View clinical trials related to Intensive Care Unit.
Filter by:Hospital-acquired infections (HAI) have been shown to increase length of hospital stay and mortality. Infections acquired during a hospital stay have been shown to be preventable. The skin of patients is considered a major reservoir for pathogens associated with hospital-acquired infections, and has been suggested as a potential target for interventions to reduce bacterial burden and subsequent risk of infection. The use of daily Chlorhexidine (CHG) bathing in intensive care patients has been advocated to reduce many of the infections in critically ill patients. However, the effectiveness of CHG bathing to reduce ICU infections has varied considerably among published trials, making the effectiveness of CHG bathing in ICU patients uncertain.
Some ICU ventilated patients might present with large tidal volume despite very low or inexistant presser support. Patient-Self Inflicted Lung Injury (P-SILI) might appear related with large alveolar stretch an distension. Two clinical presentations are observed: patients with or without respiratory distress signs such as supra-clavicular depression and thoracic-abdominal asynchronies. The aim of this study is to compare the pulmonary physio(-patho)logical parameters of these two types of patients (eupneic or with respiratory distress signs), and presenting important TV in spite of a minimal adjustment of the ventilatory support, except for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS).
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) accounts for almost 10% of intensive care units (ICU) admissions. Three ARDS stages have been defined, based on the PaO2/FIO2 ratio measured with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≥5 cmH2O: mild (201-300 mmHg), moderate (200-101 mmHg), and severe (≤100mmHg). They represent 30.0%, 46.6%, and 23.4% of ARDS, respectively. Mechanical invasive ventilation (MV), the cornerstone of ARDS patient care, has a primary goal to protect the lung from ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Delivering MV in a prone position (PP) has been shown to improve oxygenation, protect the lung through a better homogenization of lung stress/strain, and stabilize hemodynamics. A meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials showed beneficial effect of PP vs. supine position (SP) in the most hypoxemic patients. A fifth randomized controlled trial further showed a significant reduction in mortality with PP in ARDS patients with PaO2/FIO2 <150 mmHg, when neuromuscular blockade and long prone positioning sessions were used. Therefore, PP has since been strongly recommended for ARDS patients with PaO2/FIO2 <150 mmHg. Yet, there is limited evidence in patients with mild to moderate ARDS. There are, however, strong arguments supporting the need for a new trial in ARDS patients with PaO2/FIO2 in the range 150-300 mmHg: 1. There is no trial that has specifically tested PP in this ARDS subset; 2. PP is safe and has become a standard of care in ICU; 3. Should VILI prevention be a mechanism through which PP improves survival, this should be involved in all ARDS patients; 4. The mortality at hospital discharge in this subset of ARDS remains significant, amounting to 34.9% (95% confidence intervals 31.4-38.5%) in mild and 40.3% (37.4-43.3) in moderate stages; 5. Among 580 patients with mild ARDS at admission to the ICU, in-hospital mortality was 10%, 30%, and 37% for those who improved, persisted, and worsened ARDS, respectively. 6. Finally, PP has been shown to be cost-effective under commonly accepted thresholds. The hypothesis is that in patients within the 150-300mmHg PaO2/FIO2 range at the time of ARDS diagnosis, PP can reduce mortality as compared to a similar group left in the SP.
Background: For patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) at the intensive care unit (ICU), oxygen therapy plays an important role in post resuscitation care. During hospitalisation, a lot of these patients occur with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Currently a wide oxygen target is recommended but no evidence regarding optimal treatment targets to minimise the prevalence of PAH exists. Methods: The RELIEPH trial is a substudy within the BOX (Blood pressure and OXygenation targets in post resuscitation care) trial. It is a single-center, parallel-group randomised controlled clinical trial. 300 patients with OHCA hospitalised at the ICU are allocated to one of the two oxygenation interventions, either a restrictive- (9-10 kPa) or liberal (13-14 kPa) oxygen target both within the recommended range. The primary outcome is the fraction of time with pulmonary hypertension (mPAP >25 mmHg) out of total time with mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes are: length of ICU stay among survivors, lactate clearance, right ventricular failure, 30 days mortality and plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level 48 hours from randomisation. Discussion: This study hypothesises that a liberal target of oxygen reduces the time with PAH during mechanical ventilation compared to a restrictive oxygen target in patients with OHCA at the ICU. When completed, this study hopes to provide new knowledge regarding which oxygen target is beneficial for this group of patients.
