Clinical Trials Logo

Hand Fracture clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Hand Fracture.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04527588 Withdrawn - Hand Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials

Italian Translation of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire

Start date: December 1, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are important clinical items for evaluating injuries and recovery of the hand. Some of the most used Questionnaires, unfortunately, are not available in Italian.

NCT ID: NCT03632304 Completed - Anesthesia, Local Clinical Trials

Local Anesthesia With Minimal Sedation and Brachial Plexus Block in Hand Surgery

Start date: August 17, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

A major innovation in hand surgery in the last decade is the popularization of Wide Awake Hand Surgery (WAHS). This technique consists of numbing the surgical area with local anesthesia with epinephrine and allowing the patient to actively move their hand intra-operatively to assess the strength and quality of repairs or fixations. Despite its theoretical advantages, the application in clinical practice has seldom spread further than simple hand operations, such as carpal tunnel and trigger finger releases. In many institutions, the current standard of care for hand surgery is the brachial plexus block. The primary objective of the study to directly compare the effects of local anesthesia with minimal sedation, performed by the surgeon, and the brachial plexus block, performed by the anesthesiologist, on patient-reported quality of recovery. Currently, there are no studies in the surgical literature directly comparing patient-reported quality of recovery, post-operative pain control, or time efficiency between local anesthesia and the brachial plexus block in hand surgery. This lack of information is a major impediment to the acceptance and adoption of a simple yet effective anesthesia technique that may increase patient satisfaction and time efficiency in the operating room. This proposed prospective randomized controlled study will quantitatively compare local anesthesia and brachial plexus block on three fronts: 1) patient-reported recovery at 24-hours post-surgery using the validated Quality of Recovery 15 score (QoR-15), 2) post-operative pain and opioid use at 24-hours post-surgery, and 3) nonsurgical time (defined as the time elapsed from one surgery's end time to the next surgery's start time) as a metric for turnover efficiency. The investigators hypothesize that patients randomized to the local anesthesia group will have a more positive recovery experience, a similar pain profile compared to the brachial plexus block despite common beliefs, and a shorter anesthesia-related and nonsurgical time. The importance of patient-centered care cannot be understated in a successful and high-quality health care system. The results of this study will provide valuable information regarding the patient experience during their post- operative recovery.

NCT ID: NCT03555929 Completed - Wrist Fracture Clinical Trials

Impact on Sensitivity and Motor Block Duration of an Intravenous Dexamethasone an Axillary Block With Mepivacaine.

DEXA-rescue
Start date: April 4, 2018
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Intravenous dexamethasone is used to increase the duration of analgesia of interscalene bloc for shoulder surgery: it extends from 11h to 23h the sensitivity block in shoulder area. However, the time of dexamethasone intravenous injection has not been studied. In all studies, dexamethasone was injected right after the achievement of loco regional anesthesia. The main objective is to demonstrate that intravenous injection of dexamethasone delayed at 90 minutes in patients who received an axillary block with mepivacaine prolongs the duration of the motor block by 40 minutes.

NCT ID: NCT03496337 Completed - Hand Injuries Clinical Trials

Is AMPS a Responsive Tool for Assessing Change in ADL-abilities After Finger or Hand Surgery

Start date: November 1, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The aim of the study is to assess the responsiveness of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) in a population of patients undergoing rehabilitation following hand surgery, as this has not previously been investigated. Methods: Patients are included from the department of physical and occupational therapy at Silkeborg Regional Hospital in the period November 2017 to May 2018. A total of 50 patients, who have been referred for specialized occupational therapy rehabilitation following finger or hand surgery, will be included. At baseline and follow-up (after 8 weeks) all patients are assessed with AMPS, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), hand grip strength and joint range of motion using standardized methods. Responsiveness to change is evaluated using an anchor-based method, comparing AMPS scores with the scores on the Global Rating Scale. The area under the ROC curve will be calculated, and an area under the curve of 0.7 is considered acceptable. Convergent and discriminative validity of the AMPS will be assessed across the different instruments used. Thus the investigators expect a higher correlation between AMPS and COPM and lower correlation between AMPS and hand grip strength and range of motion.

NCT ID: NCT02870465 Completed - Hand Fracture Clinical Trials

Hand K-wire Infections in Operating Room Versus Ambulatory Setting

Start date: September 29, 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The main objective of this non-interventional, observational study is to analyze the rate and type of infection complications while performing closed reduction internal fixation (CRIF) of hand fractures in the operating room versus an ambulatory setting. The investigators will do so by prospectively collecting data on the type of fracture, handedness, co-morbidities, duration of treatment, number and type of K-wires, duration of fixation and complication rate. Patients presenting with hand fractures to the emergency room will be recruited. Patients will be recruited in multiple centres across Canada and managed according to the institutional standard. The complication type and rate will be recorded and analyzed to determine a difference of performing the procedure in the operating room or clinical setting.