A Pragmatic Trial of An Adaptive eHealth HIV Prevention Program for Diverse Adolescent MSM

Hiv Clinical Trial

— SMART  

Official title:

A Pragmatic Trial of An Adaptive eHealth HIV Prevention Program for Diverse Adolescent MSM

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03511131
• Other study ID #: 5U01MD011281
• Secondary ID: 5U01MD011281
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: April 18, 2018
• Est. completion date: December 12, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: August 2022
• Source: Northwestern University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This pragmatic trial of an HIV prevention program focuses on HIV risk-reduction in men who have sex with men (MSM) ages 13-18. The design is a three-tiered, internet-based HIV prevention intervention series that uses a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) to track adolescent MSM reporting varying degree of sexual risk.The program package includes: (1-low risk) a universally-delivered, brief, online sexual health education program designed for sexual and gender minority youth regardless of whether they are sexually active (Queer Sex Ed); (2-middle risk) a more intensive online intervention designed for diverse AMSM engaging in HIV transmission risk behaviors (Keep It Up!), and (3-high risk) the most intensive is a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention that will be delivered by MI therapists via online videochat (Young Men's Health Project).

Description:

Adolescent (ages 13-18) men who have sex with men (AMSM) experience a dramatic health disparity as they represent 2% of young people but account for almost 80% of HIV diagnoses in youth. Despite this disproportionate burden, current evidence-based HIV prevention programs focus primarily on adults and heterosexual youth. Because issues affecting sexual health decisions among AMSM are unique, interventions need to be designed to ensure appropriate content that resonates with AMSM. Prevention programs must also be responsive to minority AMSM that experience disparities in incidence or lack of access to prevention services. For example, Hispanics represent 27% of HIV infections among MSM, but Spanish speaking MSM face significant language barriers to accessing HIV services. Implementation issues are particularly critical as traditional HIV prevention delivery channels have significant limitations for AMSM: few adolescents attend LGBT youth oriented programs, schools place many restrictions on discussions of MSM sexual health, and major questions remain as to the feasibility of enrolling parents of AMSM into HIV prevention programs. With 92% of adolescents (across all races and income levels) going online every day, eHealth interventions represent a critical modality for delivering AMSM- specific intervention material where youth "are." Combining online recruitment with intervention delivery across a range of devices can overcome many access barriers to engagement of AMSM in HIV prevention. Unfortunately, there will be no single magic solution that will work for all AMSM and public health programmers should not continue to deliver the same fixed intervention when a participant is not responding. Alternatively, stepped-care strategies increase in intensity to meet the needs of those who do not respond to a less intense intervention. Using a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) design, the investigators will evaluate the impact of a package of increasingly intensive interventions that have already shown evidence of efficacy with diverse adolescent and young adult MSM. The SMART methodology is an ideal approach because SMART designs mimic treatment decisions as they are made in real-world clinical settings, components of traditional RCTs are embedded within the design, and participant data can be used post-hoc to inform decision rules in order to optimize implementation. Collectively the investigators brand this package of eHealth interventions as the SMART Program (Sexual Minority Adolescent Risk Taking). The SMART Program package includes: (1) a universally-delivered, brief, online sexual health education program designed for sexual and gender minority youth regardless of whether they are sexually active ("Queer Sex Ed") (2) a more intensive online intervention designed for diverse AMSM engaging in HIV transmission risk behaviors ("Keep It Up!"); and (3) a more intensive motivational interviewing (MI) intervention that will be delivered by MI therapists via online videochat ("Young Men's Health Project"). The investigators will evaluate the impact of the SMART Program and carefully document implementation context to inform scale out with the following aims: Aim 1: Evaluate the impact of the SMART Program and its constituent components at reducing HIV risk among AMSM. To do this, the investigators will: 1. Involve diverse AMSM (e.g., Youth Advisory Council) in developmentally adapting existing SMART Program components for AMSM ages 13-18 using the ADAPT-ITT framework. 2. Culturally and linguistically adapt the SMART Program for Spanish speaking Latino AMSM in the US. 3. Embed the SMART Program content into an eHealth platform that will allow access on a range of devices and accommodate updates. Perform alpha and beta testing. 4. Enroll a national sample of 1,938 AMSM who are diverse in terms of race/ethnicity, age, geographic region, socioeconomic status, and sexual experience history. 5. Test the effectiveness of the SMART Program at reducing HIV risk taking behaviors, increasing HIV testing, and improving prevention intentions. Consistent with a SMART design, the investigators operationalize and power the primary test of effectiveness as the first point of randomization, which tests the effectiveness of "Keep It Up!". Additional comparisons will allow the investigators to establish the response rate for "Queer Sex Ed", examine whether the more intensive "Young Men's Health Project" outperforms the less intensive "Keep It Up!" among non-responders to "Queer Sex Ed," and determine whether "Young Men's Health Project" provides added benefit to AMSM who did not respond to "Keep it Up!". Aim 2: Test if the SMART Program has differential efficacy across important sub-groups of AMSM. Consistent with the RFA, the investigators will test intervention effects within each of the NIH designated health disparity populations (racial/ethnicity minorities, rural, low SES), and by age and language (Spanish). Aim 3: Evaluate the delivery of the SMART Program nationally to inform scale out and determine cost-effectiveness. To reduce the science-practice gap, the investigators will utilize mixed methods to identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the SMART Program using a Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation trial design. The investigators will assess process metrics and indicators of its acceptability among AMSM and key national stakeholders, scale out feasibility, sustainability potential, and conduct a cost analysis to estimate the cost of program implementation compare to monetized benefits.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 1306
• Est. completion date: December 12, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: December 12, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Male
• Age group: 13 Years to 18 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• identifying as male-assigned at birth
• reporting attraction to men;
• 13-18 years old
• self-reported HIV-negative at the beginning of the study (or have never been HIV tested/do not know their HIV status)
• able to read English or Spanish,
• has a usable e-mail address, textable phone number, and access to the internet or smart-phone/-device

