Home Monitoring in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis; Improving Use of Anti-fibrotic Medication and Quality of Life

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Trial

Official title:

Home Monitoring in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis; Improving Use of Anti-fibrotic Medication and Quality of Life

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03420235
• Other study ID #: NL62925.078.17
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 9, 2018
• Est. completion date: August 26, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: January 2020
• Source: Erasmus Medical Center
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

In this study it will be investigate whether a home monitoring program improves disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) through appropriate medication use and subsequently results in better objective and subjective outcomes.

Description:

IPF is a chronic disease with progressive scarring of the lung tissue (fibrosis), resulting in a poor prognosis and a devastating impact on the lives of patients and their families. Progressive shortness of breath, cough and fatigue are major factors influencing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with IPF. Recently two anti-fibrotic drugs became available that slow down disease progression. The availability of effective drugs for this devastating disease has importantly changed daily care and research in IPF. Currently, one of the major challenges in daily IPF care is the evaluation of how individual patients objectively and subjectively experience treatment and benefit from treatment. The use of information communication technology in health care, also named e-health, is a promising solution to improve the quality of care. E-health allows remote exchange of data between patients and health care professionals which enables monitoring, research and management of long term conditions. Also communication between patients and physicians, and physicians mutually, becomes more accessible. This creates an opportunity for earlier intervention by health care professionals, which may prevent a hospital admission. This might improve quality of life and reduce costs. Patients easily get access to up-to-date and tailored information, in an interactive way. By providing these tools, patients may better understand their health conditions and become actively involved in management of their own health care, which may lead to a better health status. An 'internet tool' for patients with IPF have been developed, providing information and enabling them to keep track of their own symptoms, HRQOL scores, medication use and lung function results.

In this study it will be investigated whether a home monitoring program improves disease-specific HRQOL for IPF patients through appropriate medication use and subsequently results in better objective and subjective outcomes.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 90
• Est. completion date: August 26, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: August 26, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• All patients with a diagnosis of IPF according to the ATS 2011 criteria and about to start on anti-fibrotic treatment (either nintedanib or pirfenidone)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Not able to speak, read or write in Dutch

• No access to internet

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Fibrosis
• Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
• Pulmonary Fibrosis

Intervention

Other:
• Home monitoring program
The home monitoring program consists of 1) the use of an interactive internet tool to coach patients and enhance self-management 2) home-based pulmonary function testing with a handheld spirometer and 3) recording of patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Netherlands	Erasmus MC	Rotterdam	Zuid-Holland

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Erasmus Medical Center	OLVG, St. Antonius Hospital, Zuyderland Medical Centre

