View clinical trials related to Hernia.
Filter by:The rationale for fetal therapy in severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is to restore adequate lung growth for neonatal survival.
In this study, the investigators aimed to investigate the effect of hernia belt on postoperative complications and quality of life for patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Outcomes include hernia recurrence (patient-reported and clinical exam), postoperative complications within 3 months (seroma and hematoma development, wound infection, abdominal bloating and foreign body sensation), pain (visual analog scale,VAS), health-related quality of life (36-item short-form health survey, SF-36). Follow up by physical examination, ultrasonography and telephone.
The purpose of this study is to use a scale to learn more about the tension of the abdominal wall in hernia repairs without component separation. 1. What is the abdominal wall tension for hernias repaired without a component separation? 2. What patient factors contribute to greater abdominal wall tension? 3. Is there an association between abdominal wall tension before primary closure or bridging repair and patient outcomes? Participants will be asked to allow their surgeon to use a tension scale to measure the tension of the abdominal wall during surgery.
The main aim of this project is to elucidate the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia during stay in the Pediatric intensive care unit. (PICU). This patient group often presents with severe circulatory and respiratory dysfunction requiring intensive care treatment. Characterization of risk factors to AKI will also be performed.
The purpose of this study is to capture preliminary clinical safety and performance on the TAHRS
Background: Previous publications have highlighted limited data on patient outcomes and experiences at Shouldice Hospital. Existing studies from Europe reported outcomes following Shouldice repair but lacked recent data. The current project seeks to optimize patient care and knowledge through systematic follow-up. Study Objectives: Establish a patient-reported outcome measure follow-up program. Evaluate postoperative complication rates. Determine important outcomes to patients. Establish and monitor patient satisfaction with decision-making and hernia repair. Hypotheses/Research Questions: Several research questions related to patient motivations, outcomes, knowledge, and satisfaction are posed for investigation. Potential Risks and Benefits: No anticipated risks to participants. Participants won't directly benefit but contribute to improving patient care and knowledge. Study Design: The study employs a prospective follow-up approach. Surveys are sent at specific intervals (30-40 days, 1-year, 3-years, and 5-years) via email. Consent forms are included in the email, allowing participants to choose their level of involvement. Data is collected from survey responses, patient charts, and operative notes. Study Population: All patients aged 16-90 who underwent hernia surgery at Shouldice Hospital are eligible. Exclusion criteria: Lack of an email address. The required sample size is unknown, and this study serves as a pilot. Data Collection: Data is collected from surveys, patient charts, and operative notes. Consent is obtained through deferred consent (initial contact via email, with consent forms provided). Safeguards are in place to protect personal health information. Duration of Study: Estimated to take 5-6 years. Recruitment/enrollment: 6-12 months. Follow-up: 5 years from the last enrolled participant. Data analysis and write-up: 5 months. Overlap with Other Projects: Concerns about overlap with other studies are addressed, and concurrent participation is allowed. Participants can withdraw at any time. In summary, this research project aims to gather comprehensive data on hernia surgery outcomes, patient experiences, and satisfaction at Shouldice Hospital through a systematic follow-up approach, contributing to the improvement of patient care and knowledge in this field.
Radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion serves as a foundational curative treatment strategy for selected patients afflicted with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Parastomal hernia after this procedure is an underestimated and undertreated clinical entity, which heavily impairs patients' quality of life due to symptoms of pain, leakage, application or skin problems. There is little evidence about prophylactic mesh placement for parastomal hernia prevention. In this study we examine the use of meshes during radical cystectomy and compare them with a control group.
This is a randomized controlled study comparing non-pharmacological treatment to proactive pharmacological treatment for patient with non-acute lumbar disc herniation with moderate or higher levels of pain. The study involves 200 adult patients aged 19-69, with 50 patients from each participating hospital. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the non-pharmacological treatment group or the pharmacological treatment group 1:1 ratio. Specific interventions will be determined by doctors and Korean medicine doctors without predefined treatment strategies. The non-pharmacological treatment include acupuncture, electroacupuncture, spinal manual therapy and motion style acupuncture. The pharmacological treatment include medication prescription, injection, and nerve block. Treatment period is 8 weeks, and f/u for 3 years.
The goal of this clinical investigation is to learn about DISC Care, an Hernia Blocking System, in patients who have undergone lumbar disc hernia surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: - if the implant (DISC Care) prevents disc herniation recurrence - if DISC Care is a safe device Participants will be implanted with DISC Care and followed up for two years (7 visits).
This prospective randomized study will evaluate the effectiveness of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) versus endotracheal intubation (ETT) for patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia at CMH.