Clinical Trials Logo

Interstitial Lung Diseases clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Interstitial Lung Diseases.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT00470327 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

A Study of the Natural Progression of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)

Start date: September 2005
Phase:
Study type: Observational

We propose to acquire data and blood samples on all patients being cared for by the Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) program. Additionally, we will collect data and blood samples from a control group for comparator purposes. In doing so, we will be able to describe the "phenotypic" expression of these diseases.

NCT ID: NCT00267800 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Interstitial Lung Diseases

Database of Interstitial Lung Diseases

Start date: January 2006
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The cause of most interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) is still unknown. Further research, for example to determine predisposing genetic factors, is therefore needed. A database with relevant clinical data and DNA/serum samples of ILD patients could facilitate future research on the cause of ILDs.

NCT ID: NCT00129701 Completed - Asthma Clinical Trials

Can we Reduce Hospital Attendance Without Compromising Care by the Use of Telephone Consultation

Start date: November 2003
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Consultation time in busy respiratory clinics is inevitably limited and attendance is often disruptive to patients' lives; involves time, expense, travel, and waiting; and can have effects upon occupation. Published work suggests that patient satisfaction with telephone consultations is high and this subject has recently been extensively reviewed by one of the study investigators. In respiratory medicine there is United States (US) data to suggest that the regular telephoning of adolescents with asthma by a specialist nurse can reduce unscheduled use of health service resources. In the United Kingdom (UK), a randomised, controlled trial in primary care has shown that, compared to face to face consultations, use of the telephone can enable greater numbers of patients with asthma to be reviewed. Another of the study investigators has undertaken a feasibility study in a general respiratory clinic and has shown the concept of alternating face to face consultation with telephone consultation to be acceptable to over 80% of patients. Over one third were assessed to be suitable in that they did not need to attend the clinic for either physical examination or for investigations. It is therefore proposed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, time savings and safety of the use of telephone consultation in 3 respiratory clinics in the Department of Respiratory Medicine at Charing Cross Hospital.