View clinical trials related to Gastric Cancer.
Filter by:Background: Gastric cancer is a common and serious cancer. Standard treatment is chemotherapy drugs. Researchers want to see if a new treatment helps. It is surgical removal of the cancer and heated chemotherapy delivered to the abdominal cavity called HIPEC. Objective: To test if surgical removal of tumors plus heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy can improve survival in people with gastric cancers. Eligibility: People ages 18 and older with gastric cancer who can have most tumors surgically removed Design: Participants will be screened with: - Medical history - Physical exam - Blood, urine, and heart tests - Scans - Tissue sample from previous surgery - Endoscopy with biopsy: A tube with a camera goes through the mouth and into the stomach. It and takes a sample of stomach tissue. Participants might may get medicine to make them drowsy. - Laparoscopy: Small cuts are made in the abdomen. A thin tube with a light and camera is inserted into the abdomen. Participants sleep through the procedure. Participants will stay in the hospital. They will have: - Surgery to remove as many tumors as possible. - HIPEC for 60 minutes: Two thin tubes are put into the abdomen. Two chemotherapy drugs are given through one tube. They are drained out through another at a temperature a few degrees above normal body temperature. Another drug is given in a vein. Recovery for 7-21 days: Participants will have tubes in their stomach and bladder and IVs for a few days. They will get pain medicine, IV fluids, antibiotics, and blood transfusions as needed. Participants will have visits every few months for 3 years, then one a year. Visits include physical exam, blood tests, and scans. They also include dietary assessment and questions.
This is a single-arm clinical trial.The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Raltitrexed and Paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma .The primary endpoint of this study is objective response rate.The secondary endpoint of this study is safety,progression-free survival and overall survival.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been introduced with purposes of reducing the surgical stress response and obtaining optimal recovery after surgery.
Background: Stomach cancer is common around the world. The US is a low-risk region. But the 5-year survival rate in the US is low. This is because the cancer is usually in a late stage by the time it is diagnosed. One way to detect it earlier is to screen many people with a procedure called endoscopy. But this may not be feasible in low-risk or developing countries. Researchers want to find a biomarker for early-stage disease to help them create an effective way of screening. DNA methylation is a chemical modification of DNA. It generates a signal for certain cancers, including stomach cancer. Researchers want to find a blood-based DNA methylation marker for stomach cancer. Objective: To study plasma DNA methylation as a potential biomarker for detection of stomach cancer. Eligibility: Participants from 2 studies already done in China Design: Researchers will use blood samples from participants in the 2 studies. The blood was collected in 1999/2000. They will use samples from some who developed stomach cancer between those years and 2006. The other samples will be from some who stayed cancer free in that time. Participants already gave written informed consent. Researchers will take DNA from the samples. They will look for methylation.
The metabolic effect of oncometabolic surgery (long limb Roux-en Y reconstruction) for early gastric cancer patients has been revealed in a few pilot studies. However, the nutritional safety has not been dealt with in previous literatures. This is a prospective pilot study for evaluating the nutritional safety and metabolic benefits of oncometabolic surgery for obese early gastric cancer patients.
This is a retrospective and prospective multicenter registry to collect long-term data (1 year) on patients who have or will undergo Endoscopic resection such as EMR, ESD, EFTR, STER, etc. within the gastrointestinal tract for endoscopic treatment of early gastrointestinal neoplasms involving the resection of the superficial layers, mucosa and submucosa, of the tract wall. Subjects will be consented for medical chart review. The purpose of this retrospective and prospective registry is to assess long term data on efficacy, safety and clinical outcome of Endoscopic Resection within the gastrointestinal tract (1 year). The registry will evaluate efficacy, technical feasibility, clinical outcome, safety profile and overall clinical management through medical chart review. The procedures the investigators are evaluating are all clinically indicated and will not be prescribed to someone to participate in this registry study.
