Village-Integrated Eye Worker Trial II

Glaucoma Clinical Trial

— VIEW II  

Official title:

Village-Integrated Eye Worker Trial II (VIEW II):A Cluster-randomized Trial of the Effectiveness of Community-based Ocular Disease Screening in Nepal

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03752840
• Other study ID #: 17-22776-2
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: April 21, 2019
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: October 2023
• Source: University of California, San Francisco
• Contact: Krisianne M Aromin, BS
• Phone: 4154761442
• Email: krisianne.aromin[@]ucsf.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The vast majority of blindness is avoidable. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 80% of cases of visual impairment could be prevented or reversed with early diagnosis and treatment. The leading causes of visual impairment are cataract and refractive error, followed by glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and diabetic retinopathy (DR). Loss of vision from these conditions is not inevitable; however, identifying at-risk cases and linking cases with appropriate care remain significant challenges. To address the global burden of avoidable blindness, eye care systems must determine optimal strategies for identifying people with or at risk for visual impairment beyond opportunistic screening. Outreach programs can prevent blindness both by screening for asymptomatic disease like age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and glaucoma and case detection of symptomatic disease like cataract and refractive error. Eye care systems have developed numerous community-based approaches to these identification methods, including screening using telemedicine and case detection via cataract camps or community health worker models, but no studies have been conducted on the comparative effectiveness or cost effectiveness of these various approaches. Technology promises to greatly improve access to sophisticated eye care. AMD, DR, and glaucoma can result in irreversible vision loss, and early diagnosis and effective treatment can prevent progression.Thus, community screening programs may prevent progression and improve the vision of a population.However, mass screening for eye disease is currently not recommended. Although self-evident that early detection can prevent blindness for an individual, no randomized controlled trial has been able to demonstrate that screening improves visual acuity at the community level. However, recent technological advances promise to dramatically change the equation by allowing non-medical personnel to use mobile,easy-to-use retinal imaging devices to diagnose screenable eye diseases such as AMD, DR, and glaucoma. Mobile technology could also transform the way clinics communicate with their patients, improving linkage to and retention in care. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an ideal test for community-based screening. OCT can be performed through an undilated pupil and is less subject to optical aberrations due to cataract than is fundus photography. OCT machines have pre-installed algorithms to screen for glaucoma, and major anatomical abnormalities can easily be detected even by novice technicians. The infrared image allows detection of referable diabetic retinopathy, and newer OCT angiography machines offer even more discrimination of early diabetic retinopathy. OCT machines are ever more portable, and could be feasibly used in community-based screening programs. The investigators propose a large cluster-randomized trial in Nepal to compare two community-based blindness prevention programs: (1) a state-of-the-art screening program employing OCT and intraocular pressure testing to screen for glaucoma, DR, and AMD followed by enhanced linkage-to-care to the local eye hospital, and (2) a screening program involving only visual acuity assessment. An initial door-to-door census will assess baseline visual acuity in both study arms. The investigators will compare visual acuity between the two arms through a second door-to-door census 4 years later (primary outcome). The investigators maximize their chances of finding an effect by conducting the study in Nepal, where the burden of undiagnosed eye diseases is high. If successful in Nepal, future studies could assess the generalizability of such a program to other settings, such as rural communities in the industrialized world.

Description:

The research will consist of a large cluster-randomized trial in Nepal in which all communities receive visual acuity screening during a baseline census, and then half subsequently receive screening with OCT and intraocular pressure testing with an iCare tonometer. Participants with abnormal results will be referred to the local eye hospital for examination and treatment. Repeat visual acuity assessment will be performed 4 years later. Those with incident visual impairment at the time of the final census, defined as visual acuity worse than Snellen 20/60 (Metric Snellen worse than 6/18; logMAR worse than 0.48), will receive a comprehensive eye exam to determine the cause of visual impairment. Specific Aim 1 - Visual Acuity: To determine whether an intensive screening program results in better visual acuity at 4 years than screening with visual acuity testing alone. The investigators hypothesize that individuals from clusters randomized to the intensive screening program will have better visual acuity compared to those receiving visual acuity testing alone. Specific Aim 2 - Eye Disease: To determine whether an intensive screening program reduces the incidence of visual impairment due to AMD, DR, or glaucoma. The investigators hypothesize that incident visual impairment due to AMD, DR, or glaucoma will be less common in clusters randomized to the intensive screening program.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 60000
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: August 31, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 60 Years and older

