Clinical Trials Logo

Hernia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Hernia.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03904888 Recruiting - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

Start date: September 23, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Evaluate the early postoperative course of patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with either a conventional or a robot assisted approach and with or without the injection of the trocar wounds with a local anesthetic.

NCT ID: NCT03899012 Completed - Incisional Hernia Clinical Trials

Audit of the EVEREG Incisional Hernia Registry (AUDHIT)

AUDHIT
Start date: March 1, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Objective: The objective of the study is to verify and validate the data collected in the EVEREG Incisional Hernia Surgery Registry between 2012 and 2018 through an audit process. Methods: An audit of registered cases (Incisional Hernia Patients undergoing surgery) from 2012 to 2018, and a descriptive analysis of these data will be performed Expected results: The study could show that the EVEREG Incisional Hernia Registry is a reliable source of information, valid for carrying out specific and exhaustive analysis that may lead to high quality publications. Relevance: The standardization of the data collection is very important to compare outcomes between different centers. This study will allow us to verify the accuracy of the collected data

NCT ID: NCT03894943 Completed - Clinical trials for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Quantitative Sensory Testing and PET/CT Scanning in Assessment of Surgical Outcome for Lumbar Disc Herniation

PET-Pain
Start date: June 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Patients with lumbar disc herniation suffer from pain and morbidity. Surgical intervention can be a quick and effective relief, however some individuals experience less favorable outcome. This study tries to investigate and test the differences in pain perception and pain modulation between individuals. Using PET/CT scans the investigators try to visualize pain perception and -modulation in the CNS. This is subsequently correlated with a battery of pain tests and the surgical outcome of disc herniation surgery.

NCT ID: NCT03860285 Suspended - Quality of Life Clinical Trials

Objective and Perceived Quality Study in Patients Undergoing Elective Groin Hernia Surgery

Start date: March 1, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

This is a prospective non-comparative observational study of cohorts. Consists on offering surveys to every patient undergoing groin hernia surgery in our Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit, in Hospital of Navarra.

NCT ID: NCT03858556 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Effect of Chuna Manipulation Therapy on Gait in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation

Start date: February 27, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Prospective Observation Study of the Effect of Chuna Manipulation Therapy on Gait in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation

NCT ID: NCT03856710 Recruiting - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Self Fixating Versus Stapled Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

Start date: September 22, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Inguinal (groin) hernias are common and occur when an internal part of the body pushes through a weakness in the surrounding tissue wall of the groin. They are more likely to occur in men and affect people's quality of life by causing pain that is worse after any strenuous activity. If untreated they can cause serious problems such as strangulation when too much bowel comes through the weakness and becomes squeezed with the risk of losing blood supply requiring emergency surgery. To prevent such complications, elective surgery for symptomatic inguinal hernias is undertaken either in the conventional open method which involves a cut in the groin, or the keyhole surgery, when the surgery is undertaken via three small incisions in the abdomen (instead of a single, larger groin incision), a thin tube containing a light source and a camera (laparoscope) is inserted through one of these incisions, so the surgeon can see inside the abdomen. Special surgical instruments are inserted through the other incisions, so the surgeon can pull or push the hernia back into place and a piece of mesh is then stapled or glued to secure it to the weakened area in the abdomen wall. Securing the mesh with staple has been associated with increased post-operative pain and analgesia requirement; whereas not doing so has been thought to increase the chances of recurrence- more so in large sized weakness. A newer mesh appears to offer benefit over conventional meshes as it grips the tissues around the weakness without requiring staples or glue to fix it in place, and has shown to cause lesser post-operative pain and recurrence. This study is going to compare the newer self-gripping mesh with the conventional mesh requiring fixation to see which is best for patients undergoing keyhole repair to fix inguinal hernias.

NCT ID: NCT03854240 Completed - Clinical trials for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Classic And Lateral Approach Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block

Start date: November 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

US-guided peripheral nerve blocks have been used increasingly due to the advantages of ultrasound in anesthesia practice. TLIP block is one of these nerve blocks performed under US guidance. In this technique, local anesthetic solution is injected between the multifidus and longissimus muscles nearly at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra and targets the dorsal rami of the thoracolumbar nerves. However, the visualisation of this technique may be difficult under ultrasound (US) guidance. Therefore, Ahiskalioglu et al. defined modified lateral technique of TLIP block as a new approach. The aim of this study is to compare US-guided classic and modified (lateral) techniques of TLIP block for postoperative analgesia management after lumbar laminectomy surgery .

