Oral Versus Vaginal Progesterone in the Luteal Support in Cryo-warmed

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

In IVF/ICSI cycles, the progesterone levels induced by ovarian stimulation are low, therefore the luteal phase is supported by progesterone. The use of progestogens in IVF is associated with an improvement in the live birth rate Standard protocol for luteal phase support has not yet been established. Currently vaginal progesterone is widely used, since the classic oral progesterone seems to result in a low bioavailability and a lower pregnancy rate. However, vaginal administration of progesterone is associated with vaginal irritation, discharge and bleeding. For all these reasons, there is a need for an effective, well tolerated, and safe treatment that can improve patient satisfaction and compliance. Many studies have observed similar pregnancy rate results with dydrogesterone and micronized vaginal progesterone. A new RCT including a total of 1143 patients by Tournaye, showed that dydrogesterone treatment had a similar safety profile to micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) for luteal support as part of ART treatment. The crude pregnancy rates at 12 weeks were 37.6% and 33.1% in the dydrogesterone and MVP treatment groups respectively. Regarding the administration route of progesterone, intramuscular and transvaginal routes are the two conventional progesterone administration techniques. However, very few studies have compared the advantages of oral dydrogestrone with vaginal progesterone for luteal support in ART cycles. The objective of the investigator's study is to demonstrate the superiority of oral dydrogesterone (Duphaston) 10 over MVP (Utrogestan) used for luteal supplementation in cryo-warmed embryo transfer cycles. Upon consent, 224 patients women will be randomly allocated into either one of the study groups using a simple randomization method by computer-generated random numbers. Group I will receive the oral dydrogesterone, while group II will receive the vaginal microprogesterone.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03619707
Study type	Interventional
Source	American University of Beirut Medical Center
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	Phase 4
Start date	August 1, 2018
Completion date	October 1, 2021

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT03607409` - Role of Inhibin A as Biomarker for Ovarian Response for IVF Treatment
Recruiting	`NCT02312076` - GnRHa for Luteal Phase Support in Long GnRHa Protocol Cycles	Phase 4
Terminated	`NCT02161861` - Improvement of IVF Fertilization Rates, by the Cyclic Tripeptide FEE - Prospective Randomized Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT03287479` - Comparison of a Semi-automated Closed Vitrification System (Gavi®) With a Manual Open Vitrification Sytem (Cryotop®)	N/A
Terminated	`NCT03522350` - Randomized Trial Comparing EmbryoScope With EmbryoScope+.	N/A
Completed	`NCT04496284` - Embryo Transfer Outcomes After Vitrification With Slush Nitrogen Compared to Liquid Nitrogen	N/A
Completed	`NCT03623659` - pArtiaL zonA pelluciDa Removal by assisteD hatchINg of Blastocysts	N/A
Completed	`NCT03895099` - New Ovarian Stimulation With Random Start, Use of Progestin Protocol for Oocyte Donors	Phase 3
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04142112` - Randomized, Standard-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Ohana IVF Sperm Preparation Kit, SPeRtility IVF Next Generation	N/A
Completed	`NCT03152643` - Cumulative Live Birth Rates After Cleavage-stage Versus Blastocyst-stage Embryo Transfer	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03683771` - Assessment of Endometrial Pattern and Sub-endometrial Vascularity in ICSI Outcome
Recruiting	`NCT03161119` - Comparing Two Different Embryo Transfer Catheters	N/A
Completed	`NCT04108039` - Micronized Progesterone vs Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist in Freeze-all IVF Cycles.	N/A
Completed	`NCT03678571` - Oocyte Vitrification Aided With Latrunculin A	N/A
Completed	`NCT03678584` - Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Chaetoglobosin A ( ICSI-CA)	N/A
Completed	`NCT03678558` - Oocyte Vitrification Aided With Cytochalasin B	N/A
Completed	`NCT03678818` - Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Latrunculin A (ICSI-LA)	N/A
Completed	`NCT03678597` - Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Latrunculin B ( ICSI-LB)	N/A
Completed	`NCT03678610` - Handling Medium for ICSI With Ionomycin and Latrunculin A	N/A
Completed	`NCT03677492` - Supplementing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Handling Medium With Cytochalasin D ( ICSI-CD)	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Oral Versus Vaginal Progesterone in the Luteal Support in Cryo-warmed Embryo Transfer Cycles

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms