View clinical trials related to Fractures, Bone.
Filter by:The fracture of the proximal humerus represents 4% of the fractures encountered in clinics and it must be treated surgically. Thus, the aim of the surgical treatment is to maintain bone alignment, articular congruity, vascularization of the humeral head and provide a painless shoulder with satisfactory function. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the potential benefits of an early rehabilitation program on shoulder function.
The purpose of this study is to compare hemiarthroplasty (HAP) with total hip arthroplasty (THA), performed by trained arthroplasty surgeons with the use of large femoral heads for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in mobile independent elderly patients, to determine the impact of these surgical options on the short term functional outcomes and complication rates, namely dislocation and the need for further surgery. This is a single-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial comparing functional outcome and complication rates of 40 patients treated with all cemented THA to a control group of 40 patients treated with cemented bipolar HAP, in a 2 years followup. The primary endpoint is the Oxford hip score (OHS) at last followup as a measure of functional outcome. Secondary endpoints include the SF-36 score, walking distance and rates of postoperative dislocation, component loosening, need for revision and postoperative mortality.
The investigators are comparing two methods of standard treatments in distal tibial fractures. locked plating (M.I.P.O. technique) with intramedullary nailing. the investigators are hypothesizing that M.I.P.O group is superior to nailing in fractures of the distal third of the tibia.
This post-market clinical study is being done to evaluate the use of the NovaLign™ Intramedullary Fixation System in the treatment of humeral fractures.
Rotational deformity or malunion causes the most significant functional deficit in these common fractures. The evaluation of the rotation may be performed with the metacarpophalangeal joints flexed although postoperative swelling may not enable this examination with flexion of the fingers. Furthermore, it has been shown that swelling may cause rotation of the digit itself. The investigators propose that the swelling may cause a mistake in the estimation of rotation, during surgery and early follow up period. This is of special importance when open reduction and rigid fixation is performed. Methods: Prospective analysis of XX isolated metacarpal fractures treated, in YY patients was performed. End-on view of the finger-nail was taken with a digital camera on the day of OR, at 2 weeks and at 1 year. The photos were taken on a standard apparatus and from a distance of XX cm and evaluated using ZZ software in comparison with photos taken of the other hand, according to the involved digit. Range of motion, type of fracture and type of fixation were compared.
Open fractures are frequently encountered in orthopaedics. Treatment usually calls for a formal, operative procedure in which the bone is exposed, foreign tissue is debrided and the wound is irrigated. While this is the current standard of care, not all open fractures are equal. In retrospective studies, centers are reporting less aggressive operative management for open fractures may result in equal results without the time and expense of the operative theater. The investigators propose a prospective, randomized trial of children with type I open fractures to evaluate whether formal operative treatment is necessary. The investigators' hypothesis is that minor open fractures can be safely treated in the emergency room with irrigation, closed reduction and home antibiotics without an increased risk of infection or other complications. Children who meet the study criteria will be randomized into two treatment arms - formal operative management (OR) and emergency department (ED) management. Outcomes from each group will be evaluated and compared, including rate of infection, number of return visits to the operating room, time to union, and other complications.
Displaced four-part fractures are among the most severe injuries of the proximal humerus. The optimal treatment is disputed and published data are inadequate for evidence-based decision making. The investigators aim to: 1) compare the effect of angle-stable plate osteosynthesis and non-surgical management, 2) compare the effect of primary hemiarthroplasty with both osteosynthesis and non-surgical management, 3) study prognostic differences between 'valgus impacted' and 'classical' four-part fracture patterns. The investigators will conduct a randomised, multi-centre, clinical trial including patients from ten national shoulder units within a two year period. Patients will be randomised to non-surgical treatment, hemiarthroplasty or angle-stable plate osteosynthesis. All patients will receive a standardised three-month rehabilitation program of supervised physiotherapy. Patients will be followed at least one year and will be assessed blindly according to a standardised evaluation protocol including Constant Disability Scale, Oxford Shoulder Score, and Short Form-36.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate our experience in internal fixation of intracapsular femoral neck fractures with the Targon FN implant prospectively and retrospectively in terms of the outcomes and complications associated with the treatment.
The purpose of this study is to compare between two methods of internal fixation, the 3-4 parallel screws or the Targon FN implant in gardens type 1-2 or Pauwels type 1-2 femoral neck fractures in terms of the outcomes and complications associated with the treatment of these fractures.
To determine if operative treatment of non operative management of these fractures is best. Hypothesis: There is no difference in functional outcome between operative and non-operatively treated 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures at one year's time.