Knee Osteoarthritis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Older Persons With Knee Pain: Randomized Pilot Study
The purpose of this research is to study the effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on clinical pain, mobility disability, and pain sensitivity to gain a better understanding of the factors that cause pain and disability in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). In particular, people from different ethnic and racial groups may experience OA pain differently which is why the focus will be on older Asian Americans and non-Hispanic whites. It is important to find a reason for such difference so that a better treatment can be found for all OA patients. In addition, the research study will examine if there is any ethnic differences in pain and mobility disability. The investigator hypothesize that Asian Americans will report greater pain and mobility disability than non-Hispanic whites, and that active tDCS will result in improvement in pain and disability compared to sham tDCS.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | August 2016 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 45 Years to 85 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - they have self-reported unilateral or bilateral knee OA pain according to American College of Rheumatology criteria - they can understand, speak and read English - they are able to walk for 6-minutes - they are willing to be randomized to either the intervention or control group - they are available for five consecutive daily sessions and for a follow-up phone interview each week for three weeks post-stimulation sessions - they have no plan to change medication regimens for pain throughout the trial - they are willing and able to provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - knee replacement or non-arthroscopic surgery to the affected knee - serious medical illness, such as uncontrolled hypertension (i.e., Systolic Blood Pressure/Diastolic Blood Pressure of = 150/95), congestive heart failure, pacemaker, or history of acute myocardial infarction - peripheral neuropathy - systemic rheumatic disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and fibromyalgia - alcohol/substance abuse - cognitive impairment (i.e., Mini-Mental Status Exam score = 23) - history of brain surgery, tumor, seizure, stroke, or intracranial metal implantation - pregnancy or lactation for females - hospitalization within the preceding year due to psychiatric illness |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston | Houston | Texas |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston | University of Florida |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | NIH PROMIS-cognition will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline and day 5 | A score of 50 is the average and a score of 60 is better than average. A score of 40 is the worse score. | Change from baseline and day 5 | No |
Other | Safety questionnaire will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days. | This is a questionnaire to assess the presence and severity of adverse events such as headache, tingling, itching, and fatigue, on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being not at all and 10 being a highest degree. | Change from baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days | No |
Other | Coping Strategies Questionnaire-Revised will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline and day 5 | This is a questionnaire to assess pain coping strategies, such as distancing from pain, using a 7-point scale that ranges from never do that to always do that. The higher the scale the greater use. | Change from baseline and day 5 | No |
Other | Positive and Negative Affect Scale will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline and day 5 | This is a questionnaire using a 5-point scale that ranges from very slightly or not at all to extremely. The lower the scale the negative the affect and the higher the scare the positive the affect. | Change from baseline and day 5 | No |
Other | Pain Attitudes Questionnaire-Revised will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline and day 5 | This is a questionnaire to assess pain attitudes, such as stoicism, using a 5-point scale that ranges from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The higher the scale the more stoic. | Change from baseline and day 5 | No |
Primary | Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days. | Numeric Rating Scale for pain is an 101-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 being no pain at all and 100 being the worst pain imaginable. The higher the score the worse the pain. | Change from Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days | No |
Primary | Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline and day 5. | This is a index to rate the activity of pain based on a scale of difficulty: 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, 4 = Extreme; these are then added up for a summation score. The higher the score, the worse the pain. | Change from baseline and day 5 | No |
Primary | Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline and day 5 | This is a questionnaire to rate the pain intensity and related symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst possible; these are then added up for a summation score. The higher the score the worse the pain. | Change from baseline and day 5 | No |
Primary | Six-minute walk test will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline and day 5 | The six-minute walk test (6MWT) measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. The individual is allowed to self-pace and rest as needed as they traverse back and forth along a marked walkway. The lower the score the worse the condition. | Change from baseline and day 5 | No |
Primary | Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline and day 5 | This is a group of measures that combines the results of the gait speed, chair stand, and balance tests. The scores rand from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance). | Change from baseline and day 5 | No |
Primary | WOMAC physical function subscale will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline and day 5 | This is a index to rate the activity of physical function based on a scale of difficulty: 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, 4 = Extreme, these are then added up for a summation score. The higher the score, the worse the disability. | Change from baseline and day 5 | No |
Primary | Heat pain sensitivity will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline and day 5 | Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using heat pain delivered by using thermal probe on the skin. | Change from baseline and day 5 | No |
Primary | Pressure pain threshold will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days. | Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using pressure pain delivered by a hand-held algometer. | Change from Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days | No |
Primary | Punctate mechanical pain sensitivity will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline and day 5 | Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) by using punctate mechanical pain delivered by a calibrated nylon monofilament. | Change from baseline and day 5 | No |
Primary | Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) will be compared between the two groups for a change between baseline and day 5 | Conditioned pain modulation will be done by using a cold pressor procedure on the skin. | Change from baseline and day 5 | No |
Secondary | Composite measure of Blood Chemistries will be compared for differences between the groups for a change between baseline and day 5 | Change from baseline and day 5 | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04651673 -
Prescribed Knee Brace Treatments for Osteoarthritis of the Knee (Knee OA)
|
||
Completed |
NCT05677399 -
Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment With Peloidotherapy and Aquatic Exercise.
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04043819 -
Evaluation of Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of an Autologous Adipose-derived Cell Therapy Product for Treatment of Single Knee Osteoarthritis
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06000410 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Amniotic Suspension Allograft in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05014542 -
Needling Techniques for Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05892133 -
Prehabilitation Effect on Function and Patient Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05528965 -
Parallel Versus Perpendicular Technique for Genicular Radiofrequency
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03472300 -
Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02003976 -
A Randomized Trial Comparing High Tibial Osteotomy Plus Non-Surgical Treatment and Non-Surgical Treatment Alone
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04017533 -
Stability of Uncemented Medially Stabilized TKA
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04779164 -
The Relation Between Abdominal Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04006314 -
Platelet Rich Plasma and Neural Prolotherapy Injections in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05423587 -
Genicular Artery Embolisation for Knee Osteoarthritis II
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04145401 -
Post Market Clinical Follow-Up Study- EVOLUTION® Revision CCK
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03781843 -
Effects of Genicular Nerve Block in Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05974501 -
Pre vs Post Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05324163 -
Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of X0002 in Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05529914 -
Effects of Myofascial Release and Neuromuscular Training for Pes Anserine Syndrome Associated With Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05693493 -
Can Proprioceptive Knee Brace Improve Functional Outcome Following TKA?
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05510648 -
Evaluation of the Effect of High-intensity Laser Therapy in Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A |