The gender, age, ICU diagnosis, basic diseases, antibiotic treatment plan, physiological indicators, duration of hospital stay, length of stay in ICU, hospitalization cost, prognosis and other discharge information of patients receiving tigecycline or polymyxin B admitted to the ICU of four provincial-level Grade A hospitals in Changsha, Hunan Province ,China from 2017 to 2021 were included. To analyze the therapeutic effect of tigecycline-based or polymyxin B-based antibiotic regimens and their effect on the prognosis of patients, and to conduct subgroup analysis.
Through clinical cases or retrospective work with small sample size, some authors have observed an improvement in hemodynamic parameters, with a reduction or even withdrawal of norepinephrine after administration of a single dose of hydroxocobolamin (HCB) in refractory vasoplegic shock (cardiac surgery, liver transplantation and septic shock). HCB produces beneficial alterations in NO metabolism and may be suitable in vasoplegic syndrome. In addition, HCB seems to be involved in the elimination of hydrogen sulfide which also has an endogenous vasodilator function in the vascular endothelium. By these different actions it would cause vasoconstriction in vascular smooth muscle cells. Previous reports demonstrate that HCB was useful for refractory vasoplegic syndrome. The investigators will conduct a retrospective data collection of patients who was given intravenous HCB for refractory vasoplegic shock since January 2019.
After cardiopulmonary bypass heart surgery, with the rewarming of body temperature, the metabolic capacity of the body is enhanced, the microcirculation is opened, and tissue perfusion is increased. At the same time, the body pays off the oxygen debt formed by the low temperature and reduced blood flow in cardiopulmonary bypass, so that the tissue oxygen demand increases and oxygen consumption increases.Analgesia and sedation are important treatment measures for patients after cardiopulmonary bypass. S-isomer of ketamine and eselamine enhanced the sedation and enhanced the analgesic effect, but whether it can improve the imbalance of oxygen supply and oxygen consumption after cardiopulmonary bypass is unknown.
Delirium is common in septic patients, especially those receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU). Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2 adrenoreceptor agonist with anxiolytic, sedative, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory effects. Use of dexmedetomidine in mechanically ventilated ICU patients is associated with less delirium and improved outcomes. However, dexmedetomidine infusion produces dose-dependent bradycardia and hypotension; these limited the use of dexmedetomidine in ICU patients. This study is designed to test the hypothesis that low-dose dexmedetomidine infusion can also reduce delirium in mechanically ventilated ICU patients with sepsis.
Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) undergo complex critical care treatment and are consequently surrounded by equipment and monitors contributing to high sound pressure levels. In addition, many medical and nursing ICU staff members work together with numerous visiting consultants resulting in an additional sound burden. As is already known, in the ICU environment, many activities carried out by healthcare professionals, require a high level of concentration. So, the noisy ICU environment causes interruptions in activities that require concentration and induce in this way, a higher potential for errors. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set standards for sound levels in hospitals with a recommendation for patient treatment areas. There is a clear trend for increasing hospital noise since the sixties. According to healthcare professionals, one of the strongest contributing factors of noise in the ICU environment are monitoring alarms as they occur very frequently. Additionally, ICU nurses experience high levels of stress towards clinical alarms and are becoming alarm fatigue, which means that the staff becomes desensitized because of an excessive number of alarms and may disable or silence alarms without checking the patient . Consensus dictates the importance of reducing sound pressure levels and the numerous alarm signals from monitor alarms in the ICU. In the study, we focus on busy predetermined areas in the ICU. This study aims to determine the effect of an intervention bundle, aimed at the reduction of "noise" (decibels) and its effect on health care professionals.
To compare a noninvasive and continuous radial artery blood pressure measurements utilizing ViTrack (developed by Dynocardia) to the standard of care radial artery catheterization, in patients undergoing surgery or those who are being cared for in the intensive care unit