Oral Versus Vaginal Progesterone in the Luteal Support in Cryo-warmed Embryo Transfer Cycles

Infertility Clinical Trial

Official title:

Oral Dydrogesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone in the Luteal Phase Support in Cryo-warmed Embryo Transfer Cycles: Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03619707
• Other study ID #: AmericanUBMC-CWET
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: August 1, 2018
• Est. completion date: October 1, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: July 2023
• Source: American University of Beirut Medical Center
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

In IVF/ICSI cycles, the progesterone levels induced by ovarian stimulation are low, therefore the luteal phase is supported by progesterone. The use of progestogens in IVF is associated with an improvement in the live birth rate Standard protocol for luteal phase support has not yet been established. Currently vaginal progesterone is widely used, since the classic oral progesterone seems to result in a low bioavailability and a lower pregnancy rate. However, vaginal administration of progesterone is associated with vaginal irritation, discharge and bleeding. For all these reasons, there is a need for an effective, well tolerated, and safe treatment that can improve patient satisfaction and compliance. Many studies have observed similar pregnancy rate results with dydrogesterone and micronized vaginal progesterone. A new RCT including a total of 1143 patients by Tournaye, showed that dydrogesterone treatment had a similar safety profile to micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) for luteal support as part of ART treatment. The crude pregnancy rates at 12 weeks were 37.6% and 33.1% in the dydrogesterone and MVP treatment groups respectively. Regarding the administration route of progesterone, intramuscular and transvaginal routes are the two conventional progesterone administration techniques. However, very few studies have compared the advantages of oral dydrogestrone with vaginal progesterone for luteal support in ART cycles. The objective of the investigator's study is to demonstrate the superiority of oral dydrogesterone (Duphaston) 10 over MVP (Utrogestan) used for luteal supplementation in cryo-warmed embryo transfer cycles. Upon consent, 224 patients women will be randomly allocated into either one of the study groups using a simple randomization method by computer-generated random numbers. Group I will receive the oral dydrogesterone, while group II will receive the vaginal microprogesterone.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 157
• Est. completion date: October 1, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: August 1, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 18 Years to 38 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Normal uterine cavity
• Normal Hormonal investigation: TSH,PRL,FBS
• Frozen embryo transfer cycles: at least 2 embryos
• Primary or secondary infertility: tubal occlusion, male factor, unexplained, endometriosis, ovarian factors…
• Body mass index (BMI) =18 to =30 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

• Preexisting untreated medical condition (thyroid disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, pulmonary conditions, cardiac condition…)
• History of three or more consecutively failed In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles after embryo transfer
• History of three or more miscarriages
• Previous allergy reactions to progesterone products

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Infertility
• Sterility

Intervention

Drug:
• Progesterone
Patients will be randomly assigned during the treatment follow up, at the time of addition of progesterone to the regimen, following computerized random number generator in procedure, to one of the study groups. Patients will be aware of the allocated arm since the treatment drugs have different route of administration. Group I will receive the oral dydrogesterone, while group II will receive the vaginal microprogesterone.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Lebanon	American University of Beirut Medical Center	Beirut

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
American University of Beirut Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Lebanon, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Live births per embryo transferred	Number of live births per number of embryos transferred	until date of delivery
Secondary	Ongoing or Clinical pregnancy rate per started treatment cycle (CPR)	The presence of a viable fetus at 20 weeks gestation or fetal heart beat on transvaginal ultrasound after 6-7 weeks of gestation	20 weeks from Last Menstrual Period (LMP)
Secondary	Implantation rate (IR)	Number of intrauterine gestational sacs observed on transvaginal ultrasound divided by the number of transferred embryos	7 weeks from LMP
Secondary	Miscarriage rates	Pregnancy loss prior to 12 weeks of gestation	From a positive pregnancy test till 12 weeks gestation
Secondary	Multiple gestation rate	More than one intra-uterine gestation sac at 6 weeks of gestation	6-7 weeks of gestation