Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Inguinal hernia is one of the most common worldwide afflictions of men. The presence of an inguinal hernia is indication for its repair. Approximately 700,000 hernia repairs are performed in the U.S. each year, and this procedure accounts for 10% of all general surgery procedures in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) (10,000 inguinal herniorrhaphies performed per year). There are many different techniques currently in use for repairing inguinal hernias and with the advent of laparoscopy, yet another technique is being advocated. Laparoscopic repair has been reported in some studies to be superior to open repair because of less pain and earlier return to work. However, laparoscopic repair requires a general or regional anesthetic and expensive equipment and supplies to perform. There is also evidence that open tension-free mesh repair may have results similar to laparoscopic repair for these patient centered outcome measures. The general acceptance of this procedure, especially in the VHA, has not been uniform. Furthermore, no randomized trial of sufficient size and power to be conclusive has been done to set forth the operative "gold standard" for hernia repair.


Clinical Trial Description

Primary Hypothesis: Open tension-free herniorrhaphy when compared with laparoscopic herniorrhaphy will achieve equal or better recurrence rates and lower costs while achieving equivalent outcomes for patient-centered measures.

Secondary Hypotheses:

Intervention: Patients randomized to open repair will undergo a standardized tension-free herniorrhaphy with prosthesis (method of Lichtenstein). Patients randomized to laparoscopic herniorrhaphy will undergo a standardized preperitoneal repair with prosthesis, using either a transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach. During the implementation period of the trial, a preliminary laboratory session will be conducted with all site PIs to standardize herniorrhaphy techniques, reach consensus on all aspects of perioperative patient management (including postoperative patient instructions, follow-up schedules, definitions of recurrence and complications), and to ensure that the site PI is thoroughly familiar with the protocol.

Each site will be visited by one of two expert surgeons (the Study Chair or a Co-PI surgeon) to observe the operative procedures and ensure that participating surgeons adhere to the protocol in all respects. The first visit will take place in the first 6 months of the study and then as needed thereafter, based on routine examination of operative records randomly selected from each site (5 open and 5 laparoscopic herniorrhaphies, and, if appropriate, viewing of videotapes of the laparoscopic procedures).

Primary Outcomes: Hernia recurrence rate.

Study Abstract:

Background: Inguinal hernia is one of the most common worldwide afflictions of men. The presence of an inguinal hernia is indication for its repair. Approximately 700,000 hernia repairs are performed in the U.S. each year, and this procedure accounts for 10% of all general surgery procedures in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) (10,000 inguinal herniorrhaphies performed per year). There are many different techniques currently in use for repairing inguinal hernias and with the advent of laparoscopy, yet another technique is being advocated. Laparoscopic repair has been reported in some studies to be superior to open repair because of less pain and earlier return to work. However, laparoscopic repair requires a general or regional anesthetic and expensive equipment and supplies to perform. There is also evidence that open tension-free mesh repair may have results similar to laparoscopic repair for these patient centered outcome measures. The general acceptance of this procedure, especially in the VHA, has not been uniform. Furthermore, no randomized trial of sufficient size and power to be conclusive has been done to set forth the operative gold standard for hernia repair.

Objectives: To determine whether open tension-free herniorrhaphy when compared with laparoscopic herniorrhaphy can achieve equal or better recurrence rates and lower costs while achieving equivalent outcomes for patient-centered measures.

Methods: This multi-center VA cooperative study is enrolling 2200 men with inguinal hernia and randomizing them to one of two operative techniques: open tension-free (Lichtenstein) repair, or laparoscopic preperitoneal repair. The primary outcome measure is recurrence at two years. Secondary outcome measures are complications, pain, time to return to normal activities, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, caregiver burden, and cost. The role of comorbidity in the outcome will also be determined. The sample size will permit at least 80% power to detect a difference of 3% in 2-year recurrence rates between the two surgical procedures. Fourteen VAMCs are randomizing the 2200 patients over a 3-year accrual period. The study will also have a 2-year follow-up period. All patients will be followed to the end of the study so that follow-up will range from 2-5 years (average 3.5 years).

On November 29, 2001, the Hines Cooperative Studies Human Rights Committee and the Data and Safety Monitoring Board met to review the data from CSP #456. Both committees determined that there were sufficient data to complete the trial without enrolling any additional patients and recommended that enrollment be stopped. There were no safety concerns. Approximately 2,165 patients of a targeted 2,200 had been enrolled at this point. All sites were notified of this within 24 hours of the action.

Main Manuscript: ;


Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT00032448
Study type Interventional
Source VA Office of Research and Development
Contact
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
Start date October 1998
Completion date June 2004

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01629485 - Part vs Whole Task Mastery Training for Laparoscopic Hernia Repair N/A
Terminated NCT01305486 - A Study of Complex Ventral Hernia Repair Utilizing the XenMatrix™ Surgical Graft With Component Separation N/A
Completed NCT01205399 - A Retrospective Study With Prospective Follow-Up of Complex Ventral Hernia Repair Utilizing the AlloMax Surgical Graft N/A
Completed NCT01141335 - Polypropylene Mesh Versus Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Mesh in Inguinal Hernia Repair Phase 4
Completed NCT00905320 - Hernia Repair With or Without Sutures N/A
Completed NCT00617357 - Repair of Infected or Contaminated Hernias N/A
Completed NCT00535990 - Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Database for the Purpose of Research
Withdrawn NCT00138957 - Study of a New Laparoscopic Technique for Parastomal Hernia Repair With Mesh N/A
Completed NCT06034652 - T-GENVIH-003 LTFU (Long Term Follow Up) Study
Completed NCT06389331 - Study on Effects of Defect Closure in Laparoscopic Repair of Direct Inguinal Hernia
Completed NCT04119466 - Stabilizing Training in Degenerative Disc Disease N/A
Completed NCT00622583 - International Hernia Mesh Registry
Completed NCT04137172 - Short Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh With Facial Repair(IPOM-plus) for Ventral Hernia. N/A
Completed NCT01132209 - Suture Techniques to Reduce the Incidence of The inCisional Hernia N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05061589 - Incidence and Risk Factors of Parastomal Hernia in Patients With Permanent Colostomy in China
Active, not recruiting NCT02439060 - PUBMIC (Prophylactic Use of Biologic Mesh in Ileal Conduit) N/A
Completed NCT02238964 - Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT01727388 - Informativeness to Digital Rectal Examination Phase 3
Completed NCT01997619 - Biological Mesh Repair of Complex Hernias in High Risk Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT00544583 - Continuous Versus Interrupted Abdominal Wall Closure After Emergency Midline Laparotomy Phase 2/Phase 3