Clinical Trials Logo

Hernia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Hernia.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1 ·  Next »

NCT ID: NCT06410469 Completed - Cystocele Clinical Trials

A Novel Suturing Technique of Cystocele Treatment

cystosel
Start date: June 1, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The rug weaving-like plication technique may offer a viable alternative for cystocele repair without mesh, utilizing natural tissue.

NCT ID: NCT06409091 Completed - Hernia, Ventral Clinical Trials

Short Term Outcomes of Heavy-weight Versus Medium-weight Synthetic Mesh

Start date: January 1, 2012
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study compares short term outcomes of patients undergoing a hernia repair with heavy weight mesh vs medium weight mesh in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases.

NCT ID: NCT06397014 Completed - Hernia Repair Clinical Trials

The Clinical Applications of D-type Parastomal Hernia Repair Surgery

Start date: February 1, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

During the period from February 2018 to February 2022, a study was conducted on patients with parastomal hernia.There were 23 patients who underwent repair surgery for D-type colostomy hernia, while 68 patients underwent traditional laparoscopic repair surgery for hernia.The inclusion criteria were: (1) preoperative diagnosis of parastomal hernia by CT scan; (2) underwent laparoscopic repair surgery or combined laparoscopic repair with abdominal wall and stoma reconstruction surgery.The exclusion criteria were: (1) occurrence of tumor recurrence and/or new tumors during the follow-up period; (2) death or loss to follow-up during the follow-up period.

NCT ID: NCT06389331 Completed - Hernia Clinical Trials

Study on Effects of Defect Closure in Laparoscopic Repair of Direct Inguinal Hernia

Start date: September 1, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The defect closure was found to have higher pain and less seroma formation at various intervals of time following TEP for moderate-large direct inguinal hernia. Although these findings were statistically insignificant, they may be clinically significant, and further studies with a larger sample size are suggested.

NCT ID: NCT06389318 Completed - Clinical trials for Inguinal Hernia Repair

Buccal Midazolam Versus Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Plus Oral Chloral Hydrate in Inguinal Hernia Repair

Start date: March 26, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most common surgical procedures in early infancy. Preoperative anxiety remains a vexing issue, and it exists in nearly 50% of pediatric patients

NCT ID: NCT06380621 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Bilateral vs Unilateral Totally Extraperitoneal Repair Among Patients With Unilateral Inguinal Hernia

Start date: March 15, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the feasibility of bilateral laparoscopic exploration for all unilateral cases followed by laparoscopic bilateral TEP repair in all cases with a contralateral occult hernia and to compare complications, recurrence rates, postoperative pain, and operative duration with prospectively performed unilateral repairs in young to middle-aged patients presenting with unilateral hernias in the surgery outpatient department. The main questions it aims to answer are: - To compare complications, recurrence rates, postoperative pain, and operative duration between both groups. - Incidence of occult contralateral hernia Patients attending the OPD for unilateral inguinal hernia were counseled about the trial and fully encouraged to understand the difference between two procedures for unilateral hernia: bilateral exploration and bilateral TEP repair, upon which if a contralateral occult inguinal hernia was observed, documented, and controls were taken from the patients who denied bilateral exploration and underwent unilateral TEP repair. The allotment of patients was done in two groups of 30 patients each. Researchers will compare Group A( bilateral TEP) with Group B (unilateral TEP) to see if complications, recurrence rates, postoperative pain, and operative duration occur in each group

NCT ID: NCT06366581 Completed - Incisional Hernia Clinical Trials

Transcriptomic Analysis of Incisional Hernia Based on High-throughput Sequencing Technology

Start date: March 1, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study included patients who underwent surgical treatment for incisional hernia and non-hernia conditions. Surgical specimens were collected for transcriptome sequencing to obtain the gene expression list. Then genes analyzed by Gene Ontology, protein interactions, and signaling pathway enrichment using the expression matrix.

NCT ID: NCT06356987 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Comparison of Laparoscopic Herniotomy and Open Herniotomy in Children

Herniotomy
Start date: June 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

All patients of age 6 month to 12 years with inguinal hernia were included in study. Data was collected on detailed proforma regarding age, sex, side ,operative time, cosmesis , and postoperative complications

NCT ID: NCT06314815 Completed - Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trials

Ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric Nerve Block Prior to Shouldice Inguinal Hernia Repair

NBSS
Start date: January 11, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The introduction of ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve blocks into the preoperative care regimen at Shouldice Hospital for inguinal hernia repair marks a significant shift in pain management strategies. While Shouldice Hospital has traditionally not employed this technique, recent literature highlighting its potential benefits has prompted its trial within their patient population. Research in this area, although limited, suggests promising outcomes. Studies such as those by Beaussier et al. (2005) and Nehra et al. (1995) have demonstrated decreased postoperative pain and opioid use, as well as increased mobility associated with the use of ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve blocks. However, concerns such as orthostatic hypotension and rebound pain have also been noted, indicating the need for careful consideration and monitoring of potential adverse effects. More recent studies, particularly those focusing on the Lichtenstein repair, have further supported the potential benefits of ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve blocks. Kacmaz and Bolat (2020) found improved patient satisfaction, reduced opioid consumption, and shorter hospital stays associated with nerve block techniques. Additionally, the use of adjuncts such as dexamethasone has shown promise in reducing rebound pain and opioid requirements postoperatively. The purpose of evaluating the use of ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve blocks at Shouldice Hospital is multifaceted. Not only does it aim to enhance patient care and satisfaction by improving pain management strategies, but it also provides valuable insights for anesthetists and surgeons regarding the utility and efficacy of this technique within the context of inguinal hernia repair. Furthermore, the trial may facilitate the refinement of current practices, potentially leading to standardized protocols that optimize patient outcomes while minimizing adverse effects. In summary, the introduction of ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve blocks at Shouldice Hospital represents a proactive approach toward enhancing perioperative care for inguinal hernia patients. By leveraging emerging evidence and adapting to evolving clinical practices, the hospital stands to benefit from improved patient outcomes and potentially contribute to the advancement of pain management strategies in hernia surgery.

NCT ID: NCT06240858 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in TAPP Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair

Start date: March 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The goal of this prospective study is to compare the clinical efficacy of self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hernia repair, in order to improve the outcome of inguinal hernia treatment. The main question it aims to answer is, in which procedure is the self-gripping mesh more effective. Participants will be divided into the TAPP group and the Lichtenstein group by random number table method, the TAPP group underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal preperitoneal hernia repair, and the Lichtenstein group underwent Lichtenstein hernia repair, both groups used self-gripping meshes. Researchers will compare the operation time, postoperative time out of bed, postoperative hospital stay, hospital costs and postoperative complications between the two groups to see the clinical efficacy of self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus Lichtenstein hernia repair.