View clinical trials related to Kidney Stone.
Filter by:Can Shear Wave Elastography predict the success of Shock-Wave Lithotripsy used in renal stones treatment ? A prospective study
The purpose of this study is to compare two variations of the mini-PCNL procedure using either a vacuum-assisted sheath or standard sheath which are both used for the surgical treatment of kidney stones. Both procedure types are commonly used in the treatment of kidneys stones and they have been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of stones similar in size and location to your own.
Nephrolithiasis is the most common chronic kidney condition and affecting approximately one in every 10-17 people in the world[1,2]. Flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) has become one of the most common treatments for ureteral and renal stones with minimal complications. The development of ureteral access sheath (UAS) is a significant advance in flexible ureteroscopic management of urinary stones. The UAS has two major advantages: 1) facilitating multiple entries into the renal collecting system without causing recurrent trauma to the ureter and permit expeditious basketing of multiple stone fragments, 2) improving the irrigation with better fluid outflow, thereby reducing the renal pelvic pressure (RPP) and risk of infectious complications. The tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath (S-UAS) is a novel UAS that has good flexibility and deformability at the tip, which can passively bend (bend >90°) with the bending of f-URS and can connect to a vacuum suction device. Preliminary study showed that S-UAS can follow f-URS to cross the UPJ and into the renal pelvis and calices. S-UAS close to the stone can achieve complete stone-free status in RIRS. However, further clinical studies and comparisons with available techniques are required. This prospective, single-blinded, single-center, randomized control trial will evaluate the stone free rates, operative time, postoperative complications following RIRS with S-UAS. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the clinical benefits of RIRS with S-UAS and traditional UAS.
In view of the positive results of the numerous studies conducted on forced diuresis after extra-corporeal lithotripsy, the investigators chose to evaluate forced diuresis by injection of Furosemide associated with intravenous hydration, which has never before been the subject of a specific analysis.
To identify predictors of patients postoperative readmission after PNL
This is a multi-center, prospective clinical trial to assess the effect of TFL for the lithotripsy of kidney stones.
Several studies evaluated the benefit of a short-term external ureteral catheter (UC) compared to double-J (DJ) ureteral stent after flexible ureteroscopy (URS); the results were controversial. These studies had combined analyses of ureteral and renal stones with a high risk of selection bias. Studies comparing external UC and DJ stent after flexible URS for isolated renal stones are lacking. In the present study, the investigators will compare the outcomes of using a one-day external UC versus a DJ internal ureteral stent for ureteral drainage after retrograde flexible URS (retrograde intrarenal surgery "RIRS") for renal stones. The investigators aim to identify the best ureteral drainage method after RIRS regarding stone clearance, complications, and stent-related symptoms.
Due to the anatomic characteristics of the lower calyx, lower pole stones are difficult to be eliminated through the ureter, even if the stones had been fragmented. Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) can be used to deal with lower pole stones of 1.0-2.0 cm, while percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) is mainly used to deal with lower pole stones with larger diameter or when RIRS failed to resolve the stone. This study was conducted to compare mini PCNL and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower pole kidney stones in terms of efficacy.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the Break Wave™ system in patients with upper urinary tract stones. The main question it aims to answer is whether the device is safe and effective in fragmenting (breaking) stones. Participants will a) undergo the Break Wave™ procedure, b) have a telehealth visit at 2 weeks, and c) return for an imaging study at approximately 10 weeks post-procedure.
This research study is to determine how well the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) works for kidney stone pain and any possible side effects.