Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03067441
Other study ID # 1002-050
Secondary ID 2016-004115-12
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date February 3, 2017
Est. completion date November 5, 2019

Study information

Verified date February 2021
Source Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to see if bempedoic acid (ETC-1002) is safe and well-tolerated in patients with high cardiovascular risk and elevated LDL cholesterol that is not adequately controlled by their current therapy.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 1462
Est. completion date November 5, 2019
Est. primary completion date November 5, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Successfully completed CLEAR Harmony (1002-040) parent study Exclusion Criteria: - Experienced a treatment-related SAE that led to study drug discontinuation in the CLEAR Harmony (1002-040) parent study. - Medical condition requires lipid measurement and/or adjustment of background lipid-regulating therapy.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
bempedoic acid
bempedoic acid 180 mg tablets taken orally, once per day.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Sentral Clinical Research Services Cincinnati Ohio
United States L-MARC Research Center Louisville Kentucky
United States Jedidiah Clinical Research Tampa Florida

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (5)

Goldberg AC, Hopkins PN, Toth PP, Ballantyne CM, Rader DJ, Robinson JG, Daniels SR, Gidding SS, de Ferranti SD, Ito MK, McGowan MP, Moriarty PM, Cromwell WC, Ross JL, Ziajka PE; National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Familial hypercholesterolemia: screening, diagnosis and management of pediatric and adult patients: clinical guidance from the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2011 Jun;5(3 Suppl):S1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Apr 12. — View Citation

Pinkosky SL, Newton RS, Day EA, Ford RJ, Lhotak S, Austin RC, Birch CM, Smith BK, Filippov S, Groot PHE, Steinberg GR, Lalwani ND. Liver-specific ATP-citrate lyase inhibition by bempedoic acid decreases LDL-C and attenuates atherosclerosis. Nat Commun. 2016 Nov 28;7:13457. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13457. — View Citation

Pollex RL, Joy TR, Hegele RA. Emerging antidyslipidemic drugs. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2008 Jun;13(2):363-81. doi: 10.1517/14728214.13.2.363 . Review. — View Citation

Sharrett AR, Ballantyne CM, Coady SA, Heiss G, Sorlie PD, Catellier D, Patsch W; Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study Group. Coronary heart disease prediction from lipoprotein cholesterol levels, triglycerides, lipoprotein(a), apolipoproteins A-I and B, and HDL density subfractions: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Circulation. 2001 Sep 4;104(10):1108-13. — View Citation

Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, Goldberg AC, Gordon D, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, McBride P, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC Jr, Watson K, Wilson PW, Eddleman KM, Jarrett NM, LaBresh K, Nevo L, Wnek J, Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Curtis LH, DeMets D, Hochman JS, Kovacs RJ, Ohman EM, Pressler SJ, Sellke FW, Shen WK, Smith SC Jr, Tomaselli GF; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S1-45. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a. Epub 2013 Nov 12. Erratum in: Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S46-8. Erratum in: Circulation. 2015 Dec 22;132(25):e396. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) TEAEs are defined as adverse events that began or worsened in severity after the first dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP) until 30 days after the last dose in the Open-Label Extension (OLE) Study. Up to Week 82
Secondary Percent Change From Parent Study Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: LDL-C value at Week 52/Week 78 minus Parent Study Baseline value divided by Parent Study Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values at screening and predose Day 1/Week 0 (Visit T1) in the Parent Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 78
Secondary Mean Change From Parent Study Baseline in LDL-C at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as: Mean LDL-C value at Week 52/Week 78 minus Mean Parent Study Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values at screening and predose Day 1/Week 0 (Visit T1) in the Parent Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 78
Secondary Percent Change From Parent Study Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: non-HDL-C value at Week 52/Week 78 minus Parent Study Baseline value divided by Parent Study Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values at screening and predose Day 1/Week 0 (Visit T1) in the Parent Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 72
Secondary Percent Change From Parent Study Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: Total cholesterol value at Week 52/Week 78 minus Parent Study Baseline value divided by Parent Study Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values at screening and predose Day 1/Week 0 (Visit T1) in the Parent Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 78
Secondary Percent Change From Parent Study Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: ApoB value at Week 52/Week 78 minus Parent Study Baseline value divided by Parent Study Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values at screening and predose Day 1/Week 0 (Visit T1) in the Parent Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 78
Secondary Percent Change From Parent Study Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: hs-CRP value at Week 52/Week 78 minus Parent Study Baseline value divided by Parent Study Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values at screening and predose Day 1/Week 0 (Visit T1) in the Parent Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 78
Secondary Percent Change From Parent Study Baseline in Triglycerides at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: Triglycerides value at Week 52/Week 78 minus Parent Study Baseline value divided by Parent Study Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values at screening and predose Day 1/Week 0 (Visit T1) in the Parent Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 78
Secondary Percent Change From Parent Study Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: HDL-C value at Week 52/Week 78 minus Parent Study Baseline value divided by Parent Study Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values at screening and predose Day 1/Week 0 (Visit T1) in the Parent Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 78
Secondary Percent Change From Open-Label Extension (OLE) Study Baseline in LDL-C at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: LDL-C value at Week 52/Week 78 minus OLE Study Baseline value divided by Parent Study Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing record prior to treatment start in the OLE Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 78
Secondary Mean Change From OLE Baseline in LDL-C at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as: Mean LDL-C value at Week 52/Week 78 minus Mean OLE Study Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing record prior to treatment start in the OLE Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 72
Secondary Percent Change From OLE Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: non-HDL-C value at Week 52/Week 78 minus OLE Study Baseline value divided by OLE Study Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing record prior to treatment start in the OLE Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 78
Secondary Percent Change From OLE Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: Total Cholesterol value at Week 52/Week 78 minus OLE Study Baseline value divided by OLE Study Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing record prior to treatment start in the OLE Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 78
Secondary Percent Change From OLE Baseline ApoB at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: ApoB value at Week 52/Week 78 minus OLE Study Baseline value divided by OLE Study Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing record prior to treatment start in the OLE Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 78
Secondary Percent Change From OLE Baseline in Hs-CRP at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: hs-CRP value at Week 52/Week 78 minus OLE Study Baseline value divided by OLE Study Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing record prior to treatment start in the OLE Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 78
Secondary Percent Change From OLE Baseline in Triglycerides at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: Triglycerides value at Week 52/Week 78 minus OLE Study Baseline value divided by OLE Study Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing record prior to treatment start in the OLE Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 78
Secondary Percent Change From OLE Baseline in HDL-C at Weeks 52 and 78 Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: HDL-C value at Week 52/Week 78 minus OLE Study Baseline value divided by OLE Study Baseline value multiplied by 100. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing record prior to treatment start in the OLE Study. Baseline; Week 52 and Week 78
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04998695 - Health Effects of Consuming Olive Pomace Oil N/A
Recruiting NCT03947866 - Ezetimibe-Rosuvastatin Evaluation Study
Completed NCT01709513 - Study of Alirocumab (REGN727/SAR236553) in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and Moderate, High, or Very High Cardiovascular (CV) Risk, Who Are Intolerant to Statins (ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE) Phase 3
Completed NCT01212900 - Randomized Trial of Imaging Versus Risk Factor-Based Therapy for Plaque Regression Phase 4
Completed NCT00001154 - Lipoprotein Metabolism in Normal Volunteers and Patients With High Levels of Lipoproteins
Completed NCT02550288 - A Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of MK-0653C in Japanese Participants With Hypercholesterolemia (MK-0653C-383) Phase 3
Completed NCT03929198 - Translation of Pritikin Program to the Community N/A
Completed NCT04485793 - Effect of a Dietary Supplement on Lipid Pattern and Liver Parameters in Hypercholesterolemia N/A
Completed NCT02341924 - Validating the "Foods for Health" Portfolio of Functional Food Products N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02223793 - Vascular Lifestyle-Intervention and Screening in Pharmacy N/A
Completed NCT01941836 - Evaluation of ETC-1002, Ezetimibe, and the Combination in Hypercholesterolemic Patients Phase 2
Completed NCT01934608 - The Effect of Synching Prescription Refills on Adherence N/A
Recruiting NCT01705873 - Analysis on the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in HIV- Infected Subjects Treated With LPV/r Based HAART Regimen vs. an EFV Based Regimen N/A
Completed NCT01670734 - Pharmacokinetic and Tolerability of Alirocumab SAR236553 (REGN727) in Patients With Hepatic Impairment and in Healthy Subjects Phase 1
Completed NCT01678521 - Effect of LDL-apheresis on PTX3 Plasma Levels in Hypercholesterolemic Patients N/A
Completed NCT01370590 - A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Ezetimibe/Atorvastatin 10 mg/20 mg Combination Tablet Compared to Marketed Ezetimibe 10 mg and Atorvastatin 20 mg Tablets in Participants With High Cholesterol (MK-0653C-185 AM1) Phase 3
Completed NCT01370603 - A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Ezetimibe/Atorvastatin 10 mg/40 mg Combination Tablet Compared to Marketed Ezetimibe 10 mg and Atorvastatin 40 mg Tablets in Participants With High Cholesterol (MK-0653C-190 AM1) Phase 3
Completed NCT01446679 - Special Drug Use-Results Survey of Lipitor Tablets N/A
Completed NCT01575171 - Using Nudges to Implement Comparative Effectiveness N/A
Completed NCT01768403 - Centralised Pan-Algerian Survey on the Undertreatment of Hypercholesterolemia N/A