View clinical trials related to Inguinal Hernia.
Filter by:This is a prospective, randomized double-blinded study to find out if mesh fixation with n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) are more painless than conventional mesh fixation with sutures in inguinal hernia operation (Lichtenstein procedure) in day-case surgery. Our hypothesis is that glue fixation is safe, simple and fast method compared to conventional Lichtenstein technique.
This study aims to assess the need to stop Aspirin before elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. It will consist of 2 arms: patients who continue to take Aspirin perioperatively and patients who stop Aspirin 5-7 days before the surgery.
Significant concern regarding the safety of general anesthesia in children has arisen due to myriad animal studies suggesting neurotoxicity of commonly used anesthetic agents. Inflammation of the central nervous system after anesthesia may have a significant role in the pathogenesis of anesthetic-induced neural injury. To evaluate this hypothesis, the investigators propose to randomize healthy infants undergoing elective surgery to one of two anesthetics: 1) spinal anesthesia only; or 2) general inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane, laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or endotracheal tube (ETT), and single-shot caudal block. Primary endpoint will be serum inflammatory biomarkers and transcriptome analysis and secondary endpoint will be neurocognitive outcome at 6 months and 1 year.
Prospective observational study with mesh fixation using FDA approved synthetic glue,glubran 2 and standard mesh fixation with stiches in primary inguinal hernia repair surgery. The investigators aim is to recruit 150 patients for the study. The outcomes The investigators would like to determine are : postoperative pain,recurrences and complication rates such as seromas.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of HQ® Matrix Soft Tissue Mesh for the Treatment of Inguinal Hernia. Half of participants will receive HQ® Matrix Soft Tissue Mesh, while the other half will receive ULTRAPRO® Partially Absorbable Lightweight Mesh.
A clinical study evaluating acute and chronic pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair comparing the ProGripTM self- fixating mesh with tack fixation.
The aim of this RCT is to compare patient outcomes of inguinal hernioplasty under Local Anaesthesia alone versus Local Anaesthesia and Conscious Sedation Specific study objectives are to determine the effect of conscious sedation on: (i) patient satisfaction (ii) postoperative pain (iii) time to discharge (iv) intraoperative complications (v) postoperative functional status (vi) short-term postoperative complications (vii) long-term postoperative complications
Aim The overall aim with this study is to improve outcome after inguinal hernia repair (IHR). It is not known today if a re-operation due to recurrence after bi-layer mesh IHR is more complicated than compared with the golden standard method. Method This project is a registry study. The National hernia register (Svenskt bråckregister, SBR) which started in 1992 include data that cover nearly 100% of all the country's hernia operations. Patient data are collected from SBR. Patients who at the time of surgery were between 18-75 years of age and operated on due to primary inguinal hernia with any of the two mentioned techniques between 1992-2012 are eligible
Mesh fixation is used to prevent recurrence in TEP to the potential cost of pain. The aim was to evaluate the impact of permanent fixation (PF) versus non-permanent fixation (N-PF) of mesh in TEP repair for a primary inguinal hernia regarding chronic pain. A cohort of patients were studied for pain interfering with sexual activety. The hyopthesis is that fixation causes pain.
The aim of this study is to compare the geriatric patients with the non-geriatrics undergoing outpatient unilateral herniorrhapy in terms of local anesthesia, sedation, recovery and early morbidity.