Clinical Trials Logo

Inguinal Hernia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Inguinal Hernia.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02001948 Completed - Postoperative Pain Clinical Trials

Intrathecal Morphine for Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Start date: July 2009
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different doses of intrathecal morphine (0.1 mg and 0.4 mg) combined with 7.5 mg of heavy bupivacaine on postoperative block regression times, postoperative analgesia and the severity of side effects, for inguinal hernia repairs.

NCT ID: NCT01943760 Completed - Children Clinical Trials

Tamadol Wound Infiltration in Children Under Inguinal Hernioplasty

Start date: September 2012
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Tramadol is a centrally acting analgesic, is primarily Indicated for the treatment of acute pain, moderate to severe. The hernioplasty in children is an outpatient procedure, and the possibility of postoperative analgesia with fewer systemic adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting make the tramadol infiltration a technique of interest. There is controversy about its effectiveness. The local effect of tramadol in hernioplasty was also studied by researchers with some better postoperative analgesia than with local anestetic . There are few studies with administration of tramadol for hernioplasty, Which led to the interest in this study.

NCT ID: NCT01896076 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

The Caudal Space in Children: Ultrasound Evaluation

Start date: June 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Caudal anesthesia is commonly employed in pediatrics to produce postoperative analgesia in low abdominal or urologic surgery. An exact understanding of the anatomy of the sacral area including sacral hiatus and surrounding structures is crucial to the success of caudal block. The aim of this study is to evaluate the anatomy of the caudal space in pediatrics by ultrasound evaluation.

NCT ID: NCT01883115 Recruiting - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

A Prospective Study Comparing Telescopic vs. Balloon Dissection in Single Incision Laparoscopic Inguinal Herniorraphy (SILTELESCOPIC)

SILTelescopic
Start date: February 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Our recent prospective randomized controlled study comparing single-port vs. multiport laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal herniorraphy (NCT 01660048) demonstrated superiority of the single-port technique in reducing post-op pain/analgesic requirements, quicker return to work/normal physical activities and improved cosmetic scar scores. During this study all patients underwent the initial extraperitoneal dissection with the distension balloon. However, the balloon itself costs AU $380 per device which represents a significant percentage of the overall cost of the procedure (when the hospital/operating rooms cost is approximately AU $2500 for a unilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair) especially if only unilateral inguinal herniorraphy is performed. The European Hernia Society Guidelines encourage the use of the distension balloon for the initial distension/dissection of the extraperitoneal space especially during the learning curve. This recommendation arises from the fact that during the conventional multiport repair the umbilical port allows only the insertion of the laparoscope and the extraperitoneal space cannot easily be dissected with the scope itself, especially in patients with well-developed linea alba extending down to the pubic symphysis, and the camera itself, if used as dissection device, would become smudged and it would have to be repeatedly withdrawn for cleaning. Yet this must occur since the extraperitoneal space must be dissected in the midline sufficiently for safe insertion of two additional 5 mm ports for insertion of dissecting instruments in order to complete the extraperitoneal space dissection and the repair. With single incision laparoscopic surgery the use of the Triportâ„¢ system ensure that the port can be place under direct vision into the extraperitoneal space when the scope and two dissecting instruments can be safely inserted at the outset. In this way the extraperitoneal space can be dissected under direct vision. The balloon dissection is essentially a blind dissection even though the balloon distension is being observed by the scope, incorrect tissue planes can be entered ie the dissection can occur below the pre-peritoneal fascia exposing the nerves in the groin with the potential risks for nerve damage and entrapment. This is an argument that surgeons who practise transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair use to justify their superior technique over the TEP repair because, in the TAPP repair, the peritoneum is carefully dissected free from and leaving the underlying preperitoneal fascia intact. While the use of the balloon, when some 25 "pumps" of air are used during the insufflation, to create a significant space to place not only the two 5 mm ports but also to create a significant extraperitoneal dissection when usually only the lateral space and the hernia sac need to be dissected this is not always possible. In patients who have had previous lower abdominal surgery including previous anterior inguinal herniorraphy (especially if the mesh plug is used) the balloon dissention is normally judicious as one cannot predict whether there are any significant peritoneal or even bowel adhesions. Consequently, in such cases, the balloon distension is normally confined to an area just inferior to the umbilical port and superior to the pubic symphysis so that there is just enough extraperitoneal dissection to place the two 5 mm trocars. Usually this means only using only 5 pumps of air in the distension balloon for placement of two 5 mm trocars. Then the dissection of the extraperitonealy space under direct vision can take place. The use of the distension balloon in such cases represents an enormous waste of resources since AU $380 is spent just to create enough space to place the two 5 mm ports and hence allowing the insertion of the dissecting instruments. With the Triport+â„¢ port the dissecting instruments can easily be placed in the extraperitoneal space and the dissection can begin under direct vision hence achieving the same safe dissection that TAPP surgeons claim to perform. In this study we aim to look at the safety and efficacy of telescopic vs. balloon dissection by prospectively comparing a similar former group of patients to the ones who had previously undergone single-port inguinal herniorraphy with balloon dissection in our previous study (NCT 01660048). All patients having surgical treatment of groin hernia at St Luke's and Holroyd Private Hospitals are subject to very careful assessment and study. All patients are requested to report immediately if there are any problems.

NCT ID: NCT01760395 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Complications in Inguinal Hernia Surgery

Start date: January 2002
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Inguinal hernia repair is the most common procedure in general surgery. Even with acceptable complication rates, thousands of patients worldwide suffer from inguinal hernia surgery complications every year. In Finland, the Finnish Patient Insurance Centre (FPIC) receives reports from surgical complications. In this study, the database of FPIC is used to compare the complication profiles of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery with mesh.

NCT ID: NCT01740193 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Comparison of Two Different Pain Management Techniques in Pediatric Patients Undergoing a Hernia Repair

Start date: August 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this research study is to find the best way to decrease pain in children right after surgery whom have had their hernia fixed. Right now, there are two different ways surgeons and anesthesia providers try to decrease pain. It is not clear if one way is better than the other. The method used is often chosen by which one the doctor has more experience using. The Investigator plans to find out if one of the methods is more effective and/or safer than the other method. The results of this study will help learn how to best control pain in children having surgery for hernia repair.

NCT ID: NCT01722253 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Postoperative Analgesia After Low Frequency Electroacupuncture

LFE
Start date: December 2008
Phase: Phase 0
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this study is to determine whether electroacupuncture is a effective tool to the postoperative analgesia

NCT ID: NCT01701778 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Caudal Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Supplementation of Caudal Analgesia in Children

Start date: October 2012
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of caudal dexmedetomidine with intravenous dexmedetomidine on caudal levobupivacaine analgesia in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.

NCT ID: NCT01699971 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Three Different Techniques for Open Hernia Repair

Start date: October 2006
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary aim is to evaluate if PSH and/or ultrapro mesch reduces chronic groin pain postoperatively compared to lichtenstein mesh. The second aim is to evaluate quality of life, recovery from surgery and frequency of recurrencies in the three groups

NCT ID: NCT01698268 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Study of Transverse Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Children Undergoing Hydrocelectomy and/or Hernia Repair Surgery

TAP
Start date: February 2012
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Study measures the difference in pain after hernia &/or hydrocele repair based on site of local anesthesia injection.