Eligibility

Community level

Inclusion Criteria:

• Located in catchment area of Bharatpur Eye Hospital or Lumbini Eye Institute
• Accessible by non-4WD vehicle
• Urban or peri-urban

Exclusion Criteria:

• Local leaders unwilling to participate Person level

Inclusion Criteria:

• 60 years and older
• Residing in the community during the time of the census

Exclusion Criteria:

• Unwilling to participate

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Age-related Macular Degeneration
• Diabetic Retinopathy
• Glaucoma
• Macular Degeneration

Intervention

Other:
• Visual acuity (presenting and pinhole)
Presenting and pinhole visual acuity will be assessed using the Peek Acuity mobile application. Participants meeting referral criteria will be referred to the nearest eye care center or eye hospital.
• Optical coherence tomography (OCT)
OCT will be used to image the anterior segment, the macula, and the retinal nerve fiber layer. The images will be assessed for abnormalities and participants meeting referral criteria will be referred to the local eye hospital.
• Intraocular pressure
Intraocular pressure will be measured using an iCare tonometer. Participants meeting referral criteria will be referred to the nearest eye care center or eye hospital.
• Active linkage to care
Referred participants will be followed closely by study staff to ensure completion of follow-up visits.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Nepal	Lumbini Eye Institute	Bhairahawa
Nepal	Bharatpur Eye Hospital	Bharatpur	Chitwan

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of California, San Francisco	Bharatpur Eye Hospital, Lumbini Eye Institute and Hospital, Seva Foundation

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Nepal, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Bilateral visual impairment in people aged 60 years and older, defined as pinhole visual acuity worse than Snellen 20/60 (Metric Snellen worse than 6/18; logMAR worse than 0.48) in the better-seeing eye	Visual acuity will be assessed using the Peek Acuity mobile application during the final census.	4 years
Other	Bilateral presenting visual impairment in people aged 60 years and older, defined as presenting visual acuity worse than Snellen 20/60 (Metric Snellen worse than 6/18; logMAR worse than 0.48) in the better-seeing eye	Visual acuity will be assessed using the Peek Acuity mobile application during the final census.	4 years
Other	Bilateral presenting blindness in people aged 60 years and older, defined as presenting visual acuity worse than Snellen 20/400 (Metric Snellen worse than 6/120; logMAR worse than 1.3) in the better-seeing eye	Visual acuity will be assessed using the Peek Acuity mobile application during the final census.	4 years
Primary	Pinhole visual acuity (logMAR) in people aged 60 years and older	Visual acuity will be assessed using the Peek Acuity mobile application during the final census.	4 years
Secondary	Incidence of visual impairment due to AMD, DR, or glaucoma	Participants with incident visual impairment, defined as Snellen worse than 20/60 (Metric Snellen worse than 6/18; logMAR worse than 0.48), at the time of the final census will receive a comprehensive eye exam to determine the cause of visual impairment	4 years
Secondary	Bilateral blindness in people aged 60 years and older, defined as pinhole visual acuity worse than Snellen 20/400 (Metric Snellen worse than 6/120; logMAR worse than 1.3) in the better-seeing eye	Visual acuity will be assessed using the Peek Acuity mobile application during the final census.	4 years
Secondary	Presenting visual acuity (logMAR) in people aged 60 years and older	Visual acuity will be assessed using the Peek Acuity mobile application during the final census.	4 years
Secondary	Cost-effectiveness of the screening intervention	Costs associated with the screening intervention will be actively recorded during the study period and number of cases of AMD, DR, and glaucoma diagnosed and visual acuity as assessed with Peek Acuity during the final census will be used to evaluate effectiveness.	4 years