Effectiveness of a Mobile-based HIV Prevention Intervention Involving Incentive Policy for Doctors in Liangshan, China

HIV/AIDS Clinical Trial

Official title:

Effectiveness of a Mobile-based HIV Prevention Intervention for Rural and Low-income Population Involving Incentive Policy for Doctors in Liangshan, China: a Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05015062
• Other study ID #: 71833001
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 2023
• Est. completion date: December 2025

Study information

• Verified date: June 2022
• Source: Peking University
• Contact: Guoen Liu
• Phone: 13901359157
• Email: gordonliu[@]nsd.pku.edu.cn
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will be carried out in Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan province, China, using a single-blinded randomized controlled trial design to measure the effects of a mobile-based HIV-related information intervention on group HIV/AIDS prevention. Village doctors will be responsible for sending the HIV-related health education information to the participants. The aim of this study is to develop a generalizable, effective, acceptable, and convenient mobile-based information intervention model to improve HIV-related knowledge, attitudes, practices, and health outcomes in poverty-stricken areas in China and measure the impact of incentive policies on the work of village doctors in Liangshan, China.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 4000
• Est. completion date: December 2025
• Est. primary completion date: December 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• aged 18 years or older
• has mobile phone with internet service
• has and use WeChat and TikTok account regularly
• willing to provide informed consent
• speak Mandarin Chinese or Yi ethnic group's language

Exclusion Criteria:

• diagnosed with psychiatric disorders
• diagnosed with severe cognitive impairment
• diagnosed with severe physical disabilities
• has already attended or is currently attending another intervention program
• plan on moving out of Liangshan in the 18-month study period

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
• HIV Infections
• HIV/AIDS

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Mobile-based HIV-related educational message delivery
HIV/AIDS awareness-raising and behavior-related cyclic messages will be delivered by the village doctors on a biweekly basis for 18 months.
• Incentive policies evaluation
village doctors in Intervention A and B will receive different types of monetary compensation. Doctors in Intervention A will receive standardized compensation for completing their assigned tasks. Doctors in Intervention B will receive performance-based compensation whose amount depends on how well the participants perform on the follow-up questionnaires.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Peking University

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	HIV-related knowledge improvement	Result will be obtained by calculating weighted scores for the indicators in the HIV Knowledge Questionnaire 18 (HIV-KQ-18) to represent the participants' and their family members' level of knowledge measured by the baseline and follow-up questionnaires. The HIV-KQ-18 is a self-administered 18-item questionnaire; the possible scores range from 0 to 18, with 0-9 representing low HIV-related knowledge and 10-18 representing high HIV-related knowledge.	18 months
Primary	Comparison of the effectiveness of different financial compensations	The research team will compare the two interventions to determine what type of financial reward, standardized compensation or participant performance-based compensation, is more effective at incentivizing village doctors to deliver and promote the intervention content.	18 months
Secondary	Effectiveness of secondary knowledge transmission: HIV-related knowledge improvement of the participants' family members	The research team will examine the path of secondary knowledge transmission to the participants' family members by having the family members complete the HIV Knowledge Questionnaire 18 (HIV-KQ-18). The HIV-KQ-18 is a self-administered 18-item questionnaire; the possible scores range from 0 to 18, with 0-9 representing low HIV-related knowledge and 10-18 representing high HIV-related knowledge.	18 months
Secondary	Behavioral changes: condom use	Assess the changes in participants' condom use via the Condoms Use Self-Efficacy Scale (CUSES), a 28-item self-reporting questionnaire using a 5-point scale scoring system in which 0 represents strongly disagree and 4 represents strongly agree.	18 months
Secondary	Behavioral changes: substance use	Assess the severity, frequency and change of participants' substance use via the Drug and Abuse Screening Test (DAST), a 10-item questionnaire with scores range from 0 to 10; 0-2 representing low substance use and 9-10 representing severe substance use.	18 months
Secondary	Health outcomes: HIV prevalence	Will be collecting regional data on HIV prevalence through collaboration with local departments.	18 months
Secondary	Health outcomes: mental health	Assessed via the use of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) patient questionnaire, a self-reporting questionnaire consisting of 26 yes/no questions about the presence of various symptoms of different mental disorders.	18 months
Secondary	Health outcomes: all-cause mortality	Will be collecting regional data on all-cause mortality through collaboration with local departments.	18 months
Secondary	Social factors: quality of life	Measured via the use of EQ-5D-3L, a questionnaire comprised of 5 questions and a visual analogue scale to assess the participants' health-related quality of life. Each question has three possible answers corresponding to three levels of perceived problems. Level 1 indicates no problem and level 3 indicates extreme problems. The visual analogue scale is numbered from 0 to 100, with 0 representing "the worst health you can imagine" and 100 representing "the best health you can imagine"	18 months
Secondary	Social factors: stigma towards HIV	Assessed via the use of the Internalized AIDS-Related Stigma Scale, a 6-item scale that offers a binary (yes/no) response to every item and the scores is computed as the sums of the items with 6 representing high stigmatization and 0 representing low stigmatization.	18 months
Secondary	Social factors: perception of social support	Assess participants' social support in the community via the use of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SS), a self-reporting 19-item survey. The mean score of the 19 items will be calculated and transferred onto a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating more support.	18 months
Secondary	Retention of HIV-related knowledge	Measured by the HIV Knowledge Questionnaire 18 (HIV-KQ-18). The research team will ask all participants to complete the questionnaire every six months after the intervention period and compare their new scores with their previous score to examine their ability to recall information from the educational modules. The HIV-KQ-18 is a self-administered 18-item questionnaire; the possible scores range from 0 to 18, with 0-9 representing low HIV-related knowledge and 10-18 representing high HIV-related knowledge.	18 months
Secondary	Feasibility: participants' use of social media applications	Feasibility of the intervention will be calculated by dividing the number of people who can use WeChat and TikTok by the total number of people living in the area.	18 months
Secondary	Level of engagement	Measured by an original engagement and attendance scale. Participants will choose from a range 1 to 6, with 1 representing non-engaging and 6 representing highly engaging.	18 months
Secondary	Study's acceptability and satisfaction	Assessed via an original 15-item questionnaire with rating scales (6 is Highly Satisfied and 1 is Highly Unsatisfied). Participants will be asked to rate and provide feedback on the intervention's content and method, including the effectiveness of the HIV-related knowledge modules, the time and method of information delivery, village doctors' attitude and competence, the design of the entire experimental intervention process, and more.	18 months
Secondary	Cost-effectiveness of the intervention:	Data on the intervention's direct and indirect costs will be collected. Direct cost involves labor costs, research-related travel expenses, and village doctors' and participants' financial compensations. Indirect cost consists of the expenses on cell phone internet data. The date will then be used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of both interventions.	18 months