcomes N/A
Completed NCT01092013 - Comparative Evaluation of Simulator Based and Traditional In-surgery Laparoscopic Camera Training's Efficiency in Novices N/A
Completed NCT00535990 - Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Database for the Purpose of Research
Recruiting NCT06044909 - Multimodal Image Registration for Helping Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Guidance
Completed NCT06255080 - Comparing Skills Acquisition on Different Laparoscopy Software N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05389241 - Laparoscopic Augmented Reality for Identification of Liver Lesions - a Pre-clinical Randomized Cross-over Trial N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT03234543 - Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Abdominal Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT02827292 - Effect of Music on Inflammatory Response During Laparoscopic Surgery N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06092684 - The Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine in Elective Laparoscopic Surgery Phase 3
Terminated NCT01008709 - Comparison Study of Two Different Surgical Clips During Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05363813 - Post-market Clinical Follow-up Study of Reusable Clip Applier Cartridge Devices for LAParoscopic Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03330236 - EEG - Guided Anesthetic Care and Postoperative Delirium N/A
Recruiting NCT05031182 - Tolerance of the vNOTES Surgical Technique in Total Hysterectomy for Benign Lesion. Clinical Trial of Non-inferiority Compared to the Laparoscopic Technique. N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05302622 - Detecting the Most Efficient Residency Time for Laparoscopic Simulators N/A
Recruiting NCT03684291 - Hemodynamic Effects of Ventilation Modes
Recruiting NCT06117748 - Volume-Controlled Ventilation and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation Volume Guaranteed in Obese Patients in Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT03739944 - Different Surgical Approaches in Patients of Early-stage Cervical Cancer Phase 3