View clinical trials related to Fracture of Hip.
Filter by:The goal of this pilot, patient blinded randomized trial is to develop a mechanistic understanding of gait following fixation of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures and return to function and pain control. The guiding hypothesis that will be tested in a subsequent clinical trial is that the InterTAN when compared to standard lag-screw cephalomedullary nails will have decreased post operative pain, earlier return to symmetric weight bearing, and quicker return to pre-injury functioning levels.
It reduces pain scores in patients with block and improves the quality of recovery in the postoperative period. In patients who will undergo spinal anesthesia, it will be questioned whether the application of the block before or after surgery makes a difference in the quality of recovery.
Aim: To compare the effect of one single dose versus multiple doses of prophylactic antibiotics administered within 24 hours, on the development of PJI after surgery in patients undergoing primary THA due to an acute fracture or sequelae of proximal femoral or acetabular fractures. The study is designed as a cross-over, cluster randomized, non-inferiority trial. All Danish orthopedic surgery departments performing primary THA with the majority being within inclusion criteria will be involved: Based on national quality databases, two-year cohorts of approximately 2,000 primary THAs due to a fracture or sequelae to a fracture, conducted at all public and private orthopedic departments in Denmark, this includes 36 sites corresponding to a total of 39 departments.
A randomized control trial, including two intervention arms with different methods for rehabilitation after hip fracture, conducted among persons with the need of rehabilitation in their own home.
The main objectives of this study are to confirm the long-term safety, performance, and clinical benefits of the G7 Acetabular Shells when used with the Vivacit-E and Longevity HXLPE liners and instrumentation in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.
Previous studies showed that, best lung protective strategies of ventilation parameters are based on driving pressure in damaged lungs. But there are few studies concerning the effects of different positions during different types of surgery on driving pressure with normal lungs.So the investigators decided to compare mechanical ventilation based on driving pressure with conventional mechanical ventilation in patients with lateral decubitus position during total hip replacement surgery. The investigators hypothesised that, there will be better intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory parameters with better early postoperative results in patients whom mechanical ventilation parameters are adjusted according to driving pressure. In this randomised, controlled, double blind study, 60 patients who will have total hip replacement surgery will be recruited to the study. 30 patients will be ventilated by 8 ml/kg tidal volume and 5 cmH20 PEEP, in conventional lung protective group. And the other 30 patients will be ventilated by 8 ml/kg tidal volume and PEEP level with the lowest driving pressure. The investigators primary goal in this study study is to compare the effects of conventional lung protective ventilation with ventilation based on driving pressure on hemodynamic and respiratory parameters. And secondly, the investigators aim to compare the effects of these two techniques s on early postoperative outcome. The investigators primary result parameters are intra operative fluid consumption, lactate, etC02 and mix venous oxygen saturation levels.The investigators secondary result parameters are postoperative mechanical ventilation, ICU stay and discharge times.
This study is a Post Market Clinical Follow up study to fulfil the post market surveillance obligations according to Medical Device Directive and European Medical Device Vigilance System (MEDDEV) 2.12-2. The data collected from this study will serve the purpose of confirming safety and performance of the Avenir Müller Hip Stem.
This study is a Post Market Clinical Follow up study to fulfil the post market surveillance obligations according to Medical Device Directive and European Medical Device Vigilance System (MEDDEV) 2.12-2. The data collected from this study will serve the purpose of confirming safety and performance of the Zimmer Stafit Acetabular System.
The peripheral perfusion index (PPI) is a non-invasive, feasible measure of peripheral perfusion and, assumed, the overall circulation, which all patients are monitored by. This study is carried out to assess the association between values of PPI, haemoglobin and blood transfusion. Hypothetically, patients with low values of hb are more susceptible to a deteriorating circulation reflected in poorer PPI regardless of blood pressure and that resuscitation with blood products improves PPI measurements. Moreover, that patients with low values of PPI have more surgical complications and higher mortality.
Introduction Perioperative haemodynamic instability is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Macrocirculatory parameters, such as the conventionally obtained mean arterial blood pressure and cardiac output, may be uncoupled from the microcirculation during sepsis and severe blood loss and may not necessarily be optimal resuscitation parameters. The peripheral perfusion index (PPI) is derived from the pulse oximetry signal and reflects perfusion. Reduced peripheral perfusion is associated with morbidity in critically ill patients and in patients following acute surgery. We hypothesize that patients with low intraoperative PPI demonstrate high frequency of postoperative complications and mortality regardless of blood pressure. Methods and analysis We plan to conduct a prospective observational cohort study in patients undergoing acute non-cardiac surgery (November 1st, 2017 to October 31st, 2018) at two University Hospitals. Data will be collected prospectively from patient records including patient demographics, comorbidity and intraoperative hemodynamic values, with PPI as the primary exposure variable, and postoperative complications and mortality within 30 and 90 days as outcome variables. We primarily assess association between PPI and outcome in multivariate regression models. Secondly, the predictive value of PPI for outcome, using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve is assessed. Ethics and dissemination Data will be reported according to The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). Results will be published in a peer reviewed journal. The study is approved by the regional research ethics committee, storage and management of data has been approved by the Regional Data Protection Agency, and access to medical records is approved by the hospital board of directors at the involved hospitals and departments.