Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06240858
Other study ID # (2022) Annual Audit No. (175)
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 1, 2022
Est. completion date November 30, 2023

Study information

Verified date February 2024
Source Second Hospital of Jilin University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this prospective study is to compare the clinical efficacy of self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hernia repair, in order to improve the outcome of inguinal hernia treatment. The main question it aims to answer is, in which procedure is the self-gripping mesh more effective. Participants will be divided into the TAPP group and the Lichtenstein group by random number table method, the TAPP group underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal preperitoneal hernia repair, and the Lichtenstein group underwent Lichtenstein hernia repair, both groups used self-gripping meshes. Researchers will compare the operation time, postoperative time out of bed, postoperative hospital stay, hospital costs and postoperative complications between the two groups to see the clinical efficacy of self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hernia repair.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 130
Est. completion date November 30, 2023
Est. primary completion date November 30, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Male
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Male patients aged 18 years and older. - Patients with a definite diagnosis of unilateral primary inguinal hernia. - Patients and their families were informed about the study protocol and agreed to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with femoral, recurrent, bilateral, incarcerated and strangulated hernias. - Patients with previous history of lower abdominal surgery. - Patients with contraindications to anaesthesia. - Patients with contraindications to laparoscopic surgery. - Failure to follow up patients as scheduled. - Patients with abdominal infections. - Those who cannot tolerate general anaesthesia surgery due to serious coagulation disorders, cardiopulmonary disorders, etc.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair.
The TAPP group used self-gripping mesh for laparoscopic transperitoneal preperitoneal hernia repair.
Lichtenstein hernia repair.
The Lichtenstein group used self-gripping mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair.

Locations

Country Name City State
China The Second Hospital of Jilin University Changchun Jilin

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Second Hospital of Jilin University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Incidence of moderate to severe pain at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to score the postoperative pain at 3 and 6 months. The score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain). 3 and 6 months after surgery.
Secondary Incidence of recurrent inguinal hernia at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Recurrence of inguinal hernia after surgery 3 and 6 months after surgery.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03023462 - Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT04272320 - The Efficacy of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT03904888 - Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT03856710 - Self Fixating Versus Stapled Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT02240550 - A Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of ProFlor vs. Lichtenstein for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT01679353 - Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Magnesium Added to Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine Alone in Caudal Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT01943760 - Tamadol Wound Infiltration in Children Under Inguinal Hernioplasty Phase 4
Recruiting NCT01450345 - Efficacy of Pre-operative Oral Pregabalin in Ambulatory Inguinal Hernia Repair for Post Operative Pain Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT00968773 - Rebound Hernia Repair Device Mesh Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT01000116 - Fibrin Glue Versus Tacked Fixation in Groin Hernia Repair (TAPP) N/A
Completed NCT01117337 - Comparing Non-fixation of Mesh to Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Phase 4
Terminated NCT00226161 - Chronic Pain After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy N/A
Completed NCT05837013 - Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia N/A
Recruiting NCT05058378 - Correlation Between Spinal Anesthesia and Perfusion Index
Completed NCT01637818 - Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT05879770 - Is the Use of Prolene as Sufficient as the Use of Wire in Shouldice Surgery to Keep the Recurrence Rate Low After One Year?
Completed NCT05159232 - Length of Hospital Stay in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Vs. Open Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia: A Randomised Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT05107986 - Laparoscopy in Complicated Groin Hernia
Active, not recruiting NCT04328597 - Portuguese Inguinal Hernia Cohort (PINE) Study
Completed NCT04033055 - Antalgic Efficacy of CycloMeshâ„¢ Soaked in Ropivacaine Hydrochloride in Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia. N/A