Exclusion Criteria:

• identifying as female-assigned at birth
• reporting no attraction men
• identifying as under 13 years of age
• identifying as 19 years old or older
• self-reported HIV-positive
• unable to read English or Spanish
• unable to have access to or use email, text messaging, voice calling
• unable to have access to the internet or a smart-phone/-device

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Adolescent Behavior
• Hiv
• Sex, Safe

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Queer Sex Ed
Comprehensive sexual health education program condition (Informational)
• Keep It Up
Culturally/situation-relevant HIV-prevention experimental condition (Motivational/behavioral)
• Keep It Up-Control
HIV knowledge control condition, attention-matched to KIU (Informational)
• Young Men's Health Project
Motivational enhancement video interviewing condition (Motivational/behavioral)

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Northwestern University	Chicago	Illinois

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Northwestern University	National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	PrEP Knowledge/Experience	The Knowledge of and Experience with Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) scale (for adolescents) will be used. This is a validated scale that asks questions such as: (Agree/Disagree) "Taking pre-exposure prophylaxis (a pill, also known as PrEP or Truvada) regularly can reduce the risk of contracting HIV from an HIV-positive sex partner."	Months: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12
Primary	Condomless anal sex	Changes in condomless anal sex acts from baseline to 12-months.	12-months
Primary	Condom Use Intentions Scale	This is a multi-item scale which asks participants about their plans and abilities to use condoms in the future. It has two subscales. The first subscale (Condom Use) asks about participants' likelihood to use condoms with partners. An example item for Condom Use is: "How likely is it that you will use a condom every time you have sex?" The 11-items for this subscale are measured from very unlikely (1) to very likely (4) [averaged min value 1, averaged max value 4]. High values mean a better outcome, or likely condom use with partners. The second subscale (Self-Efficacy) asks participants' ability to use condoms. An example item for Self-Efficacy is: "How confident are you that you would be able to be sure you had condoms with you?" The 5-items for this subscale are measured from not at all confident (1) to extremely confident (7) [averaged min value 1, averaged max value 7]. High values mean a better outcome, or more confidence at using condoms. The two subscales are not combined.	12-months
Primary	HIV Testing	Participants are asked to self-reported their history of actual getting HIV tested.	12-months
Secondary	HIV Knowledge	The brief HIV/AIDS Knowledge questionnaire assesses knowledge of transmission and prevention of HIV. Example items that are dichotomously measured as true/false, include: "A person can get HIV by sharing a glass of water with someone who has HIV," "There is a vaccine that can stop people (or adults) from getting HIV," "Using a latex condom or rubber can lower a person's chance of getting HIV," etc.	Months: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12
Secondary	HIV/AIDS Motivation and Behavioral Skills	Motivation (e.g. perceived threat of HIV/STI infection, motivation to become safer), social norms (e.g., partners/friends/family members opinions about condom use), and behavioral skills (e.g., negotiating condom use) will be assessed. An example of motivation-based measures would be: "True or False: You really only need to use condoms during one night stands." An example of social norm-based measures would be: "How likely/unlikely is it that you will have sex without a condom because you are afraid of what a partner might do to you if you ask to use condoms?" An example of skills-based measures would be: "How hard would it be for you to discuss safer sex with a partner in a non-sexual setting, such as while riding in your car?" More specific behavioral skills are also measured within the The Health Protective Communication Scale. An example of this would be, "In the past 12 months, have you asked a new sex partner about the number of past sex partners (he/she) had?"	Months: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12
Secondary	Condom Errors	An adaptation of the Condom Errors Questionnaire will be asked, which has been found to be predictive of condom breakage and slippage, and STI contraction. An example item from this questionnaire is: "When you used condoms during the LAST 6 MONTHS, how often was the condom package checked for visible damage before having sex?"	Months: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12