View clinical trials related to Intraabdominal Infections.
Filter by:This observational study will enroll approximately 450 in patients. Patients treated with CAZ AVI for at least 1 dose at around 20 research centers in China will be enroll.
This is a prospective and exploratory study, which utilizes non-targeted metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) detecting drain fluid from patients who are suspected of postoperative abdominal infection. This study aims to explore the clinical value of mNGS in the rapid diagnosis of postoperative abdominal infection, to refine the pathogenic bacteria spectrum, and to establish a novel procedure for postoperative abdominal infection diagnosis.
A multicentre, open label, two-arm, parallel group, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial with internal pilot. A total of 1166 consenting adult patients with cIAI will be recruited and randomised on a 1:1 basis between 28-days antibiotics and standard care antibiotics. Patients will be followed up for 180 days to determine cost effectiveness and the rate of treatment failure in each group.
This is a research study to determine if a particular method of providing nutrition improves the clinical outcomes of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who have undergone abdominal surgery and would require nutrition delivered via the bloodstream (called total parenteral nutrition or TPN). The nutrition method we are testing is a structured nutrition delivery plan that involves tube feeding, oral nutrition supplements, and the use of a device (called an indirect calorimeter or IC) to measure calorie needs. This study will also use two devices to measure fat and muscle mass to examine changes during hospitalization. Subjects will be followed throughout hospitalization where nutrition status and fat and muscle mass will be closely monitored. Study activities will begin within 72 hours of a patient's abdominal surgery. TPN (total parenteral nutrition, a method of feeding that bypasses the usual process of eating and digestion) will be started, a non-invasive method of assessing calorie needs (indirect calorimetry (IC)) will be started, a urine sample will be collected to help assist in protein needs, and fat/muscle mass will be measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and an ultrasound. This is a minimal risk study and all products/devices used are non-invasive and FDA-approved. Indirect calorimetry and urine sample collection will be conducted every 3 days during the stay in the Intensive Care Unit - ICU, then every 5 days until hospital discharge. BIA and muscle ultrasound will be conducted every 7 days during ICU stay, then every 14 days until hospital discharge.
Intra-abdominal infection is one of the most serious complications after pancreatic resection. The preventive use of antibiotics intraoperatively could reduce the incidence rate of postoperative intra-abdominal infection. According to the previous retrospective study, changes of serum lactate level on postoperative day1 could predict the incidence rate of postoperative intra-abdominal infection. This prospective RCT is to further validate and promote the findings and conclusion.
Study C3591036 is a Phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of PF-06947386 in Japanese adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection requiring hospitalization. This is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. All eligible participants will receive intravenous infusion of PF-06947386 followed by intravenous infusion of metronidazole.
Worldwide emergence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) had become a major problem in ICU, with at least 10% of incidence at the admission in Europe. A systematic rectal swab is used in 70% of French ICU to detect intestinal ESBL-E carriage The relationship between intestinal carriage and ICU-acquired infection is not perfectly known. The investigators conducted a five years study monocentric retrospective observational cohort in patients with presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in systematic rectal swabs to investigate which type of infections and which bacteria are involved. The investigators also collect data about antibiotherapy used to treat these infections.
This is an open-label, randomized, multi-center, interventional, active-controlled Phase 4 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI versus BAT in the treatment of infected participants with selected infection types (Hospital Acquired Pneumonia [HAP] (including Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia [VAP]); Complicated Urinary-Tract Infection [cUTI]; Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection [cIAI]; Bloodstream Infection [BSI]) due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in China.This study will be an estimation study. The statistical inference will be based on point estimate and confidence interval.
Sepsis is the leading cause of death in intensive care units and a major public health concern in the world. Heparin, a widely used anticoagulant medicine to prevent or treat thrombotic disorders, has been demonstrated to prevent organ damage and lethality in experimental sepsis models. However, the efficacy of heparin in the treatment of clinical sepsis is not consistent. Caspase-11, a cytosolic receptor of LPS, triggers lethal immune responses in sepsis. Recently, we have revealed that heparin prevents cytosolic delivery of LPS and caspase-11 activation in sepsis through inhibiting the heparanase-mediated glycocalyx degradation and the HMGB1- LPS interaction, which is independent of its anticoagulant properties. In our study, it is found that heparin treatment could prevent lethal responses in endotoxemia or Gram-negative sepsis, while caspase-11 deficiency or heparin treatment failed to confer protection against sepsis caused by Staphylococcus aureus, a type of Gram-positive bacterium. It is probably that other pathogens such as Gram-positive bacteria might cause death through mechanisms distinct from that of Gram-negative bacteria. Peptidoglycan, a cell-wall component of Gram-positive bacteria, can cause DIC and impair survival in primates by activating both extrinsic and intrinsic coagulation pathways, which might not be targeted by heparin. We speculate that the discrepancy between the previous clinical trials of heparin might be due to the difference in infected pathogens. Thus, stratification of patients based on the type of invading pathogens might improve the therapeutic efficiency of heparin in sepsis, and this merits future investigations.
Sepsis is defined as systemic response to infection ,and it is a main problem in ICU and despite advance in supportive care, the mortality rate in patients with severe sepsis continues to exceed 30% [Bone RC 1993].The effects of bacterial invasion of body tissues result from combined actions of enzymes and toxins produced by micro-organisms themselves and by a network of proinflammatory mediators and cytokines as tumour necrosis factor α and interleukin 6 which are overexpressed after various noxious insults[P.Delong et al. 2006],[ Yealy et al. 2014]. the patients who are subjected to abdominal surgery in order to treat the cause surgically,and many of these surgical procedures are lengthy and are at risk for either pre-operatively or post-operatively with steady increase in intra-abdominal pressure(IAP) [Malbrain ML et al. 2007] Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is defined as IAP equal to or greater than 12 mmHg whereas abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is defined as IAP greater than 20 mmHg, abdominal perfusing pressure (APP) is used to predict prognosis of both IAH and ACS [Malbrain ML et al. 2006]. The choice for using a sedative agent in ICU for mechanically ventilated patients post-operatively is therefore a crucial one as these patients are under hyperstress state and often require drugs for sedation and analgesia[ Chanques G et al. 2006]. Analgesics and sedation agents have clearly been shown to alter cellular function and other mediators of immune system with wide range of immune modulation ,ranging from immunosuppressive effects to significant anti-inflammatory effects during endotoxaemia[ Taniguchi et al. 2004] Also sedation and /or analgesia have the potential to reduce IAP through improvement of abdominal wall compliance. Although propofol and dexmedetomidine are used for sedation in ICU there are limited data on their effects on inflammatory responses and IAP in septic patients. In clinical practice, septic patients treated with dexmedetomidine have shorter time on the ventilator as compared with those treated with lorazepam, a benzodiazepine and this beneficial effect of dexmedetomidine is more pronounced in septic patients than in nonseptic patients. This outcome may be partly the result of dexmedetomidine induced reduction in pulmonary inflammatory mediators and lung tissue damage.[ M. Ueki et al. 2014] Midazolam is known to inhibit certain aspects of the immune function. It was suggested that benzodiazepines bind to specific receptors on macrophages and inhibit their capacity to produce IL-1, IL-6, and TNFα. Propofol, nowadays, has become a preferred sedative in ICU because it offers advantages over benzodiazepines in terms of lack of accumulation, quick onset, easy adjustment, and fast recovery after discontinuation. [ Jacobi J et al. 2002]