View clinical trials related to Head and Neck Neoplasms.
Filter by:There is no evidence available about which molecular profiling methods are currently used for cancer patients in Austrian clinical practice. The construction of the registry proposed as a completely independent research endeavor, will be helpful for scientific evaluation and the establishment of highly credible data.
Fluorescent technology continues to advance in the detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Currently, this requires switching from near-infrared light to white light to be able to identify the fluorescent tissue contrasting with normal surrounding tissue. Currently, no system has been studied specifically for head and neck sentinel lymph node biopsies using a hands free goggle system that can visualize white light (normal surgical visualization) and nearinfrared light (ICG fluorescence) simultaneously. This technology may have implications on the safety and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy for head and neck mucosal and cutaneous tumors. Secondarily, this may reduce operative costs by decreasing the amount of time required to perform the SLNB procedure. Regarding parathyroid identification, this technology has the potential to identify these very small glands during procedures they are at risk. These glands are not only at risk of inadvertent removal if not adequately identified, but may also be at risk if devascularized by manipulation during the surgical procedure. Therefore, early and accurate identification may decrease the rate of temporary and permanent hypoparathyroidism and hypocalcemia. This is not only an issue during thyroid and parathyroid surgery, but during laryngectomy surgery where the anatomic region these glands are located are often resected to remove at risk lymph nodes from cancer spread. Therefore, identifying these glands may help preserve parathyroid function in this patient population as well.
The main idea behind MICRO-LEARNER is to provide new insights about the response of healthy tissues to radiation by using information from the micro-environment obtained by biological measurements and imaging. This new knowledge will be included in current available predictive models of radio-induced toxicity, thus allowing to add unique biological characteristics of patients to dosimetry and treatment/clinical related variables. MICRO-LEARNER focuses on prostate cancer (PCa) and head-and-neck cancer (HNCa). For both cancers, radiotherapy is effectively used as curative treatment, in single modality or within a multidisciplinary approach including surgery (PCa) and/or chemotherapy (HNCa). Prediction and reduction of radio-induced side effects are becoming a priority: for PCa, high survival rates should be accompanied by a very low rate of moderate/severe toxicities; for HNCa, there is the need to tailor radiation dose according to disease recurrence risk profile. The shared aim of both cancers is to balance the improvement in outcome with a well-tolerated toxicity profile. Recent research indicates that the intestinal/salivary bacteria are strongly suspected of being very important in mediating the response to inflammation and lesions. Although their balance deeply changes during radiotherapy, studies done so far in the field of the microbiota-host relationship in radiotherapy have not addressed their role in insurgence of radiation toxicity. In this study, the investigators will assess how microbial populations evolve and how this influences the host and radiation induced toxicity in a significant number of patients. Moreover, the individual response at the tissue microstructure level, through analysis of images with advanced bioengineering techniques, will be determined. Results from this research, besides suggesting new ways to predict patients at risk of relevant side-effects, may also suggest possible treatments to change the baseline microbiota of patients at high risk or to modify it during therapy, in order to mitigate toxicity. Understanding the microbiota-radiotherapy interaction may thus lead to novel, effective and inexpensive ways of assessing and managing complications of cancer treatment.
Open, multicenter, single arm, phase II, biomarker driven umbrella trial for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
This study shed light on an under-researched area by examining the prognostic associations of pre-treatment QoL with overall survival and distant metastasis free survival among patients with head and neck cancer who underwent free flap reconstruction. In addition, a validated instrument specific to head and neck cancer, i.e. the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QoL) was adopted.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate this new technology available at the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center in the setting of head and neck cancer radiation treatment planning. This study will also provide preliminary data critical to the development of multi-parametric, multi-modality quantitative imaging biomarkers and data analysis models for prediction of outcome in both tumors and normal tissue, which are essential for patient-specific adaptive therapy. All participants will undergo a diagnostic PET/CT and a Radiation Treatment Planning CT per SOC procedures. In addition, all participants will undergo an additional imaging set consisting of a PET/MRI. It is anticipated that most patients will undergo the PET/MRI on the same day as their PET/CT negating the need for a second injection of the FDG radioisotope used for SOC PET imaging. All patients will receive gadolinium contrast per SOC dosing guidelines for the MRI portion of the PET/MRI. Both SOC MMRI pulse sequences and investigational sequences will be utilized in this study.
The primary study objective is to determine if microdoses of ABY-029 (up to 6X) lead to detectable signals (defined as signal-to-noise ratio, SNR ≥10, with wide-field iFI) in sampled tissues with an EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) pathology score ≥ 1 based on histological staining. The secondary study objective is to assess ex vivo the specificity of tumor binding in resected specimens by measuring the corresponding molecular uptake and concentrations using histopathology.
Avmacol is an over-the-counter dietary supplement containing broccoli seed and sprout extracts in tablet form, hypothesized to activate protective cellular pathways including detoxication. In this study, participants who have been curatively treatment for head and neck cancer, will take Avmacol twice a day for 3 months.
Rates of depression and anxiety in cancer patients are much higher compared to the general population. 40% of head and neck cancer patients will develop significant distress along the cancer journey. Less than half of these patients are able to access support, with factors such as age, social difficulty, cancer stage and site affecting referral. In 2016, 78,000 Canadians died of cancer, yet there is limited implementation of routine and integrated advanced care planning in cancer care. An upcoming deliverable of all cancer centres in Ontario is the integration of Cancer Care Ontario's Psychosocial and Palliative Care (PSOPC) pathway into all disease pathways. Successful widespread implementation of this pathway at Odette Cancer Centre (OCC) will impact >16,000 patients/year. If effective, it will reduce suffering, unnecessary healthcare utilization, improve treatment decisions and compliance, enable a better quality of life in survivorship and improve quality at end of life. There is a need for better developed, standardized response pathways to address PSO and PC needs throughout the patient's journey.
Radiotherapy (RT), surgery and chemotherapy (CT) are treatments for head and neck cancers, used alone or in combination. Conformal RT with Intensity Modulation (IMRT) is currently the reference technique. IMRT requires a precise definition of the target volumes to be treated and the anatomical structures to be protected from irradiation. Most studies of head and neck cancers published in the literature demonstrate the variability in the contouring of the target volumes between radiotherapists. This may have an impact on dosimetry. To date, no studies have evaluated the impact of the ENT surgeon's evaluation in volumes contouring. The aim of this study is to compare the volumes determined by the radiotherapists alone and those determined jointly by the radiotherapists and the ENT surgeon.