In line with improvements in oncologic outcome for patients with esophageal cancer, the attritional impact of curative treatment with respect to functional status and health-related quality of life (HR-QL) in survivorship is increasingly an important focus. Functional recovery after surgery for esophageal cancer is commonly confounded by anorexia and early satiety, which may reduce oral nutrient intake with consequent malnutrition and weight loss. One in three disease-free patients has more than fifteen percent body weight loss at three years after esophagectomy. The ESPEN Special Interest Group on cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting diseases has defined sarcopenia as skeletal muscle index (SMI) of ≤39 cm2/m2 for women and ≤55cm2/m2 for men, while similar cut-off points have been validated in upper gastrointestinal and respiratory malignancies (less than 38.5 cm2/m2 for women and 52.4 cm2/m2 for men). The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) additionally recommends that assessment should also include determination of muscle function, for example gait speed or grip strength, where possible. The presence of sarcopenia is associated with increase treatment-associated morbidity, impaired HR-QL, reduced physical and role functioning, and increased pain scores in older adults. In addition, a previous longitudinal study demonstrated that the decline in HR-QL over a six year period in older adults was accelerated in the presence of sarcopenia. As such, sarcopenia may represent a modifiable barrier to recovery and subsequent retention of HR-QL and functional status, and may reinforce a persistent illness identity, among patients following potentially curative treatment for esophageal cancer.
Background: Literature often shows limited and discordant data regarding the prognostic value of age in gastric-cancer patients. Generally, disease-specific survival does not seem to be worse in the elderly when compared with younger patients, and therefore gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for non-early tumors is considered the "standard" surgical therapy for all of operable patients, despite any age- or comorbidity-related limitations. Recent trials reported a survival benefit for extended nodal dissection compared with the more limited method, but some Authors found age (and comorbidities) to be a relevant predictor of postoperative complications, conditioning the safety of the surgical procedure itself. Methods/Design: The LELEGA Trial (Limited versus Extended Lymphadenectomy in high risk Elderly with Gastric Adenocarcinoma) is a randomized, clinical multicenter trial. All patients >75 years and with Charlson Comorbidity Score >5 with resectable M0 gastric cancer are eligible for inclusion and randomization. The primary endpoint is 5-year Disease-Specific Survival (DSS). Secondary endpoints include 5-year Overall Survival (OS) and postoperative complications classified according to Clavien-Dindo. Assuming an alpha (two-sided) of 5%, 232 patients per group are necessary to achieve an 80% power to detect a 13% survival difference (from 56% to 69%) between groups. Discussion: LELEGA trial is a prospective, multicenter randomized study to define optimal extent of lymphadenectomy (extended versus limited) in elderly and high-comorbidity gastric cancer patients.
Gastric cancer has an incidence in North America of over 24,000 new cases annually, of which approximately 15% are diagnosed at an early stage. Standard of care for early gastric cancer (EGC) treatment has historically included anatomical resection with regional lymphadenectomy. However, with the recent emergence of organ-sparing techniques, select patients with a very low risk of lymph node metastases are able to avoid anatomical resection and its inherent short and long term consequences. Despite this advance, EGC patients with high risk features continue to require anatomical resection to achieve adequate lymph node staging, despite the fact that 75-95% of these patients ultimately are found to have node negative disease. Due to the inadequacy of standard imaging modalities to reliably detect nodal metastases in EGC patients, sentinel lymph node sampling for gastric cancer was developed using principals similar to those used broadly for breast and melanoma patients. Early reports from Asia suggest this technique has very high success rates, accuracy and sensitivity, however it has never been verified in a North American context. This study aims to test SLN sampling for North American gastric cancer patients at a high volume regional treatment centre, with an aim to expand the application of organ sparing resection to EGC patients. This project aims to determine the sensitivity and accuracy of sentinel lymph node sampling for early gastric cancer patients at a high volume, North American, tertiary care centre.
This study is a multi-center, prospective cohort study which are planned to enroll the 2,500 patients who diagnosed the primary gastric cancer and 5,000 healthy normal cohort participants for 5 years. All participants who enrolled in this registry, the participants were questioned by the gastric cancer survey and the serum and tissue of these participants were analyzed. The main aim of this study is 1. To evaluate the optimal interval of endoscopic screening for early detection of gastric cancer and risk factors in Korean. 2. To evaluate the diagnostic validity of serum biomarker (combining pepsinogen, H pylori IgG Antibody, and TFF3) as a screening test for detection of GC in Korean.