NCT ID: NCT03846661 Completed - Clinical trials for Postoperative Complications

Nationwide Long-term Outcome Surveillance of Physiomesh® vs. Other Meshes in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair

Start date: January 1, 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary aim of the present study was to show how a national clinical register combined with other nationwide administrative registers may serve as a tool for pre- and post-marketing evaluation of new mesh and mesh fixation products for hernia surgery, using Physiomesh® versus other meshes designed for laparoscopic hernia repair as an example.

NCT ID: NCT03842852 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Laparoscopic TEP (Total Extra-peritoneal) Repair Vs Open PHS (Prolene Hernia System)

Start date: January 1, 2003
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Abdominal wall hernias are common, with a lifetime risk of 27% in men and 3% in women. Inguinal and femoral hernias are the most common affections faced by primary care physicians that require surgical intervention. The most common hernia in both sexes is the indirect inguinal hernia. The male-to-female ratio is 9:1 for inguinal hernias and 1:3 for femoral hernias. Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations undertaken in routine surgical practice. Since the introduction of the Bassini method in 1887, more than 70 types of pure tissue repair have been reported in the surgical literature. Throughout the years, attention was paid to the recurrences that occur after the use of tissue approximation technique, in the literature it has been reported that they occur in up to 34% of cases, being that the actual incidence of recurrences it is underreported, therefore, the repair of the hernia with approximation of tissue has practically been abandoned. The concept of tension free repair for hernias was introduced by Lichtenstein who explain that the prime etiologic factor behind most herniorrhaphy failures is the suturing together, under tension, of structures that are not normally in apposition. The technique of the hernioplasty with the use of mesh was not widely accepted at first, the expansion of the use of mesh expanded for years. The use of mesh increased from 7 per cent of all operations in 1992 to 51 per cent in 1996. Currently, groin hernia treatment is not standardized but, today, tension free mesh repair technique is regarded as gold standard. Based in the Stoppa technique, the laparoscopic hernia repair was developed in 1991. The most common laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair are transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair and total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. The use of the laparoscopic technique was progressively increasing based on the advantages of minimal invasive procedures, but since the publication of Neumayer in 2004, where he reports a recurrent incidence in laparoscopic hernia of 10.1 % compared with 4% for open surgery, the use of laparoscopic repair declines considerably. Surgeons remain divided on the best technique for inguinal hernia repair: while more than half never perform laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, today the laparoscopic technique for hernia repair is used in 28% of cases, of which 25% is used the TEP approach and is considered the best approach for bilateral inguinal hernia repair (17). Advantages and disadvantages of TEP are: faster return to usual activities, operation times are longer and there appears to be a higher risk of serious complication rate in respect of visceral (especially bladder) and vascular injuries (18). In 1999, Gilbert published the use of bilayer patch device, known as prolene ® hernia system (Ethicon; Somerville, NJ, USA) (PHS) to repair inguinal hernia. The unique feature of this polypropylene mesh device is that it has attached the component, its underlay patch provides a pre-peritoneal repair, a connector that has the desirable attributes of a plug and an onlay patch covers the back wall. In the literature, better results have been reported for PHS repair than for Lichtenstein repair. The advantages of the anterior repair of inguinal hernias are: low operative costs, short learning curve, reproducible results at all levels and the possibility of the use of local anesthesia. The objective of this study is to compare the results of laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal repair (LTEPR) with open prolene hernia system repair (OPHSR) retrospectively.

NCT ID: NCT03835351 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Urinary Retention After Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Comparing the Use of the Intraoperative Urinary Catheter

Start date: March 7, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This will be a randomized controlled study which will compare the rate of post-operative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair between patients who receive an intra-operative urinary catheter and those who do not. The primary aim of the study is to determine if the use of intra-operative urinary catheter reduces the incidence of post-operative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Specific patient inclusion criteria include all patients aged 18 years or older presenting for an elective unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia repair, who are able to tolerate general anesthesia and are considered eligible to have a hernia repair through a laparoscopic approach.