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Home monitoring values of FVC compared to in hospital values of lung function	Home monitoring values compared to in hospital values of lung function	12 weeks after inclusion
Other	Home monitoring values of FVC compared to in hospital values of lung function	Home monitoring values compared to in hospital values of lung function	24 weeks after inclusion
Other	Correlation between FVC measurements and K-BILD	Correlation between FVC and K-BILD. The K-BILD is a 15-item self-administered questionnaire on a 7-point response scale. It has three domains: breathlessness and activities, psychological and chest symptoms.The domain and total score ranges are 0-100, with the higher scores corresponding with better HRQL.	12 weeks after inclusion
Other	Correlation between FVC measurements and K-BILD	Correlation between FVC and K-BILD. The K-BILD is a 15-item self-administered questionnaire on a 7-point response scale. It has three domains: breathlessness and activities, psychological and chest symptoms.The domain and total score ranges are 0-100, with the higher scores corresponding with better HRQL.	24 weeks after inclusion
Other	Correlation between FVC measurements and EQ5D	Correlation between FVC and EQ5D. The EQ5D is a standardized instrument to measure health outcomes in two components: health description and valuation. It comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression on a 5-point scale. From these 5 answers an index value is derived between 0 and 1, with a higher value corresponding with a better QoL. In the valuation part the patients' general health status is evaluated using a VAS-score from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a better QoL.	12 weeks after inclusion
Other	Correlation between FVC measurements and EQ5D	Correlation between FVC and EQ5D. The EQ5D is a standardized instrument to measure health outcomes in two components: health description and valuation. It comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression on a 5-point scale. From these 5 answers an index value is derived between 0 and 1, with a higher value corresponding with a better QoL. In the valuation part the patients' general health status is evaluated using a VAS-score from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a better QoL.	24 weeks after inclusion
Other	Correlation between FVC measurements and HADS	Correlation between FVC and HADS. The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire with 7 questions in the domain anxiety and 7 questions in the domain depression on a 0-3 Likert scale. Higher values represent higher anxiety and depression levels, with a maximum of 21 point in both domains. There is a cut-off score of 8/21 for anxiety and depression.	12 weeks after inclusion
Other	Correlation between FVC measurements and HADS	Correlation between FVC and HADS. The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire with 7 questions in the domain anxiety and 7 questions in the domain depression on a 0-3 Likert scale. Higher values represent higher anxiety and depression levels, with a maximum of 21 point in both domains. There is a cut-off score of 8/21 for anxiety and depression.	24 weeks after inclusion
Other	Correlation between FVC measurements and GRC	Correlation between FVC and GRC. The Global Rating of Change (GRC) measures whether QoL has improved or deteriorated over a certain period of time, with scores range from -7 to +7, with positive scores corresponding with improvement in QoL.	12 weeks after inclusion
Other	Correlation between FVC measurements and GRC	Correlation between FVC and GRC. The Global Rating of Change (GRC) measures whether QoL has improved or deteriorated over a certain period of time, with scores range from -7 to +7, with positive scores corresponding with improvement in QoL.	24 weeks after inclusion
Other	Correlation between VAS score on stability of IPF scored by patients and healthcare providers	Both patients and healthcare providers will score a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with a score between 0 (not stable) and 10 (very stable) on stability of IPF at baseline. Correlation between the VAS scores from patients and healthcare providers will be assessed.	Baseline
Other	Correlation between VAS score on stability of IPF scored by patients and healthcare providers	Both patients and healthcare providers will score the stability of their IPF on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The visual analogue scale has a score between 0 (very unstable) and 10 (very stable), therefore higher scores correspond with better outcomes. Correlation between the VAS scores from patients and healthcare providers will be assessed at 12 weeks.	12 weeks
Other	Correlation between VAS score on stability of IPF scored by patients and healthcare providers	Both patients and healthcare providers will score the stability of their IPF on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The visual analogue scale has a score between 0 (very unstable) and 10 (very stable), therefore higher scores correspond with better outcomes. Correlation between the VAS scores from patients and healthcare providers will be assessed at 24 weeks.	24 weeks
Primary	Difference in the change in total score of King's brief Interstitial Lung Disease Health Status (K-BILD) questionnaire between the home monitoring group and the standard care group	Change in HRQOL assessed by the K-BILD, between control group and home monitoring group at the end of the study. The K-BILD is a 15-item self-administered questionnaire on a 7-point response scale. It has three domains: breathlessness and activities, psychological and chest symptoms.The domain and total score ranges are 0-100, with the higher scores corresponding with better HRQL.	24 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	Difference in the change in total score of King's brief Interstitial Lung Disease Health Status (K-BILD) questionnaire between the home monitoring group and the standard care group	Change in HRQOL assessed by the K-BILD, between control group and home monitoring group. The K-BILD is a 15-item self-administered questionnaire on a 7-point response scale. It has three domains: breathlessness and activities, psychological and chest symptoms.The domain and total score ranges are 0-100, with the higher scores corresponding with better HRQL.	12 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores (GRC)	Patients will fill in the Global Rating of Change (GRC) which measures whether QoL has improved or deteriorated over a certain period of time, with scores range from -7 to +7, with positive scores corresponding with improvement in QoL	12 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores (EQ5D)	Patients will complete the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, a standardized instrument to measure health outcomes in two components: health description and valuation. It comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression on a 5-point scale. From these 5 answers an index value is derived between 0 and 1, with a higher value corresponding with a better QoL. In the valuation part the patients' general health status is evaluated using a VAS-score from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a better QoL.	12 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores (HADS)	Patients will complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), a 14-item questionnaire with 7 questions in the domain anxiety and 7 questions in the domain depression on a 0-3 Likert scale. Higher values represent higher anxiety and depression levels, with a maximum of 21 point in both domains. There is a cut-off score of 8/21 for anxiety and depression.	12 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores (HADS)	Patients will complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), a 14-item questionnaire with 7 questions in the domain anxiety and 7 questions in the domain depression on a 0-3 Likert scale. Higher values represent higher anxiety and depression levels, with a maximum of 21 point in both domains. There is a cut-off score of 8/21 for anxiety and depression.	24 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores (EQ5D)	Patients will complete the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, a standardized instrument to measure health outcomes in two components: health description and valuation. It comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression on a 5-point scale. From these 5 answers an index value is derived between 0 and 1, with a higher value corresponding with a better QoL. In the valuation part the patients' general health status is evaluated using a VAS-score from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a better QoL.	24 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores (GRC)	Patients will complete the Global Rating of Change (GRC) which measures whether QoL has improved or deteriorated over a certain period of time, with scores range from -7 to +7, with positive scores corresponding with improvement in QoL.	24 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	Patient expectations and satisfaction with medication (PESaM scores)	Correlation between patient expectations with medication and consecutive experiences measured with the PESaM questionnaire which assess patient expectations at baseline in an 11-item questionnaire and patient experiences and side-effects with medication after 12 weeks in a 26-item questionnaire on a 0-4 Likert scale. For each question it is different whether a higher score represents better or worse outcomes.	Baseline and 12 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	Patient expectations and satisfaction with medication (PESaM scores)	Correlation between patient expectations with medication and consecutive experiences measured with the PESaM questionnaire which assess patient expectations at baseline in an 11-item questionnaire and patient experiences and side-effects with medication after 24 weeks in a 26-item questionnaire on a 0-4 Likert scale. For each question it is different whether a higher score represents better or worse outcomes.	Baseline and 24 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	Patient satisfaction with medication (PESaM scores)	Overall patient satisfaction with medication after 24 weeks resulting from the 26-item PESaM questionnaire. For each question it is different whether a higher score represents better or worse outcomes	24 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	Patient satisfaction with the care process	Evaluation and satisfaction questionnaire at the end of the study. 10-item questionnaire with answers on a scale from -5 to 5, with higher scores corresponding with higher satisfaction	24 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	Number of patients who discontinue use of medication, pills used and pills wasted	Every week patients register whether they missed pills (and the amount of pills wasted). Discontinuation or switch of medication is registered both by patients and researchers.	24 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	Amount of contacts with healthcare providers and number of visits per patient	During the study patients register their contacts with healthcare providers (hospital visits, general practitioner visits, physiotherapist, dietician, psychologist), after 24 weeks the amount of contacts will be assessed	24 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	FVC decline	FVC decline measured by hospital-based spirometry and daily home spirometry	12 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	FVC decline	FVC decline measured by hospital-based spirometry and daily home spirometry	24 weeks after inclusion
Secondary	Personal goal of patient defined at start of study	Change in score of personal goal. Patients define a personal goal at the start of the study and they score on a scale from 0 -10 how far they have reached their goal	24 weeks after inclusion