Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05590832 |
Other study ID # |
Gy1995 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
June 15, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
December 30, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
November 2023 |
Source |
T.C. ORDU ÜNIVERSITESI |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Methods: The study is a randomized controlled experimental study. Groups were determined by
stratified randomization according to the BMI of the pregnant women. In the study, individual
identification form, Healthy Living Behaviors in Pregnancy Scale (HLBPS), and maternal
questionnaire were used. The initiative program was carried out via WhatsApp messages on a
smartphone. Messages regarding routine prenatal care were sent to the intervention group
three times a week, and to the control group once a month, about appropriate weight gain,
nutrition, and physical activity via WhatsApp.
Results: The mean gestational weight gain was 13.1±4.3 in the intervention group and 14.6±4.2
in the control group, and no significant difference was found between the groups. According
to the IOM guideline, there was a significant difference between the groups in terms of
appropriate GWG , while no significant difference was found between excessive GWG.HLBPS scale
total score, nutrition and physical activity post-test mean scores increased significantly in
the intervention group compared to the control group. In the intervention group, the
group/time interaction in the scale total score, nutrition and physical activity scores of
the pregnant women who gained appropriate weight according to the IOM guideline was
significant, and the intervention was effective.Significant differences were found between
the groups in the pretest-posttest score differences in the HLBPS total score, nutrition and
physical activity sub-dimensions of the pregnant women.
Conclusion: Healthy nutrition and physical activity short message intervention with a smart
phone increased the appropriate gestational weight gain rates of pregnants in the
intervention group according to the IOM guideline, and the intervention was effective.
However, there was no difference between the groups in terms of excessive gestational weight
gain. It is recommended to conduct studies with a high level of evidence, including internet
and social media applications, with larger samples.
Description:
Most of the descriptive characteristics of the intervention and control group pregnant women
who participated in the study were homogenously distributed (p>0.05). A significant
difference was found only between gestational week and place of residence (p<0.05).The mean
total GWG of all pregnant women participating in the study was 13.9±4.3/kg. The mean
difference between the intervention (13.1±4.3/kg) and control group (14.6±4.2/kg) pregnant
women was 1.5 kg, but no significant difference was found between the groups (p>0.05). The
rate of GWG within the limits of IOM guideline recommendations in the intervention group
pregnant women (48.9%) was significantly higher than in the control group (22.2%) (p<0.05).
Excessive GWG was found to be higher in the control group (68.9%) than in the intervention
group (48.9%), but no significant difference was found (p>0.05).In the pre-intervention,
pre-test data, pregnancy responsibility, nutrition and physical activity and HLBPS total
scores were higher in the intervention group than in the control group (p<0.05). While no
significant difference was found between the groups in the post-test scores of the pregnancy
responsibility sub-dimension of the intervention/control group pregnant women (p>0.05), a
statistically significant difference was found in both intervention (p<0.001) and control
groups (p<0.001) in the in-group pre-post comparison. While there was a significant increase
in the intra-group nutrition, physical activity sub-dimension and HLBPS total score of the
intervention group pregnant women (p<0.001), no significant increase was observed in the
control group (p>0.05). In the post-test comparison between groups, nutrition, physical
activity sub-dimension score and HLBPS total score increased significantly in the
intervention group compared to the control group (p<0.001). While the nutrition sub-dimension
score of the intervention group was effective in appropriate GWG, it was not effective in the
control group. Physical activity sub-dimension and HLBPS total score were effective in
appropriate GWG in both intervention and control groups.