View clinical trials related to Gastric Cancer.
Filter by:This study aimed to develop a novel Prognostic Oxidative Stress-Immune-Inflammatory Score (POSII Score) and introduce an innovative online calculator designed to predict long-term survival and assess the recurrence risk of gastric cancer (GC).
The goal of this study is to test a new PET imaging agent in patients with solid tumors. This tracer is made of a radioactively-labeled monoclonal antibody MNPR-101, and can show where tumors are present in the body using a PET-scan. The investigators will investigate if the new imaging agent correctly shows all tumor lesions. In the future, this method may be useful to help predict who will benefit from certain therapies. Participants will be injected with the radioactive tracer once. After injection, participants will undergo 3 PET-scans. Each PET-scan will take a maximum of 30 minutes. The PET-scans are on separate days within 10 days after injection of the tracer (e.g., 2 hours after injection plus 3-5 days and 7-10 days after injection). Furthermore, the investigators will take blood samples 6 times (5 mL each). Blood pharmacokinetics (PK) will be measured on Day 1 at 10 min, 1h, 2h, once on Days 3-5, and once on Days 7-10. The amount of radioactivity injected will range between 37-74 MBq (±10%).
This study is a prospective, single-center, observational study aimed at detecting the status of serum protein profiles at key time points in gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for advanced disease, and constructing a serum protein model for evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer. Subjects will receive neoadjuvant therapy (treatment regimen determined by the primary physician, limited to systemic therapy, with options including immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimens and non-immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimens). After four cycles of treatment, the efficacy will be assessed. Patients eligible for R0 resection will undergo D2 radical surgery regardless of tumor regression, while those ineligible for R0 resection will enter the palliative treatment phase (Note: Subjects are all patients who require neoadjuvant therapy even if they do not participate in this clinical study). Patients will receive regular follow-up evaluations for metastasis/recurrence and survival until tumor recurrence/progression or the last known date of patient survival (Note: Regular follow-up in this study follows the frequency of routine clinical follow-ups). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint is pathological response rate (based on Becker tumor regression grading, with residual tumor less than 50% considered effective preoperative treatment). Peripheral venous blood samples will be collected before the start of neoadjuvant therapy (blood sampling point 1 - baseline) and before surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (blood sampling point 2 - post-treatment). Approximately 3 ml of blood will be collected each time, and about 1.5 ml of serum will be obtained after processing. Serum protein profiling will be conducted to assess the expression of protein profiles at these treatment time points.
Many studies have shown a significant change of diversity and composition in gut microbiota across the gastric carcinogenesis process, particularly in patients with gastric cancer. However, there has been no analysis of gastric microbiota using the mucosal brushing technique, despite its favoring benefit in microbiota study. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate microbiota profile in patients with gastric cancer, compared to those without gastric cancer by using mucosal brush sampling. This will improve current knowledge of the potential role of the microbiome in patient gastric cancer as a future biomarker marker using brushing sampling.
Endoscopic screening of gastric cancer combined with screening colonoscopy
After the initial diagnostic laparoscopy the Control group patients undergo 6 courses of polychemotherapy according to the FLOT scheme; the examination is carried out every 3 courses (after the 3rd and the 6th courses) with the control diagnostic laparoscopy after 6 courses of polychemotherapy. In the event of the complete regression of foci along the peritoneum and receiving Cy- in the peritoneal lavage, the dynamic observation or cytoreductive surgery is considered (optionally); in case of the incomplete response the dynamic observation is carried out until progression; in case of progression the 2nd line of chemotherapy or the optimal palliative care options depending on the clinical situation is considered. After the initial diagnostic laparoscopy the Study group patients undergo courses of polychemotherapy according to the scheme FLOT (the 1st, the 3rd, the 5th courses) and mFLOT (the 2nd , the 4th, the 6th courses) in the amount of 6 (six, 3+3); the examination is carried out every 3 courses (after the 3rd and the 6th courses) with dPIPAC sessions using docetaxel (thus excluding it from the system administration) in the 2nd , the 4th, the 6th courses of polychemotherapy. Control diagnostic laparoscopy is not performed in the group No 2, its function is performed by the revision at the PIPAC session of the 6th course of polychemotherapy, which corresponds to the time interval of the Control group. In the event of the complete regression of foci along the peritoneum and receiving Cy- in the peritoneal lavage, the dynamic observation or cytoreductive surgery is considered (optionally); in case of the incomplete response the dynamic observation is carried out until progression; in case of progression the 2nd line of chemotherapy or the optimal palliative care options depending on the clinical situation is considered.
The purpose of this study is to find out whether treatment with metronomic capecitabine will improve the survival of gastric cancer patients with stage III who had received standard treatment.
For locally advanced esophagogastric junction and gastric cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can downstage T and N stage,treated distant micrometastases early , and finally improve the long-term survival. Combination of perioperative PD-1 antibody and chemotherapy for locally advanced esophagogastric junction and gastric cancer could be a novel therapy to increase response rate and reduce recurrence rate.Cadonilimab, a tetravalent bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4, is designed to retain the efficacy benefit of combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 and improve on the safety profile of the combination therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cadonilimab Plus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Junction and Gastric Cancer.
Aneuploidy may be used as a more sensitive diagnostic tool to detect peritoneal metastasis compared to conventional cytology and imaging techniques. Our aim is to establish whether aneuploidy as detected in cfDNA (as a measure for ctDNA) in PLF of patients with GC may hold value as an additional staging and tumor evaluation method in GC patients.
To evaluate the feasibility, applicability, effectiveness, and health-economic value of the risk-based sequential screening modality for esophageal and gastric cancers, the investigators aim to initiate a community-based randomized controlled trial in Xun County, Henan Province, which is a high-risk region of upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGIC) in northern China. A total of 258 target villages from all the 11 communities (townships and streets) in Xun County will be randomly selected and assigned to the sequential screening group and the universal screening group at a ratio of 2:1 and the total sample size will be 21,000. In the sequential screening group, participants in the top 50% risk level (i.e., stratified as the high-risk subgroup) will be offered a standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopic screening. In contrast, all participants in the universal screening group will receive the endoscopic examination. The surveillance strategy for participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions in the sequential screening group will be tailored based on individualized risk assessment using endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers. Surveillance for participants in the universal screening group will adhere to current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment. Detection rates of upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions, early-stage malignant lesions and premalignant lesions, and health-economic indicators such as the unit cost per detected malignant lesions will be compared between the two groups.